The Only Fly In The Ointment Of The Police State World by Robert Cook April 28th 2021
What makes the whole world , barring what little wilderness is left , a police state ? The speed at which the whole world locked down should say it all.
In spite of their differences, all nations are extremely interconnected , on the ground , in the sky and over the airwaves , including space. World leaders watch their subjects and each other. They all have certain characteristics in common , particularly when wielding power.
Donald Trump was deliberately misinterpreted when he told ‘leftie’ veteran Bob Woodward that power came from instilling fear. In this context we are supposed to believe that Trump was a threat to the United States ideal of democracy. Britain’s elite took the same view but still helped in the arrest of war crime whistle blower Julian Assange.
The so called right to vote is about getting minions to endorse what the elite will do anyway. BAME and BLM will learn the hard way , that Biden & Co are offering an illusion. Pandering to them is about neutralising the ‘poor white trash’ or deplorables as hypocritical Hilary Clinton called them . Calling them far right is to put the Nazi label on them rather than accepting it for themselves. This is moral absolutism and their creepy way of claiming absolute power.
We see this power oozing like intrusive igneous rock through the layers of sedimentary rock, changing the chemistry and warping all strata except their own – which is effectively on another planet , even if they haven’t been able to launch their Noah’s star ark yet . Meanwhile , they have their long term life support luxury bunkers ready just in case.
They talk about climate change as if it is not their fault. Their luxury lifestyles go on regardless of what we are supposed to sacrifice in lockdowns – which have no basis in science. They don’t care because they are getting richer and stronger.
World wide protests have shown how similar all police forces respond – like robots. Fear of death appears more tangible than seems to have been the case for my parent’s generation – a generation who informed much of my book and article research. Worldwide statistics inform us that only 6 % of deaths have been directly linked to Covid. We also know that such deaths are always linked to lifestyle , poverty and age – high among BAME because of high density communities and religious practice as well as diet. These truths are unpalatable because the global elite want all of us low order masses penned into a global multi culture where we can express ourselves as feminists , terfs , LGBTQI or any religion so long as there is no violence.
The whole insane mix is a recipe for hate and violence. But you can’ t argue with the science or experts. With due respect to flies , the only flies in the ointment are Russia, Iran , Syria and China where regime change is on order. Then they will be accepted into the Police State World with all its killing and spying equipment , a world of fear where a privileged few live lives of unimaginable luxury and plenty – serviced by ignorant and ever multiplying slaves . For more on this subject , read ‘The Everlasting Feast’ by Jeremy Seabrook ,a wonderful writer who was a great help to me as an author.
Spying High – April 28th by Robert Cook.
British Army to have new terrifying weapon of choice – by Robert Cook April 17th 2021
A Tale of two corpses & other thoughts – by Robert Cook April 14th 2021
It is hard to find words to assess the following two cases. I have very good reasons for disliking and not trusting the police. One officer I knew socially, told me ‘I don’t like the police Rob.’ Like a fool , I said ‘How can you be a police officer if you don’t like the police ? Before he could answer , I said ‘Oh yeh. of course, I didn’t like the Inland Revenue but still worked for them. I didn’t like the education system , but I was a teacher. I didn’t like journalists, but I did the job.’
It’s all about earning money. I don’t even like writing, but I do it. The only job I ever enjoyed was lorry driving. I supppose I still have the daft idea that writing can be more than just making money. Over 30 years ago an editor chastised me for not putting in my expenses claim on time , messing up the accounting. He prefaced his remarks with ‘ Robert , I know you have a soul above money, but……’
So must I confess that there were two occasions when I almost joined the police , with the prospect of accelerated promotion because degrees had real value back in the 1970s. I also worked with the police , upon the rcommendtion of a Chief Superintendent friend, on the Buckingham & District Crime Prevent Panel.
Crime prevention doen’t earn promotion. The police have changed along with ‘our’ ( sic ) multi cultural world. Politicians across the U.S , Britain and Europe are redefining the police as their private army as a defence and attack force against the masses. Like the British army , the coterie of officers who played the game to reach the top and deploy their troops don’t face the consequences of split second decisions. The politicans do not want an officer punished for protecting them on Capitol Hill , so shooting dead a female army veteran and small business owner is excuseable. All hell has broken loose because a white female shot dead a mixed race attempted armed robber. Even more hell will break lose if they don’t hang her out to dry.
Two very different cases with different judgements. My experience of the police makes it hard not to condemn all of them. But I know some will have gone on beyond almost joining as I did, but pulled back – for various reasons choosing to be a teacher instead.
Many will , as I almost did, have joined with no mal intent , hoping to do good. But in any profession, there are always opportunists who care more about promotion than caring. They fit well with the career politicians who are on the same page, doing all they can to create conditions for crime and self aggrandisement. I don’t know what sort of person officer Potter was , but treat good officers badly and all you will end up with is bad ones – who will recruit and promote more bad ones at the public’s expense.
No charges for officer in Capitol riot shooting: prosecutors
By Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.
Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt, 35, an Air Force veteran from San Diego. The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.
Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results.
“Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement.
Video clips posted online depict Babbitt, wearing a stars and stripes backpack, stepping up and beginning to go through the waist-high opening of an area of the Capitol known as the Speaker’s Lobby when a gunshot is heard. She falls backward. Another video shows other unidentified people attempting to lift Babbitt up. She can be seen slumping back to the ground.
Babbitt is one of five people who died in or outside the Capitol on Jan. 6, including a police officer. Three other people died of medical emergencies.
The Justice Department does not bring criminal charges in most police shootings it investigates in part because of the high burden for prosecution. Criminal charges were not expected in this case because videos of the shooting show Babbitt encroaching into a prohibited space, and second-guessing the actions of an officer during the violent and chaotic day would have been a challenge.
Kimberly Potter to be charged with second-degree manslaughter in Daunte Wright shooting Posted April 14th 2021
Police chopper deployed in busting three-man rooftop party
Kimberly Potter, the former Minnesota police officer who fatally shot Daunte Wright after mistakenly drawing her gun instead of her Taser, will be charged with second-degree manslaughter, prosecutors said Wednesday.
Washington County Attorney Peter Orput, who is prosecuting the fatal incident, said details of the charges will be released later, according to the Twin Cities Pioneer Press.
Potter, 48, was charged a day after she resigned from the Brooklyn Center Police Department in the wake of the 20-year-old’s shooting, which set off a third day of protests in the Minneapolis suburb.
The 26-year veteran and Police Chief Tim Gannon both resigned in the wake of the shooting. The city council also fired City Manager Curt Boganey over the incident.
Washington County was tapped to decide on charging instead of Hennepin County — where Brooklyn Center is located — to avoid a conflict of interest, officials said.
Wright’s death also is under review by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.
Brooklyn Center Mayor Mike Elliott on Tuesday said he would ask Gov. Tim Walz to turn the prosecution over to Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison.
Wright was pulled over around 2 p.m. Sunday for having a suspended registration, authorities said. Police said they determined he was sought on a misdemeanor arrest warrant and tried to arrest him.
But the young man broke away and got back in his car, where he was shot by Potter before speeding off and crashing farther down the road — where he was pronounced dead.
Police said the officer mistakenly grabbed her service weapon instead of her Taser and fired a single, fatal shot.
“But I believe it is in the best interest of the community, the department, and my fellow officers if I resign immediately,” she wrote.
Wright had an open warrant related to an armed robbery case against him when he was shot dead.
He and another man had been charged with first-degree attempted aggravated robbery in December 2019 for allegedly trying to steal $820 from a woman at gunpoint, according to Hennepin County District Court documents.
Minnesota protesters clash with police for third night after Daunte Wright shooting
April 14, 2021 | 12:00am | Updated
April 14, 2021 | 12:00am | Updated
National Guardsmen and local law enforcement used pepper spray and flash bangs to disperse protesters in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Tuesday, as tensions ran high for a third straight night following the cop-killing of Daunte Wright.
An unlawful assembly was declared by police after 9 p.m., ahead of a 10 p.m. curfew in the Twin City suburb, according to footage tweeted by MPR News.
National Guardsmen and local law enforcement face off with protesters in Brooklyn Center, Minn., on April 13, 2021. Stephen Yang
Protesters threw water bottles at police in response in defiance of the order to disperse, a clip from The Star Tribune showed.
By 9:20 p.m., officials had cleared protesters from one area of the police station they were gathering in front of, according to video from KSTP.
Earlier, thousands of protesters reportedly peacefully marched to an FBI headquarters, with signs demanding justice for the killing of the 20-year-old black man during a Sunday traffic stop.
Wright’s death was the third high-profile killing of a black man by police in the Minneapolis area in five years.Stephen Yang
Officer Kimberly Potter shot Wright dead after she said she confused her gun for her Taser. Potter and Brooklyn Center Police Chief Tim Gannon resigned in the wake of the shooting.
More than 50 protesters and looters were arrested during violent Monday night demonstrations as hundreds defied a 7 p.m. curfew and attacked law enforcement officials in riot gear.
Family members of Floyd joined Wright’s family in solidarity Tuesday, at a press conference posted by Global News, to call for charges against Potter. Minneapolis cop Derek Chauvin is currently on trial for murder in connection with Floyd’s death.
“He said they pulled him over because he had air fresheners hanging from the rearview mirror,” Wright’s mother Katie Wright, who was on the phone with him during the traffic stop, said.
“I heard the phone get either put on the dashboard or dropped, and I heard scuffling, and I heard the police officers say, ‘Daunte, don’t run.’ And then the other officer said, ‘Put the phone down,’” Wright said of the moment before her son was shot dead.
Choices by Robert Cook April 6th 2021
|View this email in your browser|
|Posted March 23rd 2021|
| URGENT ACTION ALERT |
REPEAL THE CORONAVIRUS ACT
This week on Thursday 25th March your MP will have an opportunity to repeal the Coronavirus Act.
If we don’t pressure MPs to repeal this draconian law now, it could remain on the statue books for another 1.5 years.
EMAIL YOUR MP NOW
The Coronavirus Act contains some of the most draconian detention and anti-protest powers in modern legal history and has led to an extraordinary 100% unlawful prosecutions.
It needs to go.
There are two urgent actions you can quickly take:
1) EMAIL YOUR MP
Tell them to repeal the Coronavirus Act. MPs need to know that their constituents care about this Government power grab.
If you haven’t emailed your MP yet, use our quick and easy template now! EMAIL YOUR MP NOW
2) SHARE THIS ACTION WIDELY
The more of us who speak out, the louder our voices become.
If you forward this email action alert widely and share on social media, hundreds more emails will reach MPs. You can also share our new YouTube video, The Biggest Expansion of State Power in Living Memory, which explains just how dangerous the Coronavirus Act is.
We only have a few days left. Without pressure from every single one of us, these powers will remain in force.
The Coronavirus Act is a proven threat to our rights and democracy. Tell your MP it must be repealed.
With thanks as always,
Legal and Policy Officer
|2020 Big Brother Watch. All Rights Reserved.|
Father jailed after referring to biological female child as his daughter Posted March 19th 2021
The warrant was issued by a judge for the arrest of a father after calling his biological female child his “daughter,” and referring to her with the pronouns “she” and “her.” He was found to be in contempt of court.
There is a man in Canada who can only be alluded to as He Who Shall Not Be Named: Robert Hoogland. For the sake of natural justice, it is important to speak this man’s name. He is now the Canadian state’s prisoner of conscience.Advertisement
The warrant was issued by a judge for the arrest of a father after calling his biological female child his “daughter,” and referring to her with the pronouns “she” and “her.” Hoogland was found to be in contempt of court.
Hoogland is a father to a gender non-conforming biological female 14-year-old who identifies as transgender and prefers the use of male pronouns. Hoogland has repeatedly called this person his daughter, though the court has forbade it.
On Tuesday at 10 am Vancouver time, Hoogland surrendered himself to the court in response to the Attorney General of British Columbia’s warrant his arrest for contempt. He was the arrested and jailed. The warrant was issued by Judge Tammen on March 4, 2021
Hoogland opposes his child’s undergoing “gender affirmative” medical procedures, and has stated this opposition again and again, in the hope of saving his child from irreversible harm. The Canadian medical system, the legal system, and the child’s mother press ahead with social and medical transition of the child.
A summary of the gag order:
“ AB, a 14 year old transgender boy, applies for a protection order to restrain his father, CD, from publishing, speaking or giving interviews about this case or about AB’s personal and medical information.Advertisement
“a) CD shall be restrained from: i. attempting to persuade AB to abandon treatment for gender dysphoria; ii. addressing AB by his birth name; and iii. referring to AB as a girl or with female pronouns whether to AB directly or to third parties;
“b) CD shall not directly, or indirectly through an agent or third party, publish or share information or documentation relating to AB’s sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, mental or physical health, medical status or therapies.”
On December 14, 2020, Hoogland was compelled by Justice Mazari’s court to collude in the gender “transitioning” of his fourteen year old daughter and told not to call his biological female child his daughter. In response, Hoogland made a Charter challenge engaging his right to freedom of speech.Advertisement
When he appeared in family court, the judge forced him to sit in the prisoners’ dock, said Hoogland’s lawyer Carey Lind said, even though he was guilty of no crime. The judge referred to him as “the accused.” Lind made an application for the judge to recuse himself on the basis that all of this was prejudicial.
Hoogland told his story. The child had complex problems, but the court blamed them all on gender dysphoria. His marriage to the child’s mother had broken up. He said that, in grades 5 and 6, his daughter was “getting into trouble and hanging out with boys,” so they arranged for her to see the school counsellor. In grade 7, he noticed she cut off her long hair and started wearing a toupé. He said that she developed intense crushes on two male teachers, and made a suicide attempt.
Hoogland discovered that the school had been showing his daughter SOGI 123, the going sexual and gender identity education materials in British Columbia which amounts to transgender ideology “propaganda videos.” In the grade 7 yearbook, the child was referred to by a different name. The school counsellor changed the child’s name without telling her parents. The school “socially transitioned” the biologically female child on its own initiative, with the input of a gender ideologue psychologist, Dr. Wallace Wong.Advertisement
When Hoogland accompanied his child to a consultation with Wong, the psychologist advised the pubescent child to take testosterone. Wong referred the child to the endocrinology unit at the local hospital. Meanwhile, Hoogland was looking for mental health solutions to help the child without drugs.
On the child’s first visits to the hospital, a treatment plan was put into action. Both the child, and her mother—Hoogland’s ex-wife—signed a consent form which explicitly stated that the “treatment” was experimental, meaning that the endocrinologists recommending the treatment didn’t know the long-term health impact.
A gender identity activist lawyer, Barbara Findley, represented the child in court. Justice Boden decided that the child’s best interests lay in destroying her long-term health to make her body appear more like that of a male.Advertisement
Hoogland, in contrast, thinks his daughter’s best interests lie in preserving his child’s health, in case his child ends up among the estimated 85 percent of children who desist in their belief that they are the opposite sex once puberty ends.
He said, “Here I am, sitting there as a parent, watching a perfectly healthy child be destroyed, and there’s nothing I can do but sit on the sideline according to Justice Boden at the time. I can only affirm, or get thrown in jail.”
Boden’s court held that the father’s consent was irrelevant. The judge went a step further, declaring that the girl’s parents must affirm their child’s “gender identity,” and refer to the child as though the fact of her being a gender non-conforming biological female who identifies as transgender means that the child is a boy. If he did not, the parents would be implicated of the criminal offense of family violence.Advertisement
After the hearing, Hoogland gave an interview to The Federalist saying that people cannot change sex, and that mega-doses of exogenous testosterone would damage his vulnerable, biological female child’s health.
Justice Mazari then summarily convicted Hoogland of family violence on the basis that he had declined to use his child’s preferred masculine pronouns. Mazari authorized a warrant for Hoogland’s arrest in the event that he ever used the correct sex pronouns to refer to his daughter again.
“In the Mazari ruling, it said that I can only think thoughts which are contrary to the Boden ruling. The court was gracious enough that they did not police my thoughts, but everything else they could,” he said.Advertisement
In 2019, Hoogland abided by the court order, hoping to get his daughter off testosterone. However, in January 2020, the highest court in British Columbia declared that the child should continue to take testosterone. It also imposed a conduct order on Hoogland that he must continue to refer to his biological female child by male pronouns.
Hoogland said that “They’ve created a delusion, and they’re forcing parents to live in this delusion.”
“What happens when the bubble explodes and the delusion ends… She can never go back to being a girl in the healthy body she should have had… These kids don’t understand. What kind of 13 year old is thinking about having a family and kids?” He said, lamenting his child’s stolen future.Advertisement
Hoogland gave interviews to several Canadian commentators. The broadcasts were suppressed by digital platforms, and he was threatened with contempt of court proceedings.
“What kind of father would I be if, in ten years time she’s detransitioning, and she asks me ‘why didn’t you do anything to stop this? None of your stuck your neck out for me back then.'” He said.
The case continues, as does his child’s medical “transition.”Advertisement
Before surrendering to the court, Hoogland felt compelled to visit his childhood homes, and shared some of his thoughts with this writer.
“Perhaps saving children is a dream . . . but I don’t think so! As I was driving I saw children walking their dogs, I saw children playing together, and I saw a generation that needs their parents more than ever! I visited all my family homes… places where I grew up as a child. I remembered how much I loved my own parents and how much I needed their protection.”
I find it moving that he is willing to go to such lengths to protest what is being inflicted on his daughter in the name of gender identity ideology. His self-sacrifice will hopefully help many other children from being drawn into this terrible industry.Advertisement
The Canadian state has taken a drastically wrong turning by institutionalizing transsexual medical procedures for children, then imposing draconian constraints on free expression to conceal the full horror of what it is doing to a generation of children. It seems unwilling to consider the implications of the decision in Keira Bell v Tavistock in the UK.
In December, the high court handed down the decision in Keira Bell‘s judicial review of the state’s gender identity clinic, the Tavistock. It held that children of 16 and under were incapable of giving informed consent to puberty blockers.
In the judicial review hearing, the court asked the Tavistock why it had no long-term data on the outcomes for the children to whom they gave puberty blockers. It responded that that it had a 2011 study, but it was unpublished pending peer review.Advertisement
The Tavistock then published the data the day after the High Court handed down its judgement, and not in a peer-reviewed journal.
The data confirmed that, between 2011-2020, a rapidly increasing and disproportionate number of girls were referred to the gender clinic with a diagnosis of “gender dysphoria.”
The article highlights the poorly-understood rise in cases of gender dysphoria among adolescents (especially females), and asks if the Western world has gotten the balance wrong by prematurely intervening with medical procedures with irreversible life-long consequences./2 pic.twitter.com/OC5I59eONX— SEGM (@SEGMtweets) December 12, 2020
The clinic had known for nine years that puberty blockers were both ineffective for psychological distress, and harmful to physical health. It chose to keep that information from patients, public, and apparently from the court itself.
I’m still struggling to comprehend how GIDS could have sat on data for 9 years that showed puberty blockers do not improve children’s mental health & may in fact make it worse, when alleviating psychological symptoms is the basis for treatment. How is this not a scandal?— Allison Bailey (@BluskyeAllison) December 12, 2020
The court heard evidence that the Tavistock clinic gave children materials which said “as far as we are aware the blockers will not harm your physical or mental development.”Advertisement
The Tavistock’s study into puberty blockers confirmed that the allegations of Keira Bell and Mrs. A were well-founded.
The refusal to submit this report to the court is further evidence of the @TaviAndPort wish to protect their reputation & win at all costs. When their duty was to submit evidence & assist the court in its ruling about this experimental treatment for vulnerable kids. @hannahsbee https://t.co/37s1sv3Mdn— Marcus Evans (@marcusevanspsyc) December 12, 2020
The study showed that of the 44 children given puberty blockers, only one did not progress to wrong-sex hormones. The Tavistock has claimed that the two “treatments” are not linked, and that taking blockers does not inevitably place children on the medical pathway to wrong-sex hormones and surgery. That claim has been disproven. Blockers are primers for surgery, with lifelong health impacts, not simply a benign “pause button.” They cause long-term damage.Advertisement
The study also found that medical experiments with puberty blockers did not improve the children’s mental health. In fact, the children on puberty blockers felt worse on taking them.
A study has shown all but one child treated for gender dysphoria with puberty-blocking drugs at a leading NHS clinic – The Tavistock and Portman Trust – also received cross-sex hormones.
READ MORE ?#Newsnight | @hannahsbee | @deb_cohen cohenhttps://t.co/yt5rNx1DMi— BBC Newsnight (@BBCNewsnight) December 11, 2020
Preliminary findings which showed that after a year on blockers, there was a significant increase in those answering the statement: “I deliberately try to hurt or kill myself,” were not replicated across the duration of the study.Advertisement
The children given blockers also lost critical bone density and height which they can never recover, leaving them vulnerable to osteoporosis and broken bones.
The study was nine years late, in which time thousands of children were primed for “gender affirmation” surgeries, and lumbered with iatrogenic osteoporosis and stunted growth.
It remains to be seen whether the court pursues the matter of the Tavistock’s suppression of vital data which could have spared all of those vulnerable children the lifelong effects of puberty blockers.Advertisement
All of this begs the question of why Justin Trudeau and Minster David Lametti continue to push Bill C16, knowing full well where it leads: destroying the health of vulnerable children for the sake of a delusion.
Keira Bell’s case is international news, and shows anyone who cares to listen what awaits the victims of the trans “healthcare” industry. Bell described the Tavistock as having “a complacent and dangerous culture” which caused her irreversible harm. Its activities have effectively been shut down by the court ruling.
Rob Hoogland’s child may not have the same experience as Keira Bell, who, now in her early twenties, regrets that she may be unable to become a mother. She hopes that it will no longer be standard practice for gender clinics to withhold from girls that “treatment” means they may never be mothers.Advertisement
However, with a four-in-five chance of desisting, and incontrovertible evidence that “gender-affirming” medical experiments harm the body and fail to help mental wellbeing, what reasonable adult could now argue that she should stay on that path?
We watch the Hoogland case develop with interest, and hope that his arrest and imprisonment may precipitate a watershed moment in drawing national attention to the atrocity of pediatric transitioning.
The way Hoogland’s child is described herein is intended to conform with Canadian laws against hate speech.
Police give grandmother, 82, a warning after she enjoyed a cup of TEA with a neighbour in their shared garden during lockdown Posted Here March 19th 2021
- 82-year-old woman warned by police over socially distanced tea with neighbour
- Gloucester Police officers arrived to speak with her when she was tucked in bed
- She was reported for drinking tea outside with others in breach of restrictions
Published: 22:34, 18 March 2021 | Updated: 10:59, 19 March 2021
2.2k shares 4.8k View comments
A pensioner was given a police warning after she had a socially distanced cup of tea with her neighbours in their communal garden.
Officers turned up at the 82-year-old’s sheltered housing complex home at 9.45pm to question her about the incident – after she’d settled into bed to watch television.
They told her she had been reported for drinking tea outside with her neighbours, in breach of coronavirus lockdown restrictions.
Yesterday, her daughter Lesley Magovern, 56, said that she had been disgusted by the police action.
A pensioner was given a police warning after she had a socially distanced cup of tea with her neighbours in their communal garden (stock image)
‘My mother heard a knock at the door and it was very late and she wondered really who it could be,’ she said.
‘My mother is quite deaf and she asked who it was and she thought the voice said “It’s me”. Then mother assumed it was in fact me and she then opened the door.
‘There were two officers stood there, a man and a woman with masks on and they asked if they could come in and speak to her.
‘They did not show her any identification so she just trusted the uniform and she was quite frightened. My mother has never been in trouble with the police in her life.’
Mrs Magovern – who has declined to name her mother to protect her from repercussions – said she had had a socially distanced cup of tea with three other residents from her complex in Charlton Kings, Gloucestershire, at 1.30pm on March 9. She added: ‘I cannot believe the police travelled from Gloucester to Charlton Kings so late for something so ridiculous.
‘When they were there, they told my mother if it were to happen again she would be fined.
‘Then they asked her to provide identification so she was rooting around trying to find some. Finally she ended up showing them an out-of-date driving licence as that is all she had.’
She added her mother did not deserve the warning from police and had been unreasonably disturbed late in the evening. ‘I made a complaint to the police station. As soon as my mum opened the door the worst things began racing through her mind.’ Mrs Magovern said. ‘I really do not understand why the police thought a few elderly folk drinking tea, socially distanced in a communal garden, is a priority.+2
Officers turned up at the 82-year-old’s sheltered housing complex home at 9.45pm to question her about the incident – after she’d settled into bed to watch television (stock image)
‘My son works for the London Met and even he could not believe what I was telling him.
‘We all have been left thinking, what a waste of police resources.’
The officers tasked with visiting Mrs Magovern’s mother were part of the force’s coronavirus response team.
A Gloucestershire Police spokesman said: ‘An officer has spoken to the complainant and an explanation was provided in response to concerns raised. She was content with this and the matter has been resolved.
‘Police received a report of a potential Covid breach on Tuesday 9 March at 1.30pm suspecting that there was a gathering involving people from multiple households in a residential garden in Charlton Kings, Cheltenham.
‘Covid response officers attended later that day at around 9.45pm where some residents were spoken to and given words of advice around current restrictions.
‘Officers are deployed to incidents based on an assessment of the threat, risk and harm of the incident and in this case officers who are part of the Covid response team and are deployed across the county attended later that evening.’