Human Racism & Like a Black Person Would – Robert Cook April 17th 2021
Believe that , believe anything , posted by F.S For RCONB , April 13th 2021
Are the world’s public only sheep waiting to be slaughtered by their leaders?
Man Finds Out Government is Lying on a Monumental Scale, But Still Thinks They’re Doing GoodApril 12, 2021Rob Slane A man who spent last year believing everything the Government and media said about Covid-19 and Lockdowns, only to find out that none of the things he’d believed are true, has announced his continued belief that they must be acting out of purely altruistic motives.
Brian Sprocket, a 38-year-old teaching assistant from Barnsley, spent most of last year staying home, wearing a mask on the few occasions he ventured out, and ensuring he stayed away from all human beings, whom he regarded as walking virus carriers. But at the beginning of this year, he was forced to think for the first time about what was going on, after his television stopped working.
With nothing to watch, Brian decided to look at an email sent to him by a friend last autumn, which he had previously dismissed as a conspiracy theory: “The email claimed that asymptomatic transmission was a myth, based almost entirely on one false case in Germany. To my amazement, when I actually did a bit of research for the first time in nearly a year, I realised that this claim, which Governments around the world had used as the pretext for Lockdowns, masks, social distancing, and, well everything, wasn’t actually true.”
From there, nothing could hold Brian back from his new found quest for the truth. Having previously believed that the quarantining of millions of healthy people for months on end was a normal health policy that had been used since time immemorial, he was shocked to find out that this wasn’t the case at all, and that normal practice was to quarantine the sick: “I must admit, I felt a bit of a numpty when I found that out. I suppose it’s obvious when you think about it, but I suppose at least I wasn’t the only one who fell for it.”
From there, Brian entered a whole new world of truth discovery. For instance, he was amazed to find out that the authorities had been lying about PCR testing, which even its inventor said should never be used as a clinical diagnostic tool. He was also shocked to find out the truth about the lethality of Covid-19, which he had been convinced was roughly the same as Bubonic Plague, which had killed up to 60% of the populations it infected:
“All through 2020,” he said, “I’d been sending angry and sneering Tweets to those claiming Covid-19 was not much different to a bad seasonal flu, calling them names like Covidiots and Covid Deniers, that sort of thing. But back in February, I came across a paper by one of the world’s most cited epidemiologists, Stanford University’s John Ioannidis, who found that the Infection Fatality Rate of Covid-19 is around 0.23% — roughly the same as a bad flu. This was accepted by the World Health Organisation.
You’d think finding out that Covid-19 isn’t the Plague would be reassuring, but I must admit I found it all a bit unnerving.” After going on to discover that the vaccines aren’t really vaccines, but experimental gene therapies that haven’t completed their clinical trials, Brian started to write a stern letter to his MP, telling her he’d never vote for her again if she didn’t start holding the Government to account, oppose Vaccine Passports, and demand our freedoms back.
However, just as he was completing it, his TV was returned from the repair shop, and after turning it on to watch the latest Government briefing, he forgot everything he’d found out over the past few weeks, and instead expressed his anger at those who refuse to wear masks, who don’t wish to be “vaccinated”, and who are sounding the alarm about Vaccine Passports: “I can’t believe those stupid tinfoil hat wearing Covidiots and Vaccine Deniers,” he said from under his triple mask. “Don’t they realise there’s a deadly virus about and the Government is just trying to do its best to keep us safe. All we need to do is keep following the rules, stay apart from each other, keep your distance, keep masking up, make sure we don’t mess it up now, get the vax, follow the science, behave responsibly….”
Alien Life Posted April 7th 2021
Here’s what the WHO report found on the origins of COVID-19 Posted April 5th 2021
The long-awaited report answers some questions. But experts warn that discovering the virus’ true origins will take more digging.ByJillian KramerPublished March 31, 2021• 5 min read
A World Health Organization report released today says that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, most likely leapt from animals to humans through an emissary animal.
The dispatch marks the culmination of a month-long mission by a team of Chinese and international experts to uncover COVID-19’s true origins. According to the report, it’s probable the virus originated in a bat or pangolin before making the leap to people. The report also says that it’s “extremely unlikely” the highly transmissible virus escaped from a laboratory in China.
“All hypotheses remain on the table,” Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO’s director general, said in a statement released today, indicating the organization’s research is ongoing.
While the 120-page report resolves some queries, it leaves others unanswered, including the geographic origin of the virus and exactly how it infected the first human. The methods used to gather physical evidence, as well as the way the report was written and compiled, have also raised alarm bells, causing some experts to question its credibility and to urge for more transparency in future studies.
“This report is a very important beginning, but it is not the end,” Ghebreyesus said, adding that until the source of the virus is found, “we must continue to follow the science and leave no stone unturned as we do.”
Path to infection
Most scientists are not surprised by the report’s conclusion that SARS-CoV-2 most likely jumped from an infected bat or pangolin to another animal and then to a human.
“This is what many of us thought all along,” says Ian Lipkin, director of the Center for Infection and Immunity at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. But Lipkin adds that it’s “still speculative, because they haven’t identified an intermediary animal.” The report authors suggest examining supply chains from both livestock and wildlife farms to public markets to try and find out exactly which animals were involved.
If an intermediate host is part of the virus’ transmission chain, then it will be important to identify it so that mitigation measures can be put in place to prevent future outbreaks, says Theodora Hatziioannou, an associate professor of virology at Rockefeller University in New York City.
The report outlines another likely transmission scenario: that the virus leapt directly from a bat to a human. Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane University School of Medicine who has studied the virus’s origin based on its genome, says such an event “is not too big a stretch.”
However, the report questions whether the Huanan market was the location where the first animal-to-human transmission occurred, as some believed. The earliest reported case of COVID-19 did not have any link to the market. That suggests no firm conclusion can be drawn yet about the role of the Huanan market in the origin of the outbreak, or how the infection might have been introduced there, according to the report.
The hypothesis that frozen foods packaged and sold in markets might have played a role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission was also addressed. The report authors determined this so-called cold-chain route was possible and called for further case-control studies of outbreaks involving frozen products. They also recommended examining cold-chain products sold in the Huanan market from December 2019—if any are still available.
The report concludes that it was “extremely unlikely” the virus leaked from a Wuhan laboratory, a hypothesis propagated by former president Donald Trump but not often entertained by scientists. Robert Redfield, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, continued to spread the idea as recently as last week during a CNN interview.
“There is no record of viruses closely related to SARS-CoV-2 in any laboratory” before the first cases of COVID-19 were recorded in December 2019, the WHO report says, with the authors adding that the risk of accidentally introducing the novel coronavirus in a laboratory setting by infecting a human “is extremely low.” The report does not call for additional research into the possibility of a leak from one of Wuhan’s laboratories.
“The preliminary conclusions are not outrageous, and they make perfect sense,” Hatziioannou says. “I know a lot of people would like to think it escaped from the lab, but I find conspiracy theories like that extremely hard to believe.”
Setbacks and scrutiny
However, the report is already facing scrutiny. Although it’s a joint effort between Chinese and WHO officials, investigators representing the WHO were denied permission to visit the Wuhan market and collect other data in the initial phases of the research, leading some pundits to say that the WHO was ceding responsibility to China, its second biggest funder behind the United States.
China also held back information about the initial outbreak in Wuhan, which delayed the WHO’s investigation.
Today, a joint statement issued by the governments of 14 countries, including the U.S., raised concerns about the transparency of future research into the origins of the novel virus.
“It is critical for independent experts to have full access to all pertinent human, animal, and environmental data, research, and personnel involved in the early stages of the outbreak relevant to determining how this pandemic emerge,” the statement reads.
Despite the study’s setbacks, Tulane University’s Garry believes the WHO report is credible. “It’s a very detailed report—it’s not the type of data you can make up,” he says.
Lipkin agrees: “It’s thorough, it’s exhaustive, it’s well written,” he says. “It’s what we predicted. That’s not to say that it wasn’t important to do this, but there’s nothing here to say, Ah-ha, I never thought this would be the case.”
Oh What A Piece Of Work Is Man – posted by Robert Cook April 3rd 2021
Theories of Rape
1. BIOLOGICAL THEORY: Randy Thornhill, The Biology of Human Rape, 39 Jurimetrics J. 137(1999) at 143:
Selection, or differential reproductive success among individuals due to trait differences, is the most reasonable ultimate explanation for rape in humans. Presumably, all evolution leading to adaptation [FN26] has been driven by inter-individual selection, and not by intergroup selection. Evidence for this is vast, and is seen in the functional designs of adaptations. Adaptations’ benefactors are individuals who bear them and the genes that code for them. There is no example of adaptation that has evolved because it promotes group survival or reproductive success. If group success is promoted by adaptation, it is merely a by-product, and not the reason the adaptation evolved.
The inter-individual selection responsible for rape may have been direct or indirect. [FN27] In the case of direct selection for rape, selection may have favored raping because rape had a net positive effect on rapists’ reproductive success. *144 Despite its costs, rape increased mate number and thereby reproductive success of males. If so, there is a psychological adaptation in men for rape that is specific to rape. Because women have mate choice adaptations leading them to prefer protective mates with status and resources, as well as to prefer mates with specific physical features such as body symmetry that mark inherited health, [FN28] we can infer that rape, by circumventing female mate choice, increased males’ mate number in human evolutionary history.
Finding such a specific adaptation is strong evidence that direct selection pressure for the adaptation’s function brought about the evolution of the adaptation. [FN29] This does not, however, imply that rape currently promotes the reproductive success of individuals. Indeed, whether rape is an adaptation–a product of past selection–is unrelated to whether rape is currently adaptive. The issues are distinct. [FN30]
In the case of indirect selection for rape, rape is an incidental effect of direct selection for male sexual traits other than rape. More precisely, rape is a byproduct of men’s adaptation for pursuit of casual, non-committal, consensual sex. This pursuit was selected because it increased male mate number and because men’s investment for offspring production is minimal. Put another way, rape evolved incidentally due to direct selection for obtaining a large number of consensual partners without romantic commitment.
At this point in time, we do not know which is true–whether rape reflects rape-specific adaptation or arises incidentally out of an adaptation for pursuit of consensual sexual variety. On theoretical grounds, however, the rape-specific adaptation hypothesis is more likely. This is because of the large costs of raping to the rapist and thus the expectation that rape exists because of rape’s overcompensating benefits to male reproductive success in human evolutionary history. Furthermore, rape appears to have existed in human evolutionary history, as seen in women’s adaptation to deal with rape. [FN31] Even today, rape is common. Selection has not eliminated this costly behavior.
—-page 145: There are at least six hypothetical psychological rape adaptations: (1) a psychological mechanism linking the vulnerability of victims to the use of rape by men; (2) a psychological mechanism linking the lack of resources (or the associated variable of a lack of sexual access to females) to the use of rape by men; (3) a psychological mechanism causing males to have a different preference (in terms of sexual attractiveness as indicated by age) in rape victims than in consensual sexual partners; (4) a psychological-physiological mechanism producing changes in the sperm count of ejaculates during rape (or to depictions of rape) that show specific functional design for rape; (5) a psychological mechanism producing differences in the arousal of males to depictions of rapes than to consensual matings; (6) a psychological-physiological mechanism producing marital rape as a sperm competition tactic.
These putative mechanisms are not mutually exclusive. More than one of these mechanisms, or all six of them, could exist as part of men’s sexual psychological adaptation to rape. In addition, the adaptations might appear only in certain men in what biologists refer to as a frequency-dependent mix of adaptations…
pg 146: The resource-deprivation hypothesis cannot, however, explain all rape. Indeed, there are many instances of rape by high-status or physically attractive men with consensual-sex access to many women. Presumably, rape by men with resources and status arises from a different rape-specific adaptation. For example, according to the first hypothesis many men will rape when the perceived benefits exceed the perceived costs.
Despite efforts by feminists to reject biological theory and portray rape as a crime of socially constructed domination, theorists continue to put forth accounts describing men as suffering from irresistible forces that compel them to rape:
Anthropologist Craig Palmer of the University of Colorado and biologist Randy Thornhill of the University of New Mexico plan to pulblish a book A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion, scheduled for
release in April by MIT Press. Refuting claims that rape is a crime of male domination, which has evoleved as a form of male reproductive behavior. They write that social scientists promote “erroneous solutions” to rape because they incorrectly view the crime as controlled by deviant urges to control and dominate, not by sexual desire. The scientists suggest that women should take steps to deter irrepressible male impulses by not dressing provocatively or participating in unsupervised dating. But they do not equate “natural” as good and agree that their public mission is to make rape extinct as a trait in human beings. The two contend that current thinking causes of rape fail in refusing to acknowledge that by definition rape requires sexual arousal of the rapist. For more on their work, read Scientists: Rape not about power, but sex, Scripps Howard News Service Found on the Web at: http://www.hoosiertimes.com/stories/2000/01/11/news.000111_A4_MCW80871.sto. (optional reading)
But Darwinian biological theorists remind readers that the discovery of biological bases for destructive human behaviors (such as rape) does not imply social acceptance of such behaviors:
First, to say something is a product of natural selection is not say that it is unchangeable; just about any manifestation of human nature can be changed, given an apt alteration of the environment — though the required alteration will in some cases be prohibitively drastic. Second, to say that something is “natural” is not to say that it is good. There is no reason to adopt natural selection’s “values” as our own. But presumably if we want to pursue values that are a t odds with natural selection’s, we need to know what we’re up against. If we want to change some disconcertingly stubborn parts of our moral code, it would help to know where they come from. And where they ultimately come from is human nature, however complexly that nature is refracted by the many layers of circumstance and cultural inheritance through which it passes. Robert Wright, THE MORAL ANIMAL, New York: Vintage Books, 1994 at 31.
2. COMMODIFICATION THEORY: Some theorists have posited rape as a crime of property, in which sex is a commodity which is stolen from a woman by a rapist. Baker clearly describes such a theory in:
Katharine K. Baker, Once a Rapist? Motivational Evidence and Relevancy in Rape Law, 110 Harv. L. Rev. 563 (1997).
2. *603 For some, sex is a commodity, [FN223] and if sex is a commodity, then taking it is theft. The definitions of lovemaking discussed above may attempt to resist the classification of sex as a commodity, but most people rarely, if ever, discuss the personal, intimate, and shared experiences of sex. We live in a culture that rarely discusses sex as anything other than a commodity. Indeed, the more objectified and commodified the conversation, the easier it is for most people –especially young people–to talk about sex. [FN224] Some people are never able to talk about the int imate aspects of sex, even if they do understand them. It is hardly surprising that most young people neither talk about nor understand sexual intimacy.
Instead, youths, particularly young men, are bombarded by a culture that sexualizes commodities and commodifies women’s sexuality. Companies sell products by selling the sexuality of the women endorsing the product. [FN225] The product and the sex are purposefully conflated. Sex is also purposefully commodified. Men can easily buy sex, even though all but one state prohibit prostitution. [FN226] Men can also buy pornography and purchase tickets to peep shows. What motivates many rapists may not be substantively different from that which motivates men who go to prostitutes or purchase tickets to peep shows. None of these acts requires mutual enjoyment or emotional intimacy, and they are all called sex. Thus, men are able to satisfy a desire for sex without having to incorporate the complexities of sexually intimate communication.
*604 This cultural endorsement and marketing of sex as a commodified good leads to an increased desire for, and sense of entitlement to, sex. [FN227] Most men are taught that sexual desire is like hunger: when it is there, you satisfy it. Women are candybars. Of course, food is not free and neither is sex, but precisely because men can and do pay for sex, [FN228] taking it without consent becomes much less morally reprehensible than other violent crimes. Thus, itis not surprising that one study found that thirty-nine percent of convicted rapists were caught in the course of a robbery. [FN229] As many of these men conceded, they raped because she was there. [FN230] They were already breaking the laws of trespass and ownership–why not take one more thing?
Men know that taking sex without consent is wrong, but many men do not perceive it as really bad. The relationship between alcohol and rape demonstrates this point. In one study of college men who had committed sexual assault, seventy-five percent said that they had used alcohol or drugs prior to the assault. [FN231] Another study of convicted rapists found a comparable seventy-five percent who admitted to using drugs 20 or alcohol prior to the attack. [FN232] All of the college gang rapes that were analyzed in a 1985 study involved alcohol. [FN233] This direct relationship between alcohol use and rape exists, despite clear scientific evidence showing that “[a]lcohol disinhibits psychological sexual arousal and suppresses physiological responding.” [FN234] What may explain the correspondence between alcohol use and rape therefore is not alcohol’s affect on sex drive, but rather alcohol’s tendency to decrease inhibitions against taking that to which one has no right. Teenagers get drunk and go get sex in the same way that they get high and go to the 7-11 to shoplift candybars. They know it is wrong, but it is not that bad. Most adolescents do not get drunk and go rob banks. They do not get drunk and commit murder. They do get *605 drunk and break little rules. They shoplift and joyride and vandalize. The rule against raping, particularly date raping, is like the rule against shoplifting–it is a little rule. [FN235]
Besides the commodification theme, Baker also discusses the connection between sex and lovemaking, and the related finding that some men rape because they want sex. She also reviews the theme of dividing– that men rape women in order to establish power over, or distinction from, other men. Finally she reviwes men who rape as a form of expressing control, anger or sadism.
3. DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY: From N.M. Malamuth & M.F. Heilmann, Evolutionary Psychology and Sexual Aggression, in HANDBOOK OF EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY 515-42 (C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs eds., 1998):
Malamuth and colleagues propose that rape proneness among men is proximately caused not by genetic variation, but by developmental events involving learning. Their analyses indicate that rape-prone men come from harsh developmental backgrounds involving impersonal and short-term social relationships, and backgrounds in which manipulation, coercion, and violence are valid ways of conducting social relationships.
Malamuth began his research program in sexual aggression from a feminist perspective but decided that issues of rape, power, and control could not be sufficiently explained without evolutionary concepts. Based on his extensive empirical research, 20 two interacting pathways resulting in sexual aggression have been identified. The impersonal sex pathway is characterized by association with delinquent peers, introduction to sexual activity at a young age, and having many sexual partners. The hostile masculinity pathway is related to an insecure sense of masculinity, hostility, distrust, and a desire to dominate women. From Stephen Gold’s review of: Sex, Power, Conflict: Evolutionary and Feminist Perspectives, Edited by David M. Buss and Neil M. Malamuth. Oxford University, Press, New York, 1996
4. RAPE AS A GENDER-BASED HATE CRIME
Please read this excerpt from Goldscheid, Julie, Gender-Motivated Violence: Developing a Meaningful Paradigm for Civil Rights Enforcement, 2 Harv. Women’s L.J. 123 (footnotes ommited), 146: “[F]orced sexual contact in the name of passion or personality may support rather than refute
a claim of gender-motivation because it shows a disrespect for women. [FN130] … [There is] research
indicating that acquaintance rapes frequently are premeditated and are predicated on discriminatory biases
about male entitlement to coerce sexual relations with women against their will. [FN131]
In addition to the workplace sexual assaults and the gang rapes analyzed in the first VAWA Civil Rights
Remedy cases, sexual assault and domestic violence situations may contain other evidence that reflects *147
gender-motivation. A perpetrator may have uttered gender-derogatory epithets such as “bitch,”
“slut,” or “whore” in the course of committing a violent act. He may have made comments that reflect
anti-female bias such as those cited in the Brzonkala case. [FN132] A defendant may have made derogatory
comments about a woman’s physiology or may have mutilated her genitals during an assault. In acquaintance
rape cases, a defendant may have disregarded a woman’s protests, reflecting the stereotypical view that “no”
means “yes” that underlies much violence against women. [FN133] Or a defendant may have committed serial
rapes or participated in gang rapes. [FN134]”
5. CONTROL THEORY: Examining rape not as an matter of sexuality, but rather as an expression of control, feminist scholars have challenged current understandings of rape law to change the focus to acknowledge the control issues involved.
From Stephen R. Gold’s review of: Sex, Power, Conflict: Evolutionary and Feminist Perspectives, Edited by David M. Buss and Neil M. Malamuth. Oxford University, Press, New York, 1996:
The issue of whether rape should be conceptualized as sexual or violent behavior is carefully examined by Muehlenhard et al. The authors discuss the question from the perspective of the victim and perpetrator, and further break down the issue into whether the motivation, consequence, or experience of the assault is being discussed. The authors recommend moving the issue beyond sex versus violence to a focus on control. They suggest defining sexual coercion on the basis not of whether the woman was a victim of violence but of whether she freely consented to the activity. The issue of consent is intertwined with the role of alcohol in sexual aggression.Abbey et al. discuss the link between alcohol use and sexual aggression. The evidence suggests that in almost 50% of the incidents of sexual aggression, alcohol has been used by one person and, most often, by both individuals. Drinking alcohol on a date establishes expectancies in men and women that can turn into self-fulfilling prophecies. According to Abbey et al., alcohol makes general role stereotypes more salient and available as excuses for inappropriate behavior. Using alcohol complicates the issue of consent. At what point in the process of moving toward inebriation is a woman no longer able to provide consent? Is drinking with a man who has expressed an interest in sexual activity a form of implicit sexual consent?
The final chapter presenting a feminist perspective deals with the impact of the threat of rape on women’s self-esteem, trust in others, and perception of personal control. Bohner and Schwarz note that a greater belief in gender inequality is associated with a higher frequency of rape, at both the individual and the societal level. To examine the causal pathways in this association, they have studied the impact of thinking about rape prior to a task and the subsequent effect on dependent variables such as self-esteem. Bohner and Schwarz conclude that their findings support the feminist claim that rape and rape myths contribute to gender inequality. By having to worry about and guard against being raped, coupled with culturally supported myths about rape, women are restricted in their behavior and intimidated into feeling less good abou
State Police & Police State posted by F.S , Political Editor March 29th 2021
|New post on winter oak What are they trying to do to us? by winter oak A brief overview Life has become very strange indeed for billions of people since March 2020. We are no longer allowed to do what we always did, see who we want to see, live freely in the way we fondly imagined we were entitled to do. Everything has changed. Now we have to check the latest restrictions on our movements and activities. We can’t go to concerts, football matches, pubs or cafés. We are told to avoid other people and to wear masks to cover our faces when we do share the same spaces. Nobody knows what the future holds for them or their family. Insecurity and anxiety are rife. To start with, these were supposedly emergency measures, but the weeks turned into months without any end in sight. Now we are being told that it could be years before we are allowed to resume our lives and even then we are going to need a “vaccine passport” to carry out even the most basic activities. So what is this all about? What are they trying to do to us? The official story, of course, is that is all because of a virus, a contagion so deadly that everything had to be put on indefinite hold. But more and more people are latching on to the fact that something is not quite right in all this, that we have been “played” for some hidden purpose. While they might still disagree over the exact origins or severity of Covid, they are coming together in the realisation that it has been used as an excuse to usher in a new type of society – the New Normal that the authorities have been going on about since the very start. But what kind of world is it that they want to force us into? Some significant clues come from reading and analysing the words of Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Switzerland, whose annual Davos conferences have for decades been bringing together business leaders and politicians from all around the globe. Schwab has long been promoting something called the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which is basically a digital society where absolutely everything, and everyone, is connected to the internet (“inclusivity”). In his 2016 book The Fourth Industrial Revolution, he describes it as “unlike anything humankind has experienced before”, (1) “a revolution that is fundamentally changing the way we live, work, and relate to one another”. (2) He enthuses about “billions of people connected by mobile devices”, and about robotics, 3D printing and nanotechnology which would all “build on and amplify each other in a fusion of technologies across the physical, digital and biological worlds”. (3) Schwab also looks forward to more online education, involving “the use of virtual and augmented reality” to “dramatically improve educational outcomes”, (4) to sensors “installed in homes, clothes and accessories, cities, transport and energy networks” (5) and to smart cities, with their all-important “data platforms”. (6) Some of what Schwab describes is frankly very disturbing, such as when he talks about technological devices becoming “implantable in our bodies and brains” and about us being able to “manipulate our own genes, and those of our children”. (7) “Where do we draw the line between human and machine?” asks Schwab. “What does it mean to be human?” (8) Most of us, of course, know perfectly well what it means to be human and have no desire whatsoever to be merged with a machine! Schwab is well aware that his transhumanist vision is an unpopular and minority one and mutters darkly in his books about “societal resistance” (9) and how to advance “if technologies receive a great deal of resistance from the public”. (10) So imagine his delight when, a few months after his WEF hosted an event acting out an imaginary global pandemic, (11) the Covid crisis provided the perfect excuse to sweep aside all that inconvenient public resistance! Now was the ideal time to launch what Schwab himself calls “The Great Reset” and he immediately rushed out a book, Covid-19: The Great Reset, to celebrate his good fortune. (12) Strangely enough, Schwab and co-author Thierry Malleret admit that Covid-19 is “one of the least deadly pandemics the world has experienced over the last 2000 years”, adding that “the consequences of COVID-19 in terms of health and mortality will be mild compared to previous pandemics”. (13) They add: “It does not constitute an existential threat, or a shock that will leave its imprint on the world’s population for decades”. (14) Yet, incredibly, this “mild” illness is simultaneously presented as the excuse for unprecedented social change under the banner of “The Great Reset”! “It is our defining moment”, they crow. “Many things will change forever”. “A new world will emerge”. (15) “The societal upheaval unleashed by COVID-19 will last for years, and possibly generations”. (16) “Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal. The short response is: never”. (17) For Schwab, Covid-19 means full steam ahead for everything he has been wanting to foist upon us for years under the label of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. He and Malleret report with satisfaction that “the pandemic will fast-forward the adoption of automation in the workplace and the introduction of more robots in our personal and professional lives”. (18) They are delighted with the “accelerating growth of e-commerce”, (19) with the “ever-more powerful expansion of e-sports”, (20) with the boom in online banking transactions (21) and with the fact that, thanks to Covid, “the world of education, like for so many other industries, will become partly virtual”. (22) They declare chirpily: “Our lingering and possibly lasting fear of being infected with a virus (COVID-19 or another) will thus speed the relentless march of automation, particularly in the fields most susceptible to automation”. (23) But why is all this so important for Schwab? What is it that makes him and his WEF pals so eager to push through the Great Reset, the New Normal and the Fourth Industrial Revolution on the back of Covid? It is all about money and power, which are essentially the same thing in the degraded modern society in which we live. On the most basic level, a certain type of business stands to make a lot of money from lockdown culture. As Schwab and Malleret are pleased to note: “The combined market value of the leading tech companies hit record after record during the lockdowns… this phenomenon is unlikely to abate any time soon, quite the opposite”. (24) There is also the massive global shift of wealth from public purse to private hands that has been justified by Covid. Another bail-out for the 0.1%. Schwab and Malleret gloat: “In April 2020, just as the pandemic began to engulf the world, governments across the globe had announced stimulus programmes amounting to several trillion dollars, as if eight or nine Marshall Plans had been put into place almost simultaneously”. (25) But there is something even more insidious behind all this. The Great Reset is, ultimately, about resetting the capitalist economy by allowing it to expand into new realms, to privatise and exploit new “products” that it could not previously reach. Those “products” are us, our lives and our world – human and natural “capital”. Schwab hints at this agenda in his books when he writes about “new ways of creating value” (26) and looks forward to “an explosion in tradable assets, as all kinds of value exchange can be hosted on the blockchain”. (27) What he is referring to is “impact investment“, a scam through which hedge fund speculators aim to make phenomenal amounts of money by gambling on people’s lives. In order to be able to package us all up into “products” that can be processed by the algorithms and data bases of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, everything we do has to be digital. Our identities and lives have to be constructed online so they can be used as the basis for the new capitalism. The worst thing about impact capitalism is that it hides behind the pretence of doing good. It clings to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and uses all the correct language to make itself acceptable for people who see themselves as progressive. So we have the nauseating spectacle of Sir Ronald Cohen, notorious capitalist shark and Tony Blair’s banker, claiming piously that impact capitalism “will lead us to a new and better world” (28) by “helping those in need and preserving our planet”. (29) This, alongside all the virtue-signalling moral self-righteousness surrounding Covid, makes it hard for people to see the vile reality behind what is being planned. Those promoting the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Great Reset employ armies of “journalists” and “fact-checkers” to hide the truth and dismiss researchers and dissidents as “conspiracy theorists”. We all know how difficult it is to persuade even friends and family to look beyond the mass media propaganda and find out what is really happening. But this is what we have to do, in every way we can. The stakes are too great here, to simply turn away and hope it will all turn out all right in the end. Schwab, Cohen and the like are herding us into a digital prison camp and if we don’t soon snap out of our collective complacency and make a bolt for freedom, future generations don’t stand a chance in hell of living decent and dignfied human lives. Get informed! Explore our Great Reset online library 1. Klaus Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Geneva: WEF, 2016), e-book. 3% [e-book equivalent of page number]|
2. Ibid. 3%
3. Ibid. 3%
4. Klaus Schwab with Nicholas Davis, Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Guide to Building a Better World (Geneva: WEF, 2018), e-book. 20%
5. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. 12%
6. Ibid. 79%
7. Schwab, Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 9%
8. Ibid. 9%
9. Ibid. 17%
10. Ibid. 17%
12. Klaus Schwab, Thierry Malleret, Covid-19: The Great Reset (Geneva: WEF, 2020), e-book.
13. Ibid. 89%
14. Ibid. 89%
15. Ibid. 2%
16. Ibid. 26%
17. Ibid. 2%
18. Ibid. 57%
19. Ibid. 64%
20. Ibid. 74%
21. Ibid. 64%
22. Ibid. 73%
23. Ibid. 55%
24. Ibid. 73%
25. Ibid. 32%
26. Schwab, Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 1%
27. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. 85%
28. Ronald Cohen, Impact: Reshaping Capitalism to Drive Real Change (London: Ebury Press, 2020). E-book. 2%
29. Ibid. 78% winter oak | March 29, 2021 at 4:55 pm | Tags: Fourth Industrial Revolution, Great Reset, impact capitalism, Klaus Schwab | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: https://wp.me/p5HzSy-1Hn Comment See all comments Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from winter oak.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
|New post on winter oak|
What are they trying to do to us?
by winter oak
A brief overview
Life has become very strange indeed for billions of people since March 2020.
We are no longer allowed to do what we always did, see who we want to see, live freely in the way we fondly imagined we were entitled to do.
Everything has changed. Now we have to check the latest restrictions on our movements and activities. We can’t go to concerts, football matches, pubs or cafés. We are told to avoid other people and to wear masks to cover our faces when we do share the same spaces.
Nobody knows what the future holds for them or their family. Insecurity and anxiety are rife.
To start with, these were supposedly emergency measures, but the weeks turned into months without any end in sight.
Now we are being told that it could be years before we are allowed to resume our lives and even then we are going to need a “vaccine passport” to carry out even the most basic activities.
So what is this all about? What are they trying to do to us?
The official story, of course, is that is all because of a virus, a contagion so deadly that everything had to be put on indefinite hold.
But more and more people are latching on to the fact that something is not quite right in all this, that we have been “played” for some hidden purpose.
While they might still disagree over the exact origins or severity of Covid, they are coming together in the realisation that it has been used as an excuse to usher in a new type of society – the New Normal that the authorities have been going on about since the very start.
But what kind of world is it that they want to force us into?
Some significant clues come from reading and analysing the words of Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Switzerland, whose annual Davos conferences have for decades been bringing together business leaders and politicians from all around the globe.
Schwab has long been promoting something called the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which is basically a digital society where absolutely everything, and everyone, is connected to the internet (“inclusivity”).
In his 2016 book The Fourth Industrial Revolution, he describes it as “unlike anything humankind has experienced before”, (1) “a revolution that is fundamentally changing the way we live, work, and relate to one another”. (2)
He enthuses about “billions of people connected by mobile devices”, and about robotics, 3D printing and nanotechnology which would all “build on and amplify each other in a fusion of technologies across the physical, digital and biological worlds”. (3)
Schwab also looks forward to more online education, involving “the use of virtual and augmented reality” to “dramatically improve educational outcomes”, (4) to sensors “installed in homes, clothes and accessories, cities, transport and energy networks” (5) and to smart cities, with their all-important “data platforms”. (6)
Some of what Schwab describes is frankly very disturbing, such as when he talks about technological devices becoming “implantable in our bodies and brains” and about us being able to “manipulate our own genes, and those of our children”. (7)
“Where do we draw the line between human and machine?” asks Schwab. “What does it mean to be human?” (8)
Most of us, of course, know perfectly well what it means to be human and have no desire whatsoever to be merged with a machine!
Schwab is well aware that his transhumanist vision is an unpopular and minority one and mutters darkly in his books about “societal resistance” (9) and how to advance “if technologies receive a great deal of resistance from the public”. (10)
So imagine his delight when, a few months after his WEF hosted an event acting out an imaginary global pandemic, (11) the Covid crisis provided the perfect excuse to sweep aside all that inconvenient public resistance!
Now was the ideal time to launch what Schwab himself calls “The Great Reset” and he immediately rushed out a book, Covid-19: The Great Reset, to celebrate his good fortune. (12)
Strangely enough, Schwab and co-author Thierry Malleret admit that Covid-19 is “one of the least deadly pandemics the world has experienced over the last 2000 years”, adding that “the consequences of COVID-19 in terms of health and mortality will be mild compared to previous pandemics”. (13)
They add: “It does not constitute an existential threat, or a shock that will leave its imprint on the world’s population for decades”. (14)
Yet, incredibly, this “mild” illness is simultaneously presented as the excuse for unprecedented social change under the banner of “The Great Reset”!
“It is our defining moment”, they crow. “Many things will change forever”. “A new world will emerge”. (15) “The societal upheaval unleashed by COVID-19 will last for years, and possibly generations”. (16) “Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal. The short response is: never”. (17)
For Schwab, Covid-19 means full steam ahead for everything he has been wanting to foist upon us for years under the label of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
He and Malleret report with satisfaction that “the pandemic will fast-forward the adoption of automation in the workplace and the introduction of more robots in our personal and professional lives”. (18)
They are delighted with the “accelerating growth of e-commerce”, (19) with the “ever-more powerful expansion of e-sports”, (20) with the boom in online banking transactions (21) and with the fact that, thanks to Covid, “the world of education, like for so many other industries, will become partly virtual”. (22)
They declare chirpily: “Our lingering and possibly lasting fear of being infected with a virus (COVID-19 or another) will thus speed the relentless march of automation, particularly in the fields most susceptible to automation”. (23)
But why is all this so important for Schwab? What is it that makes him and his WEF pals so eager to push through the Great Reset, the New Normal and the Fourth Industrial Revolution on the back of Covid?
It is all about money and power, which are essentially the same thing in the degraded modern society in which we live.
On the most basic level, a certain type of business stands to make a lot of money from lockdown culture.
As Schwab and Malleret are pleased to note: “The combined market value of the leading tech companies hit record after record during the lockdowns… this phenomenon is unlikely to abate any time soon, quite the opposite”. (24)
There is also the massive global shift of wealth from public purse to private hands that has been justified by Covid. Another bail-out for the 0.1%.
Schwab and Malleret gloat: “In April 2020, just as the pandemic began to engulf the world, governments across the globe had announced stimulus programmes amounting to several trillion dollars, as if eight or nine Marshall Plans had been put into place almost simultaneously”. (25)
But there is something even more insidious behind all this.
The Great Reset is, ultimately, about resetting the capitalist economy by allowing it to expand into new realms, to privatise and exploit new “products” that it could not previously reach.
Those “products” are us, our lives and our world – human and natural “capital”.
Schwab hints at this agenda in his books when he writes about “new ways of creating value” (26) and looks forward to “an explosion in tradable assets, as all kinds of value exchange can be hosted on the blockchain”. (27)
What he is referring to is “impact investment“, a scam through which hedge fund speculators aim to make phenomenal amounts of money by gambling on people’s lives.
In order to be able to package us all up into “products” that can be processed by the algorithms and data bases of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, everything we do has to be digital.
Our identities and lives have to be constructed online so they can be used as the basis for the new capitalism.
The worst thing about impact capitalism is that it hides behind the pretence of doing good. It clings to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and uses all the correct language to make itself acceptable for people who see themselves as progressive.
So we have the nauseating spectacle of Sir Ronald Cohen, notorious capitalist shark and Tony Blair’s banker, claiming piously that impact capitalism “will lead us to a new and better world” (28) by “helping those in need and preserving our planet”. (29)
This, alongside all the virtue-signalling moral self-righteousness surrounding Covid, makes it hard for people to see the vile reality behind what is being planned.
Those promoting the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Great Reset employ armies of “journalists” and “fact-checkers” to hide the truth and dismiss researchers and dissidents as “conspiracy theorists”.
We all know how difficult it is to persuade even friends and family to look beyond the mass media propaganda and find out what is really happening.
But this is what we have to do, in every way we can.
The stakes are too great here, to simply turn away and hope it will all turn out all right in the end.
Schwab, Cohen and the like are herding us into a digital prison camp and if we don’t soon snap out of our collective complacency and make a bolt for freedom, future generations don’t stand a chance in hell of living decent and dignfied human lives.
Get informed! Explore our Great Reset online library
1. Klaus Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Geneva: WEF, 2016), e-book. 3% [e-book equivalent of page number]
2. Ibid. 3%
3. Ibid. 3%
4. Klaus Schwab with Nicholas Davis, Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Guide to Building a Better World (Geneva: WEF, 2018), e-book. 20%
5. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. 12%
6. Ibid. 79%
7. Schwab, Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 9%
8. Ibid. 9%
9. Ibid. 17%
10. Ibid. 17%
12. Klaus Schwab, Thierry Malleret, Covid-19: The Great Reset (Geneva: WEF, 2020), e-book.
13. Ibid. 89%
14. Ibid. 89%
15. Ibid. 2%
16. Ibid. 26%
17. Ibid. 2%
18. Ibid. 57%
19. Ibid. 64%
20. Ibid. 74%
21. Ibid. 64%
22. Ibid. 73%
23. Ibid. 55%
24. Ibid. 73%
25. Ibid. 32%
26. Schwab, Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 1%
27. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. 85%
28. Ronald Cohen, Impact: Reshaping Capitalism to Drive Real Change (London: Ebury Press, 2020). E-book. 2%
29. Ibid. 78%
winter oak | March 29, 2021 at 4:55 pm | Tags: Fourth Industrial Revolution, Great Reset, impact capitalism, Klaus Schwab | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: https://wp.me/p5HzSy-1Hn
See all comments
Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from winter oak.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
- Did You Know?
- Opinion Pages
- The Expose Blog
- World News
- Keep up with the Expose
- Advertise with us
- Contact us
- We Need Your Support
We appreciate your support
Every month by paying your TV license you donate £13.33 to the BBC who broadcast government propaganda and lies. Why not support ‘The Daily Expose’ in their mission to report the facts that the mainstream refuse to instead?
Powered by Translate
Search for… Breaking News
| How changing police roles, monitoring technology & politicised media increase the certainty of a British dictatorship by John Ward Tonight’s piece first appeared at The Slog on August 29th 2018. Under three years on, I republish it here for four reasons. Firstly, to advertise. I was and remain an adman from silver locks to twinkly-toes, because I know it to be a strong support for entrepreneurial regional capitalism in its existential species fight against the forces of protectionist monopolism. Culturally attuned advertising stresses genuine product/service superiority, and lights a fire under globalist fat cats. I am advertising the fact that I have painfully collected skills across economic, financial, psychographic, political, fiscal and anthropological areas over half a century. I know the people variously ignorant about and exploititive of such things: so all up, I know more about what’s coming down the road than most. Hence the tagline I often use here, ‘The Future’s in The Slog’. (If that seems too much of a hostage to fortune, I should add that I also use ‘Iabato! It’s all bollocks, and that’s Official’.) Always have an escape lane. Second, because those trying to rewrite the past before they scifi the future into a dystopian horror epic for our kids and grandchildren have the upper hand at the moment: they have the power to turn that power into eternal, irreversible power to destroy the human will psychologically, genetically and technologically. The one thing helping them to get there is Us. The one thing that can stop them is Us. So no pressure or anything, but thousands of people like me are here to say, “It’s your call Homo sapiens….either you deserve the term, or you’re just Homo erectus gone out to lunch”. Third, from unforgivable idleness. And fourth, to show you just how remarkably little I have aged over the last three years. Yes ladies, at 73 I am still the irresistible superhero Captain Slapdash you always imagined me to be. Meanwhile back on Earth, although the ongoing decline in my competence continues, apart from the odd typo that’s been corrected, nothing has been altered from the original to change either substance, prediction or meaning…. Crimes solved by bots, naysayers framed by technology, police watching our pcs and deserting our streets, gullible citizens accepting flimsy narratives, and a corporate media consensus suppressing dissent. If this is what you want, then congratulations: the project is well under way…..and gathering speed. When the British police élite asserted recently that, in future, they would only be recruiting from the graduate pool, I (along with many others) thought it was a hoot given the stage and satire stereotype of bobbies with big feet saying “Nar then, nar then, whassa goin’ on ‘ere, you’re nicked chummy”. But I quickly revised my view in the light of a long conversation with two recently retired senior cops. The government class’s public rationale for Bright Bobbies is that they’re not going to be bobbies as such, but experts in techno, cyber and complex fraud, given that most crime is either virtual, treasonous or professional. Setting aside the fact that this isn’t true (there’s a big difference between recorded crime and reality) on the basis of this apparent attempt to stop ‘invisible’ crime, the Home Office approved decision has barely caused a ripple. But both circumstantial and official evidence is beginning to emerge that the entire role of “civil” policing is about to be not so much changed as abandoned. The big winners in that change are going to be online social media, retail distributors, surveillance cameras and the brokers who variously collect, analyse and then market the data to those who want – equally variously – to sell, snoop, change and monitor. This is an excerpt from a rivetting US piece, written by a Private Eye skilled in modern detection: ‘I had a classic case that shows just how traceable we all now are. There was a dead body, a possible murder victim, but no direct evidence: no witnesses, no DNA, no fingerprints, and no murder weapon found. In San Francisco’s East Bay, however, as in most big American cities, there are so many surveillance cameras mounted on mom-and-pop stores, people’s houses, bars, cafes, hospitals, toll bridges, tunnels, even in parks, that the police can collect enough video, block by block, to effectively map a suspect driving around Oakland for hours before hitting the freeway and heading out to dump a body, just as the defendant in my case did……The particular suspect I have in mind drove his victim’s car across a bridge, where cameras videotaped the license plate but couldn’t see inside the car; nor, he must have assumed, could anyone record him on the deserted road he finally reached where he was undoubtedly confident that he was safe. What he didn’t notice was the CALFIRE video camera placed on that very road to monitor for brush fires. It caught a car’s headlights matching his on its way to the site he had chosen to dump the body.’ To the blindly gullible, this looks like total good news: every murderer will now be caught – hurrah! But there are three very malign elements in all this: 1. Who needs cops on the beat when tech can do all this? 2. What if you’re not a murderer, but the enemy of a controlling corporate State that uses hitech and graduated analysis to make usurpation of its totalitarian dictatorship virtually impossible? 3. Hitech also makes mistakes, but juries believe in it 100% – despite all the mass of evidence that it is nowhere near infallible. Our informant the Private Eye again: ‘In our world of the unforgotten, tech is seen as a wonder of wonders. Juries love tech. Many jurors think tech is simply science and so beyond disbelief. As a result, they tend to react badly when experts are called as defense witnesses to disabuse them of their belief in tech’s magic powers: that, for instance, cellphone calls don’t always pinpoint exactly where someone was when he or she made a call. If too many signals are coming in to the closest tower to a cell phone, a suspect’s calls may be rerouted to a more distant tower. Similarly, the FBI’s computerized fingerprint index often makes mistakes in its matches, as do police labs when it comes to DNA samples.’ This is worrying, but not the only reason to fear miscarriages of justice: there is another side to hitech, and that is its potential for the falsification of visual evidence in a deliberate attempt to frame someone. Digital film special effects can be inflicted upon a video record, and then copied back onto surveillance camera video before being “discovered” by investigators. If there are no physical, civil policemen in cars or walking the beat, if wonky machines can find us guilty, if the rule of Law can be perverted so easily by political and corporate interests, then the cold, merciless and increasingly hidden face of the State will leave citizens not just worried about who elected officials work for: it will leave all of us except those in the tiny oligarchy defenceless against sociopathy in public life. Look at how easily large portions of the British public have accepted minimal evidence of Russian involvement in the Skripal case as guilt established beyond a shadow of a doubt. At the moment, only a few higher-quality online commentators have a handle on the huge holes in Boris Johnson’s “case” against Russian agents (all unnamed), Vladimir Putin (a man with no credible motive) and Basshar Assad (a man with no need to drop chemical weapons on his own people). But a giant leap from the symptoms of two spies of dubious loyalty in Salisbury led to the bombing of Syrian ammo dumps and airfields – note absence of chemwarfare factories to hit – by three NATO countries without asking any constitutional authorities in the three aggressor States for permission so to do…least of all The People. Now the new UK Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt not only has penultimate responsibility for getting a “deal” from the EU on Brexit, his feet are pounding heavily upon the track of anti-Russian sanctions pummeled by Johnson: Hunt is doing the rounds of EU capitals, calling for deeper economic penalties against “Russian plots” to wipe out double-agents. The journalist with the best credentials to examine this case continues to point up how a dangerously small media club has been disgracefully complicit in the accusations. This week, Craig Murray turned his attention towards the BBC, which has recently deflected an FoI request about its “coverage” of the Skripal Case. Rightly pointing out that the Beeb’s refusal to comply with the request is utterly fraudulent, Murray has sent an email to the journalist most directly involved, Mark Urban, as follows: Dear Mark, As you may know, I am a journalist working in alternative media, a member of the NUJ, as well as a former British Ambassador. I am researching the Skripal case. I wish to ask you the following questions. 1) When the Skripals were first poisoned, it was the largest news story in the entire World and you were uniquely positioned having held several meetings with Sergei Skripal the previous year. Yet faced with what should have been a massive career break, you withheld that unique information on a major story from the public for four months. Why?|
2) You were an officer in the Royal Tank Regiment together with Skripal’s MI6 handler, Pablo Miller, who also lived in Salisbury. Have you maintained friendship with Miller over the years and how often do you communicate?
3) When you met Skripal in Salisbury, was Miller present all or part of the time, or did you meet Miller separately?
4) Was the BBC aware of your meetings with Miller and/or Skripal at the time?
5) When, four months later, you told the world about your meetings with Skripal after the Rowley/Sturgess incident, you said you had met him to research a book. Yet the only forthcoming book by you advertised is on the Skripal attack. What was the subject of your discussions with Skripal?
6) Pablo Miller worked for Orbis Intelligence. Do you know if Miller contributed to the Christopher Steele dossier on Trump/Russia?
7) Did you discuss the Trump dossier with Skripal and/or Miller?
8) Do you know whether Skripal contributed to the Trump dossier?
9) In your Newsnight piece following the Rowley/Sturgess incident, you stated that security service sources had told you that Yulia Skripal’s telephone may have been bugged. Since January 2017, how many security service briefings or discussions have you had on any of the matters above? I look forward to hearing from you.’ Far be it from me to insert words into what’s written between the lines of this email, but it is very hard to read it and not conclude that Mr Murray is suggesting a link between MI6 and Urban, accusing Urban of censoring vital Skripal information, and questioning his objectivity as a BBC journalist. Underlying the message is a suspicion that, given his military track-record and intelligence connections, Mark Urban has perhaps forgotten who pays his salary. Either way, ever since David Cameron’s quiet pro-HSBC coup against what the BBC used to stand for, bullying by both him, Blair, Campbell, Mandelson et al over the last fifteen years has brought the Beeb perilously close to being nothing more than a mouthpiece for the neocon foreign policy élite, and in turn (at a lower level) an uncritical promoter of the pc belief system affected by the British Establishment. We arrive at the familiar prerequisites for citizen enslavement: an unrepresentative clique in power, an equally unrepresentative faction in opposition, the strengthening of the grip a technocentric surveillance State has upon well-meaning contrarians, a mass of under 30s largely schooled in acceptance education, and a tiny cabal running a media consensus that favours a stagnant status quo in which little is allowed to change. The only metamorphosis on the cards today is the transformation of an apolitical civil police force into a politicised State police entity that is shaping up to become a sort of Gestapo on steroids. Laugh if you want. Throw scorn upon the very idea. But by so doing, you are an active catalyst for the realisation of an amoral, uncompassionate and violently repressive world. Author’s footnote from March 2021 on the key players identified here: the British Police now follow up LGBTQ complaints about statements that do not break any law. They display open support for Antifa and BLM ‘show the knee’ fascism. They oppressively break up protests about free speech and assembly. They harrass innocent citizens about obedience to untested virology science. Mendacious UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson went on to become Prime Minister, spookily soon after which deadly global plague SarsCovid2Contrick19TeenageMutant appeared in our lives. Not long afterwards, Donald Trump the one leader who suggested (and proved by his own chosen behaviour) that Covid19 has nothing new to kill any additional numbers of us beyond seasonal culling was removed by an election whose irregularities remain univestigated. If you want to sign up to this blog – and thus foil the pinched goblins of social media and rice-paper platforms – you can do so by writing at me on firstname.lastname@example.org. You’ll get (at most) a daily email that sells you nothing and keeps you informed. John Ward | March 28, 2021 at 7:34 pm | Tags: The future’s in The Slog | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: https://wp.me/p18jPR-AmG Comment See all comments
TERRIFYING! – 8th update on Adverse Reactions to Covid Vaccines released by UK Government Posted by F.S West Country Correspondent Marh 29th 2021
The UK Government have released their eighth report highlighting adverse reactions to both the Pfizer / BioNTech and Oxford / AstraZeneca vaccines that have occurred since the roll-out began on the 8th December 2020 and this time we dug deeper and what we have found it terrifying…
The U.K. Governments report (which you can find here) has collated data inputted up to the 14th March via the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme. At this point an estimated 10.9 million first doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and 13.7 million doses of the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine, had been administered, and around 1.3 million second doses, mostly the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine, had been administered. This accounts for an increase of 2.3 million doses administered on the previous week.
Our earliest analysis of the data which we brought you back at the beginning of February showed that there had been 49,472 adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine, and 21,032 adverse reactions to the Oxford vaccine up to the 24th January 2021, with a rate of 1 in every 333 people receiving the jab suffering a serious adverse reaction.
Well we can confirm that in the space of seven weeks the number of reported adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine has increased by 119.6%, now standing at a total of 108,649 adverse reactions as of the 14th March. The Oxford jab has fared much worse though with an astounding increase of 1301.77% in the number of reported adverse reactions between the 24th January and the 14th March, now standing at a total of 294,820. This now means the current rate of people suffering a serious adverse reaction after having one of the experimental Covid vaccines stands at 1 in every 166 people.
The terrifying thing about this is around only 1% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme, with many people not even knowing of its existence.
We took a dive into the reports to see what types of adverse reaction were being reported, and this is what we found…
The first adverse reaction that caught our attention is an ailment known as thromocytopenia. If you have thrombocytopenia, you don’t have enough platelets in your blood. Platelets help your blood clot, which stops bleeding. If you have a severe form, you can bleed spontaneously in your eyes, gums, or bladder or bleed too much when you’re injured.
Now this ailment has some relation as to why several European countries including France, Italy, Norway and Denmark suspended the use of the Oxford / AstraZeneca vaccine. Health officials in these countries were concerned about the hospitalisation and in some cases deaths of people with serious blood clots and low levels of blood platelets.
The chief investigator tasked with investigating this in Norway confirmed recently that the AstraZeneca jab was in fact to blame.
So it’s concerning to see that in the UK there have been 20 reported cases of thrombocytopenia occurring due to the Oxford / AstraZeneca vaccine, resulting in 1 death as of the 14th March. As well as 28 cases of immune thrombocytopenia, also resulting in 1 death. Immune thrombocytopenia is where the immune system attacked and destroys platelets, which are cell fragments that help blood clot.
But it’s also concerning to find the same event occurring due to the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA jab, with 15 reported cases of thrombocytopenia occurring up to the 14th March, resulting in 1 death, and 13 reported cases of immune thromocytopenia. All eyes are on AstraZeneca when they should also be watching Pfizer.
The next adverse reaction we found was labelled as Myocardial infarction within the reports, but it is what is commonly known as a ‘heart attack’. It occurs when blood flow decreases or stops to a part of the heart, causing damage to the heart muscle.
We can confirm that 34 cases myocardial infarction have been reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme as of the 14th March due to the Pfizer vaccine, with 9 of these cases sadly resulting in death.
However the Oxford jab fares worse as there have been 48 cases of ‘heart attack’ reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme with 14 of these sadly resulting in death.
But the adverse reactions associated with the heart don’t end there as there have been a total of 44 cases of cardiac arrest reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme as a result of having the Pfizer vaccine, with 18 of these resulting in death as of the 14th March.
With the Oxford jab causing 41 cases of cardiac arrest and 13 of these resulting death. Cardiac arrest is a sudden loss of blood flow resulting from the failure of the heart to pump effectively.
The next reaction to catch our attention was tachycardia, which can be extremely dangerous. Tachycardia is a medical term for a heart rate over 100 beats per minute and increases the risk of stroke, heart failure, cardiac arrest and death.
So the 345 cases of tachycardia reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme after having the Pfizer vaccine may explain why we’re seeing so many cases of heart attack and cardiac arrest.
As will the 622 cases of tachycardia reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme after having the AstraZeneca vaccine. Almost double that of the Pfizer vaccine.
The reported cases of tachycardia may also explain why we’re seeing the next adverse reaction to the Covid vaccines. You’ve probably noticed the increase in ‘How to spot the signs of a stroke’ adverts in recent weeks courtesy of the NHS, well could this have anything to do with the increase in reported central nervous system haemorrhages and cerebrovascular accidents a.k.a strokes to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme as a result of the experimental Covid vaccines?
As of the 14th March, the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme has seen 10 reports of cerebral haemorrhage resulting in 3 deaths, 7 reports of cerebral infarction, 12 reports of ischaemic stroke resulting in 1 death and 4 reports of subarachnoid haemorrhage resulting in 1 death, all as a result of the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine.
But the most reported type of stroke occurring after having the Pfizer jab is a cerebrovascular accident, which is the sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen when the blood flow to the brain is impaired by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain. With 71 cases of cerebrovascular accident resulting in 3 deaths being reported as a result of having the Pfizer vaccine.
A cerebrovascular accident is also the most common type of stroke to occur after having the Oxford vaccine, with 85 cases resulting in 7 deaths being reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme as of the 14th March 2021. But we have also seen 10 cases of cerebral haemorrhage resulting in 3 deaths, 4 cases of cerebral infarction resulting in 1 death, 4 cases of haemorrhagic stroke resulting in 1 death and 12 cases of ischaemic stroke among many others.
Bell’s palsy is a condition that causes temporary weakness or paralysis (lack of movement) of the muscles in one side of the face. It is the most common cause of facial paralysis. We can confirm that as of the 14th March there have been a total of 117 cases of facial paralysis reported to the MHRA as a result of having the Oxford / AstraZeneca vaccine.
Before we present the number of Bell’s palsy / Facial paralysis cases reported to the MHRA as a result of having the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine we want to show you what the MHRA had to say on the subject in their analysis of the report –
‘The MHRA continues to review cases reporting Bell’s Palsy and to analyse case reports against the number expected to occur by chance in the absence of vaccination (the ‘natural rate’). The number of reports of facial paralysis received so far is similar to the expected natural rate and does not currently suggest an increased risk following the vaccines. We will continue to monitor these events, including through evaluation of electronic healthcare record data.’
Interesting. So can the MHRA please explain why the number of reported cases of Bell’s palsy / Facial paralysis as a result of having the Pfizer vaccine is almost double the number reported as a result of having the Oxford vaccine when there have been 2 – 3 million more doses of the Oxford jab administered as of the 14th March 2021?
The total number reported cases of facial paralysis reported to the MHRA as a result of having the Pfizer / BioNTech experimental mRNA vaccine now stands at 220. This proves causation as we should be seeing less than what has been reported as a result of having the Oxford jab if the rate was in line with what can be expected in the “unvaccinated” population.
The next concerning adverse reaction reported to the MHRA is people suffering seizures. A seizure is a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain. It can cause changes in your behavior, movements or feelings, and in levels of consciousness.
There have been 131 reported cases of seizure after having the Pfizer jab resulting in 1 death.
However the Oxford jab fares much worse with almost triple the amount of reported seizures occurring after administration, standing at a total of 351 and resulting in 2 deaths.
But there is a much more concerning adverse reaction which found relating to seizures. You’ll have noticed in the table above that we highlighted an adverse reaction known as a ‘febrile convulsion’, with 1 reported case occurring due to the Pfizer jab. Now 1 reported case doesn’t sound so concerning, but the actual condition occurring is. Because a febrile seizure is a fit that can happen when a child has a fever, most often happening between the ages of 6 months and 3 years. But they usually stop after the age of 6, with it being extremely rare to occur in adults.
Now we know that children are not being vaccinated, nor should they be due to the extremely low risk of them suffering serious disease if contacting the alleged Covid-19. So it’s extremely concerning to find that there have been a total of 36 reported cases of febrile convulsion occurring after having the Oxford / AstraZeneca vaccine. Which also proves causation due to the rarity of it occurring in adults and the 360% difference in the number of occurrences compared to the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine.
In all there have been a total of 20,632 nervous system disorders resulting in 18 deaths reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme as of the 14th March 2021 due to having the Pfizer jab.
But there have been over three times as many nervous system disorders reported as a result of having the AstraZeneca jab. With the total standing at 63,660 which has resulted in 23 deaths, as of the 14th March 2021.
Finally we come to deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines.
The MHRA has received 259 reports of death to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in which the patient died shortly after vaccination, 326 reports for the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine and 9 where the brand of vaccine was unspecified.
The MHRA tries to justify these deaths as not being caused by the vaccine by stating that ‘the majority of these reports were in elderly people or people with underlying illness‘.
We’re sure they have, but how dare they try to apply this logic to deaths reported as adverse reactions to experimental vaccines when the authorities have abandoned the same logic in order to strike fear into the hearts and minds of the general public to ensure they complied with dictatorial tyranny for the past 12 months and counting.
When someone dies with underlying conditions within 28 days of receiving a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 we are told it is definitely Covid-19. But when someone dies with underlying conditions within just a few days of receiving a dose of an experimental Covid vaccine we are told it is definitely the underlying conditions.
The hypocrisy stinks!
We urgently need your help! Did you enjoy this article and reading the facts that the mainstream refuse to tell you? Then please support us in our March Fundraising Campaign to help us compete with the mainstream media and enable us to bring you even more of the facts that the mainstream refuse to…
EXPLOSIVE: EU HAD VAX PASSPORT ROADMAP TWO YEARS before COVID ‘BORN’ Posted March 21st 2021
by John Ward
|EXPLOSIVE: EU HAD VAX PASSPORT ROADMAP TWO YEARS before COVID ‘BORN’ by John Ward SUMMIT IN SEPT 2019 HAD SOCIAL MEDIA PITCHING TO QUASH NAYSAYERS, & SPELT OUT WHO’s AGITPROP AGENDA Gates, Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, secret State and WHO implicated in global web of deceit & corruption Where to start on this one? What follows is an evidential trail of geopolitical psychopathy revealing that not just Bill Gates and Davos were trailers for hyper-hyped Covid19: also inside the tent (it appears) were the WHO, Jeffrey Epstein, US biowarfare intelligence, Beijing – and the European Union. Coincidence? Judge for yourselves. The European Commission website speaking in Autumn 2019: ‘Vaccination prevents an estimated 2.5 million deaths worldwide each year and reduces disease-specific treatment costs. Despite its brilliant track record, several EU and neighbouring countries are currently facing unprecedented outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases due to insufficient vaccination coverage rates. Unequal access to vaccines and in some places warning of public confidence in vaccination are a cause for concern and a major challenge for public health experts. The WHO declared vaccine misinformation as one of the main health threats for 2019.’ You may recall that earlier this year, The Slog revealed how Germany ordered its test and trace kits from South Korea before Christmas 2019….when barely a soul on the planet had even heard of SarsCov2 aka Covid19. The information was largely poo-poohed by the media….who do not, of course, have any alterntive explanation as to why our friends in Berlin got on top of the virus before anyone else. My point was that the German Secret Service got wind of ‘something in the air’ before C19 was rapidly turned into “a deadly global pandemic” some six weeks later. But this week, further evidence pointing to WHO/EU links has emerged. In September 2019 (the roadmap at the head of this post can easily be examined here ) the EU updated the roadmap which was first published in Q3 2018. In that same month a year later, a major Summit was called in association with the WHO. Over a similar time period, Bill Gates (with many years behind him of massive investment in Biotech Pharma companies and huge donations to academic vaccination research) was also busy in New York and at Davos whipping up support for global vaccination campaigns. During those years, he had several meetings with Jeffrey Epstein, the paedophile pimp; later, Gates denied this, but it is true: Even the New York Slimes admits that ‘beginning in 2011, Mr. Gates met with Mr. Epstein on numerous occasions — including at least three times at Mr. Epstein’s palatial Manhattan townhouse, and at least once staying late into the night, according to interviews with more than a dozen people familiar with the relationship, as well as documents reviewed by The New York Times. Employees of Mr. Gates’s foundation also paid multiple visits to Mr. Epstein’s mansion.’ The two men planned a massive global foundation in concert with JP Morgan Chase – run by that nice man, Jamie Dimon. At the time, Gates had but two interests – healthtech in general, and vaccination biotech + track and trace via his equally astonishing investment in low altitude satellites after 2008. The point of introducing this dimension into the mix is that it is now widely accepted that, at least part-time, Epstein was heavily involved in CIA entrapment/psy-op counter espionage for the US Government. When Epstein became a little too gobby and fond of making threats about the location of bodies, he was duly run in, and conveniently hanged himself while allegedly under 24/7 guard…but the guards were conveniently doing other stuff at the time. Now our Jeffrey’s most trusted “madame” and procurer Ghislaine Maxwell is also under lock and key in a New York jail. Two days ago, however, this report appeared, and his since been confirmed by the judge concerned: So then, impure thoughts about global culls are forbidden. But isn’t that just about the worst example of Top Down State talking to its infant citizens you ever saw? I mean, c’mon – ‘too sensational and impure to be disclosed to the public’. Dear oh dear oh dear – The Bidenist Secret State in action: you were all brought up in a nunnery, so that’s enough of that. A wonderful reminder of the Judge during the 1963 obscenity trial of Lady Chatterley’s Lover: “I would ask the jury whether they would want their servants to read this book”. The bottom line is this: Epstein was heavily involved with US security services, and Bill Gates Vaxxer-Surveillance man was happy to get into bed with both him and Dimon on joint operations by the Unelected State. So what happened at the Big EU Vaccine Jamboree a few months before Covid19 so conveniently appeared to give everyone a terrific return on investment? Well for starters, a Slog source within Brussels this morning confirmed to me that Facebook made a pitch to “offer its services” in promoting the benefits of vaccination…..but as we know with Zuckerberg, this really meant shutting up every critic who gets in the way. And luckily for Marky-Mark, the profoundly corrupt Jean-Claude Juncker was all in favour of censorship to the maxx on the subject of vaxx (my emphases): “While some people are suffering due to lack of access to vaccines, many people are risking their lives – and the lives of others – by refusing vaccines based on myths and unfounded rumours about safety and effectiveness. This scepticism had its origins in disinformation campaigns designed to undermine vaccination, but the Commission is working with internet platforms to tackle this problem. ” This was a solution in search of a problem. Within four months, the problem arrived with suspiciously impeccable timing. In an opening address, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the WHO, spat some more petrol onto Juncker’s fire: “When we talk about the right to health, we talk about the right to vaccines…..The WHO has been working with Pinterest and Facebook to ensure social media users are directed to accurate and reliable information.” Well of course they were…for everyone else but the WHO was wrong, right? Dr Tedros is Ethiopian. While Health Minister of that country, he was accused of covering up cholera outbreaks. Human rights activist Kassahun Adefris said he was worried about Tedros becoming head of the WHO. Human Rights Watch also criticized Tedros during his campaign for WHO Director-General, because he was part of what they said was an authoritarian regime in Ethiopia that persecuted members of the opposition and journalists. Which, indeed they did. Tedros got himself elected chief at the WHO because he “aggresively lobbied 54 African State officials at the UN”. We all know what “lobbying” in Africa really means. More intriguing links emerge: Tedros was also elected to head WHO with Chinese behind-the-scenes support, reflecting Beijing’s close relationship with Addis Ababa, which has for years acted as China’s key bridgehead in Africa. Covid19 first became life (depending on how you define life) in the town of Wuhan….which, research shows, is in China – and a key centre of biowarfare development. On January 11th 2020, Tesdros heaped praise on the director of China’s National Health Commission, Ma Xiaowei for “sharing information on the genetic sequencing of the coronavirus in a timely manner,” when in fact Beijing had delayed passing on this lifesaving information for 10 days after Chinese doctors finished their research. Whichever way you lean on this issue, it’s time to stop sucking your security blanket, and accept that Covid19 is some kind of geopolitical operation in which bigging up the role of vaccination in medicine played a crucial role. The evidence mounts to suggest that advisers to government are on one or more payrolls, that the key players are serially anti-democratic, and that the political class is nothing more than a rag-bag of monied ignorami working for the 0.1%. John Ward | March 20, 2021 at 2:07 pm | Tags: Bill Gates, EU/WHO alliance revealed, Facebook, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, More Covi19 sleaze | Categories: EU>>WHO>>Gates>>Covid smoking gun | URL: https://wp.me/p18jPR-AkJ Comment See all|
May 10, 2018,12:15pm EDT
China Is Launching Weather-Control Machines Across An Area The Size Of Alaska Posted March 19th 2021
A Chinese worker fires rockets for cloud seeding in an attempt to make rain in Huangpi, central… [+]
China is launching the world’s largest weather-control machine, with the ability to modify the weather in an area similar to the size of Alaska. China has never shied away from doing things on a massive scale and this is yet another example of the Chinese government working on an unprecedented scale.
China’s state-owned Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation is implementing a plan to send thousands of rain-inducing machines across the Tibetan Plateau to increase rainfall along the region.
The Tibetan Plateau is the source of much of China’s water, running down from the mountainous highlands via the massive Yangtze, Mekong, and Yellow rivers. These rivers, which originate on the Tibetan Plateau, are fed by glacial and snow meltwater and drain down into the fertile Chinese farmlands.
Tthe mountains and grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau are seen from the air in the Yushu Tibetan… [+]
The practice of artificially inducing rainfall in China is not new, the country manipulated the weather over Beijing just before and during the 2008 Beijing Olympics to ensure a rain-free event. The practice has only grown in scale as part of the Sky River Project aimed at increasing China’s water resources for its billions of people.
China is installing tens of thousands of chambers across the Tibetan Plateau and mountains. These machines will produce very fine silver iodide particles that are then lifted into the atmosphere with upwelling winds. As these particles are dispersed into the atmosphere they act as the nucleating point of condensed water.
Yaks walk on the grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau in the Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of… [+]
In order for water vapor (humidity) in the air to form clouds and eventually rain, it requires a nucleating particle. Typically, this is a tiny particle of dust which en masse produces the clouds we see in the sky. By artificially “seeding” the Tibetan Plateau with silver iodide particles the Chinese government is inducing the formation of clouds where there weren’t any before. Once the clouds become unstable, this leads to artificially induced rainfall.
Each rain machine (chamber) is expected to create a 3-mile long strip of billowing clouds. When multiplied by the thousands of chambers China is installing along the Tibetan Plateau, it is estimated that China will be artificially controlling the weather over an area similar to the size of Alaska.
A rocket launcher used to seed clouds to induce rain is seen at a station of the Beijing… [+]
China plans to monitor the system through weather satellites and supplement with silver iodide particles deployed from planes and shot out of ground artillery. In total, the Chinese government expects the system, which will span 620,000 square miles, to produce up to 10 billion cubic meters of rainfall each year.
I am a geologist passionate about sharing Earth’s intricacies with you. I received my PhD from Duke University where I studied the geology and climate of the Amazon.
US military hinted at using HAARP weather machine in WW3 in 12-year-old report Posted March 19th 2021
EXCLUSIVE: Conspiracy theorists have long speculated that the defunct project is secretly being used in warfare, but a 12-year-old report suggests the US military has considered itdailystar
The Daily Star’s FREE newsletter is spectacular! Sign up today for the best stories straight to your inboxWhen you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters. Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer. OurPrivacy Noticeexplains more about how we use your data, and your rights. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Conspiracy theorists have long speculated that the defunct HAARP project is secretly being used in warfare, but a 12-year-old document and a speech from the 1990s suggest the US military have at least considered the idea.
The High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is a cutting edge transmitter facility used to study the properties and behaviour of the ionosphere, located in Alaska.
Its military-funded construction was completed in 2007, but just seven years later the programme was shut down and ownership of HAARP and its capabilities were transferred to the University of Alaska.
For years conspiracy theorists have speculated that the US government is using HAARP to control the weather, an allegation that’s been repeatedly denied by officials and scientists.
The recent flare-up in tensions between the US and Iran reignited interest in the theory, with some speculating that should full-scale war break out HAARP would be used by American troops to defeat Iran.
A spate of earthquakes near Iran’s Bushehr nuclear power plant only fuelled the theories.
In 2017 the Iranian Deputy Interior Minister for Security and Law Enforcement, Mohammad Hossein Zolfaqari, was forced to issue a public statement denying a connection between the region’s repeated earthquakes and HAARP.
American magazine National Review reports that in a speech in 1997, the US Secretary of Defence William Cohen made an oblique reference to military technology that could cause earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.
“…some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops,” he said.
“Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.”
National Review speculates he may have been referring to a HAARP prototype, but casts doubt on whether members of the Trump administration could quiet about possessing earthquake weapons.
A 12-year-old document also contains evidence that the US military planned to invest in “weather modification” technology in the interest of national security.
Air Force 2025, a 3,300-page report featuring contributions from technologists, futurists, science fiction writers, scientists, historians, active military officers and retired Air Force generals, was published in 2008.
It predicts the most pressing dangers facing the US in the decades to come, and devises potential defence strategies to combat them.
One such proposal was the creation of a “Spacebased High-Energy Laser System” – a hugely powerful chemical laser with the ability to hit targets on the ground, in the air and in space.
“At lower power settings, it could disable enemy optics, perform passive sensing missions, actively illuminate a target with a laser, or even modify the weather,” an article analysing the report reads. “Between fifteen and twenty such satellites could provide global coverage.”
In an excerpt from the report itself published by Global Research, experts seem convinced that militarised weather manipulation is not a far-fetched fantasy but only a matter of time.
“Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally,” it reads.
“It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog, and storms on earth or to modify space weather, … and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of technologies which can provide substantial increase in US, or degraded capability in an adversary, to achieve global awareness, reach, and power.”
It’s unlikely that Iran’s earthquakes were caused by HAARP or that the programme will be used in future attacks, but there’s ample evidence its potential capabilities once formed a key part of the US defence strategy.Related ArticlesScientists want to send 6.7 million sperm samples to Moon in Doomsday planNASA’s Hubble telescope ‘on its last legs’ as faulty gear found in IT glitchLife began with a lightning bolt that zapped Earth, b
NEWS EXPLAINER 26 February 2021
Covid Questions March 10th 2021
GENEVA (AP) — When the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus a pandemic one year ago Thursday, it did so only after weeks of resisting the term and maintaining that the highly infectious virus could still be stopped.
A year later, the U.N. agency is still struggling to keep on top of the evolving science of COVID-19, to persuade countries to abandon their nationalistic tendencies and help get vaccines where they’re needed most.
The agency made some costly missteps along the way: It advised people against wearing masks for months and asserted that COVID-19 wasn’t widely spread in the air. It also declined to publicly call out countries — particularly China — for mistakes that senior WHO officials grumbled about privately. ADVERTISEMENT
That created some tricky politics that challenged WHO’s credibility and wedged it between two world powers, setting off vociferous Trump administration criticism that the agency is only now emerging from. MORE ON THE PANDEMIC
- – Will the coronavirus ever go away?
- – As pandemic enters 2nd year, voices of resilience emerge
- – Brazil hospitals buckle in absence of national virus plan
President Joe Biden’s support for WHO may provide some much-needed breathing space, but the organization still faces a monumental task ahead as it tries to project some moral authority amid a universal scramble for vaccines that is leaving billions of people unprotected.
“WHO has been a bit behind, being cautious rather than precautionary,” said Gian Luca Burci, a former WHO legal counsel now at Geneva’s Graduate Institute. “At times of panic, of a crisis and so on, maybe being more out on a limb — taking a risk — would have been better.”
WHO waved its first big warning flag on Jan. 30, 2020, by calling the outbreak an international health emergency. But many countries ignored or overlooked the warning.
Only when WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared a “pandemic” six weeks later, on March 11, 2020, did most governments take action, experts said. By then, it was too late, and the virus had reached every continent except Antarctica.
A year later, WHO still appears hamstrung. A WHO-led team that traveled to China in January to investigate the origins of COVID-19 was criticized for failing to dismiss China’s fringe theory that the virus might be spread via tainted frozen seafood.
That came after WHO repeatedly lauded China last year for its speedy, transparent response — even though recordings of private meetings obtained by The Associated Press showed that top officials were frustrated at the country’s lack of cooperation.
Where did COVID come from? Five mysteries that remain. Posted March 10th 2021
In the wake of the World Health Organization’s investigation, there are still key questions about when, where and how the pandemic began.
Following a month-long fact-finding mission in China, a World Health Organization (WHO) team investigating the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic concluded that the virus probably originated in bats and passed to people through an intermediate animal. But fundamental questions remain about when, where and how SARS-CoV-2 first infected people.
As the international WHO team finalizes a report of its findings, which is expected next week, Nature speaks to four of the investigators about what they still want to know.
Was the virus circulating in Wuhan before the first known cases?
To trace the virus’s origin, it’s crucial to pin down exactly when the first cases occurred in people. The WHO team established that the first person known to have COVID-19 was an office worker in Wuhan with no recent travel history, who began showing symptoms on 8 December 2019, says Peter Ben Embarek, a food-safety scientist at the WHO in Geneva, Switzerland, who led the investigation. But the virus was probably spreading in the city before that, because it was well-established by later that month, he says.
Yet evidence of earlier spread has proved elusive. Researchers in China conducted an extensive survey of patient reports from hospitals in Wuhan made between October and December 2019, and identified fewer than 100 people who had symptoms of COVID-19. They then tested the blood of 67 of those people for antibodies generated by past infection with SARS-CoV-2, but found none. This suggests there wasn’t a large cluster of infections before December, or an unusual spike in deaths in the surrounding province of Hubei.‘Major stones unturned’: COVID origin search must continue after WHO report, say scientists
But Ben Embarek says the analysis should be repeated using less restrictive symptom criteria, to make sure that researchers spot all potential COVID-19 cases.
Scientists in China should also search for evidence of past infection in some 200,000 archived samples currently held at the Wuhan Blood Center and in other regions across China, says team member Dominic Dwyer, a medical virologist at New South Wales Health Pathology in Sydney, Australia. This would show whether the virus was spreading in the general population in China — not just among people who went to health facilities — before December 2019.
Some scientists not involved in the WHO investigation have already looked at blood-bank samples taken up to a year before the pandemic, in Guangzhou, southern China. (Close relatives of SARS-CoV-2 have been found in bats and pangolins in southern China.) Some of the samples tested positive for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, but Ian Lipkin, an infectious-diseases researcher at Columbia University in New York City, who worked on the analysis, says the test was not specific enough to say for sure that the antibodies weren’t caused by infection with other viruses. “There is a lot of laboratory work that needs to be done that hasn’t been done,” says Lipkin, who also wants to know whether there are autopsy samples from before December 2019 that could be studied for traces of viral genetic material.
Was the virus spreading in people outside China before December 2019?
Answering this question is also key to establishing the timeline of the first COVID-19 cases. Previously, researchers in Europe have reported1,2,3 finding antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in samples taken at blood banks from November 2019 onwards.
Ben Embarek says this doesn’t necessarily suggest the virus originated in Europe, but supports the idea that it was spreading in Wuhan before the first known cases. “Wuhan at that time was a very well-connected international city with direct flights to the entire planet on a daily basis. So if it was circulating in Wuhan, it could easily have been brought to other parts of the world through travellers, and circulating again, undetected, in different regions,” he says.
Still, he recommends that the blood samples from Europe be retested to confirm that they indicate cases of COVID-19. Some of them, from Italy and France, are already being reanalysed, he says.
What was the role of the Huanan market?
The intermediate animal that passed the virus from bats to people has not been identified, but researchers think it might be a wild species that is sold as food in ‘wet markets’, which typically sell live animals. Early in the pandemic, investigators homed in on the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, because it sold fresh and frozen animals and many of the earliest infections were in people who had visited it. But the lead went cold when other early cases were found that were not associated with the market. Viral material was identified in drains and sewage at the market, but none was found on any animal carcasses.
Still, the market is the only place where a large number of the people infected at the start of the outbreak were exposed to meat and animals. It’s important to establish how the virus got into the market and whether it was on an animal, says WHO team member Hung Nguyen-Viet, an environment and food-safety researcher at the International Livestock Research Institute in Nairobi.
Nguyen-Viet says the team identified ten stalls selling wildlife, either wild or farmed, that could have carried the virus into the market from farms in southern China. Some wild animals sold for meat, such as rabbits and ferret-badgers, are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 or the related virus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).
WHO team member Peter Daszak, president of the non-profit research organization Ecohealth Alliance in New York City, says the farms should be investigated to see whether there were infections in the animals or among workers. He also wants to know what animals were sold in other Wuhan markets. When the team interviewed the first person known to have COVID-19, he mentioned that his parents had visited a local community wet market, says Daszak.
Did frozen wild-animal meat have a role in the early spread of the virus?
The WHO team concluded that it’s most likely the virus jumped from live animals to people, but Ben Embarek says it is possible the virus entered the Huanan market through infected frozen wild animals from farms in southern China, and then sparked an outbreak. Daszak wonders whether frozen ferret-badgers sold at the market could have carried the virus. “These were carcasses skinned at the market, not just cubes of meat in a plastic packet,” he says.Can COVID spread from frozen wildlife? Scientists probe pandemic origins
Although researchers in China have also isolated viral RNA from the packaging of imported frozen fish4, Ben Embarek says the WHO team concluded that these goods were not likely to be the route of the virus’s first arrival in Wuhan.
Lipkin says there is no evidence that the virus entered the market through infected frozen wild animals. It could have just as easily been brought in by infected people who handled wild animals, he says.
Was the virus circulating in animals in China before the pandemic?
To establish which animal passed the virus to people, researchers need to find evidence of the virus in that species. Researchers in China tested some 30,000 wild, farmed and domestic animals in 2019 and 2020 but found no evidence of active or past SARS-CoV-2 infection, except in some cats in Wuhan in March 20205.
However, Ben Embarek says these surveys were not representative of China’s overall animal population, and that many more animals need to be tested for traces of infection, particularly on wildlife farms. “The amount of testing that’s been done is not sufficient to say, in any way, that wildlife farms were not carrying the virus,” says Daszak.
The explosive way in which the outbreak took off in Wuhan in December suggests that the virus was probably introduced once, through the wildlife trade, says Daszak. He says future testing should focus on farmed wild animals.
Johnny Vedmore Posted March 10th 2021
6 posts Johnny Vedmore is a completely independent investigative journalist and musician from Cardiff, Wales. His work aims to expose the powerful people who are overlooked by other journalists and bring new information to his readers. If you require help, or have a tip for Johnny, then get in touch via johnnyvedmore.com or by reaching out to email@example.com
Read More28 minute read
Is the real Klaus Schwab a kindly old uncle figure wishing to do good for humanity, or is he really the son of a Nazi collaborator who used slave labour and aided Nazi efforts to obtain the first atomic bomb? Johnny Vedmore investigates.byJohnny VedmoreFebruary 20, 2021
Read More19 minute read
Last year, the World Economic Forum teamed up with the Russian government and global banks to run a high-profile cyberattack simulation that targeted the financial industry, an actual event that would pave the way for a “reset” of the global economy. The simulation, named Cyber Polygon, may have been more than a typical planning exercise and bears similarities to the WEF-sponsored pandemic simulation Event 201 that briefly preceded the COVID-19 crisis.byJohnny VedmoreandbyWhitney WebbFebruary 5, 2021
Read More18 minute read
Official government guidance has been released in the United Kingdom to assist healthcare professionals in administering the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine BNT162b2. While the UK government goes to war against supposed misinformation, the official narrative is clearly based on very little to no supporting data from incomplete clinical trials. This article examines the document “Reg 174 Information for UK Healthcare Professionals” and narratives being pushed in the mainstream media that directly contradict that document.byJohnny VedmoreDecember 29, 2020
Read More15 minute read
Pfizer’s long history of scandals, and the fact that they have never been held to account for their crimes, continues to be ignored by the media, even as its experimental mRNA vaccine candidate for Covid-19 draws ever closer to US government approval.byJohnny VedmoreNovember 18, 2020
Read More15 minute read
Darktrace and Cybereason: The Intelligence Front Companies Seeking to Subjugate the World with the A.I. Singularity
Darktrace and Cybereason: The Intelligence Front Companies Seeking to Subjugate the World with the A.I. SingularitybyJohnny VedmoreNovember 3, 2020
Read More18 minute read
Daniel Korski: The Intelligence-Linked Mastermind Behind the UK’s Orwellian Healthtech Advisory Board
As a futuristic, hi-tech dystopia increasingly takes shape around us, the concept of the Panopticon is more relevant than ever as it functions as the underpinning of the ever-growing mass surveillance grid.byJohnny VedmoreOctober 1, 202
The new technology of repression: lessons from Ireland Tapa dura – 1 Enero 1974
The New Technologies of Political Repression: A New Case for Arms Control? Steve Wright Despite the lofty rhetoric in which world leaders pay lip service to human rights and development, the stark truth is that many so-called liberal democracies are helping tyrannical regimes industrialise repression. Future historians will be able to label the twentieth century as the dark age of torturing states rather than the relatively amateurish Spanish Inquisition in the sixteenth century. This paper explores technical ways that governments of major liberal democracies have actually backed state terror and state repression. It focusses upon a trade in special equipment meant to protect unpopular, illegitimate and authoritarian governments in the Third World against upheavals and insurrection. Until the 1980s, most political scientists tended to ignore the realities of current procedures and techniques of state terror and repression and deny any connection of such practices with Western liberal democracies. There are few government or academic grants to be awarded to those willing to probe the murkier realms of national security ideology and state terror. For an excellent discussion of why the social and political sciences have seemed blind to political repression see McCamant (1984). The issue of another arms trade built on the state security industry has also has been generally underexplored by the peace research community to date, apart from a few notable exceptions such as Michael Klare (1972, 1976, 1977, 1979, 1981, 1985; Klare and Arnson, 1981), Michael Stohl and George A. Lopez (1984, 1985), Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman (1979), Michael Randle (1980), Richard Falk (1977), and Miles Wolpin (1981, 1986). Thankfully, in the last few years substantial progress has been made to develop new critical theory in this field. Some of the first concise theoretical overviews and approaches to conceptualising and measuring state terror were provided by Stohl (1983) and Stohl and Lopez (1984, 1985). The US ‘Contragate’ scandal revealed some of the machiavellian ways that government can independently back state terrorism in other countries. Such episodes, and the suspicion that the facts on many more have been either covered up or creatively shredded, have understandably increased public nervousness about these issues. Indeed the last few years have seen a gradual blurring between military weapons and equipment sold to the police, intelligence and paramilitary formations. What is presented below is a series of snapshot summaries of research undertaken in this field, explaining what repression technology is and the ‘state of the art’; trends in research and development in the police-industrial complex; the main role and functions of the technology of political control; the dominant patterns of trade and who the key suppliers and recipients are. Using case examples from Britain and other NATO countries who supply the torturing states, there is also an attempt to explore the connection between this secret trade and what Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman (1979) have called the political economy of human rights and Johan Galtung (1971) has called structural imperialism.
Covid Conspiracy – preface to the following.
Over a million masks are dumped on Britain’s streets every week, presenting a massive health hazard from a germ laden mainly non bio degradable product taht has no real effect on limiting the virus – it just spreads fear.
Britain’s Matt Hancock has been implicated in some very dubious Covid lockdown contracts wasting millions of taxpayers money while enriching Tory cronies and overseas corporations. It is no wonder these people don’t want an end to lockdown. They are still getting paid and there are plenty of Stassi minded people inside and outside the police to keep order while the politcians, teachers and police have so little else to do. Now we have the following story. R.J Cook
Millions of high-grade NHS masks withdrawn over safety concerns Posted February 23rd 2021
By Phil Kemp & David Campanale
BBC NewsPublished26 minutes agoRelated Topics
Millions of high-grade masks used in the NHS may not meet the right safety standards and have been withdrawn.
The Department of Health told the BBC there are 12 million of these masks either in use or in hospital stores and has told staff to stop using them.
Distribution of some gloves has also been suspended because they may not meet technical requirements.
The Department of Health said safety of frontline staff was an absolute priority.
Its warning concerns a specific brand of FFP3 mask, which are more sophisticated than surgical masks and are worn in intensive care or when certain procedures are carried out that can generate aerosols.
These are tiny virus particles that can build up in stuffy rooms and have been linked to outbreaks of Covid-19.
The British Medical Association appealed last month for staff on general wards to be given this type of mask to guard against coronavirus infection.
- Call for better virus masks for all medical staff
- Coronavirus: Has the NHS got enough PPE?
- Covid PPE: Hospital gowns that cost £122m never used
The Department of Health and Social Care’s (DHSC) alert last week warned that a certain type of FFP3 – branded “Fang Tian” and marked as FT-045 – may not meet the required technical specifications.
It advised health and care providers to check to see if their stock included the product and to stop using them until further investigation.
The alert said the masks were provided by Polyco Healthline, but the manufacturer Suzhou Fangtian Industries told the BBC it had never supplied the firm.
The BBC has approached Polyco Healthline for comment but has not heard back.
The DHSC told BBC News the affected 12 million masks was a very small proportion of its overall stocks.
These masks make up approximately 4% of its overall stock, the department said, and about 1.7% of the masks used every day.
A spokesman said there was a “resilient supply” of FFP3 masks to ensure staff had access to the PPE they needed.
The DHSC also issued an alert about “nitri-hand” non-sterile nitrile examination gloves – 27 million of these have been supplied by Full Support Group since June last year.
The packaging for the gloves is understood to say they had not been tested for resistance to virus.
But the supplier, Full Support Group, told BBC News they had in fact passed the test and the packaging should have been amended.
“We are confident that the gloves in question, having been checked and confirmed that they meet the requirements, will be released from quarantine as soon as the administrative process has been completed,” a spokesman from the supplier said.
He added that Full Support had successfully supplied the NHS since 2002.
The DHSC said the batch of gloves represented a very small proportion of overall supply.
‘Urgent clarification’ call
But Rob Harwood, BMA consultants committee chairman, said it was “unacceptable if staff’s safety is still being jeopardised by inadequate PPE” a year into the pandemic.
“Healthcare staff working on the frontline do so facing the grave risk of contracting Covid, and deserve the best protection from this deadly virus,” he said.
“Many will be incredibly concerned to learn that some masks designed to offer enhanced protection, as well as gloves, may not meet standards, potentially placing them at greater risk.”
He said it was “good” to see immediate action but “urgent clarification” was needed to explain “how they entered the supply chain”.
The Department of Health and Social Care said: “Our priority is providing frontline staff with quality PPE that meets robust quality requirements, and we have delivered nearly eight billion items so far.
“We carry out extensive due diligence on all PPE items before release, and where an issue is identified we act quickly to isolate the relevant product and conduct the appropriate investigations.”
BBC News has been investigating the purchase of PPE for NHS staff since the beginning of the pandemic.
It has previously revealed how millions of face masks bought by the UK government could not be used in the NHS as intended.
Last week the High Court ruled that Health Secretary Matt Hancock had acted unlawfully when his department did not reveal details of contracts it had agreed during the pandemic within 30 days of them being signed.
The Unsettling Message of Judas and the Black Messiah Posted February 23rd 2021
The new crime thriller about a magnetic leader of the Black Panther Party is a sharp criticism of the FBI’s surveillance of social movements past and present.Elizabeth Hinton
“The Black Panthers are the single greatest threat to our national security. Our counterintelligence program must prevent the rise of a Black messiah from among their midst.” And so begins Judas and the Black Messiah, with an ominous speech from the FBI director J. Edgar Hoover (played by Martin Sheen) in 1968. The film, which debuted yesterday in theaters and on HBO Max, is part crime thriller, part civil-rights historical drama. It tells the story of the rise of the Black Panther Party’s deputy chairman, Fred Hampton (Daniel Kaluuya), and the informant who helped the FBI orchestrate his assassination, Bill O’Neal (Lakeith Stanfield). Judas, directed by Shaka King, profoundly illuminates COINTELPRO’s legacy of repressing Black freedom movements, the effects of which can still be felt today with regard to the Black Lives Matter movement.
Through King’s masterful storytelling and Kaluuya’s and Stanfield’s stunning performances, viewers learn why the Black Panther Party, created in 1966 by Huey Newton and Bobby Seale to fight against state-sanctioned violence, was referred to as a “Black-nationalist hate group” and subject to the most aggressive targeting by the FBI. Although Hoover also surveilled Martin Luther King Jr. and groups such as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, 233 of COINTELPRO’s 295 actions against Black groups were directed at the BPP. Judas provides an intimate view of what was arguably the most devastating of these COINTELPRO operations.
- Nomadland Is a Gorgeous Journey Through the Wreckage of American PromiseDavid Sims
- The Double Meaning of the American DreamAnne Anlin Cheng
- Chloé Zhao Is About to Be HugeDavid Sims
Early in Judas, O’Neal, who serves as the chief of security for the BPP Chicago chapter, is depicted serving breakfast to Black children (at one point, Hampton boasts that the chapter provided free meals to “3,000 kids a week”). O’Neal loads bags of food for Black families, and helps the organization provide medical care for Black residents. He attends political-education classes run by Hampton, who insists that “it’s going to take everybody” to win the war against “this racist, fascist, and nefarious U.S. government.” True to his inclusive politics, Hampton builds a “Rainbow Coalition” of “oppressed brothers and sisters of every color” with local Black gang members, the Young Lords (a radical Puerto Rican group), and the Young Patriots (a militant group of poor white people).
King’s depiction of the BPP in these scenes serves to undermine the FBI’s prevailing narrative about the Panthers. When the COINTELPRO special agent Roy Mitchell (Jesse Plemons) brags to O’Neal that he helped investigate the 1964 murders of the civil-rights heroes James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner by the Ku Klux Klan, he asserts, “The Panthers and the Klan are one and the same. Their aim is to sow hatred and inspire terror.” Panthers did exercise their Second Amendment rights to carry guns and, as King shows, engaged in shoot-outs with police in self-defense. But when O’Neal brings Hampton explosives and suggests that they blow up city hall, Hampton responds, “Are you out your mind?” King’s cinematic choice to show BPP members providing vital resources and services to Black Chicagoans pushes back against the dominant understanding of the Panthers in the American popular imagination: that is, as an organization that wantonly killed police officers and spewed hatred against white people in an effort to foment the Black revolution.
The film also explores the idea that COINTELPRO could not have won its war against the Black Panthers without the assistance of other Black people. Indeed, informants and spies such as O’Neal have historically undermined and sabotaged social movements at the behest of white authorities. Enslaved people prevented the separate rebellions plotted by Gabriel Prosser and Denmark Vesey in 1800 and 1822, respectively, by providing information to white slave owners. The first Black man who worked for what would become the FBI was a spy named James Wormley Jones, whom Hoover hired in 1919 to gather information on Marcus Garvey. With intelligence supplied by Jones to the FBI, Garvey—known as “Black Moses” to followers of his widely popular “Back to Africa” movement—was arrested, imprisoned, and eventually deported to Jamaica. In the 1960s and ’70s, O’Neal and some 7,000 other Black informants worked with federal agents to suppress Black radicalism until COINTELPRO ended in 1971, after the Citizens’ Commission to Investigate the FBI exposed its operations.
As Hampton rises to power in Chicago and continues to disrupt the racial status quo, he becomes even more of a target for the FBI. In the summer of 1969, Sheen’s Hoover delivers another lecture to a packed auditorium, instructing his agents to get Hampton’s “Black ass off the street.” Later, Hoover tells Plemons’s Mitchell that “your GI [ghetto informant, referring to O’Neal,] is our best chance at neutralizing Hampton.” Under increasing pressure from Mitchell, who threatens to expose him to the Panthers, O’Neal eventually provides the FBI with the floorplan of Hampton’s apartment—crucial intelligence that made possible the chairman’s brutal assassination.
The Black Lives Matter movement rose to national prominence during the protests in Ferguson, Missouri, after the August 2014 killing of the Black teenager Michael Brown by a white police officer. Similar to its response to the BPP, the FBI almost immediately began monitoring activists associated with the BLM movement and used Black informants to gather information on their activities. On August 3, 2017, the FBI’s counterterrorism division released a report declaring that “Black Identity Extremists” were a new threat to national security. Even though—as numerous lawmakers, civil-rights advocates, law-enforcement executives, and scholars have pointed out—Black identity extremism doesn’t exist, the FBI used the “BIE” concept to instruct agents on “how to police young Black activists.” (The agency has since discontinued use of the term.)
Less than a week after the 2017 report was released, a new violent social movement emerged. Beginning on August 11, militia groups and neo-Nazis marched through the streets of Charlottesville, Virginia. One white supremacist at the rally rammed his car into a group of counterprotesters, injuring 19 people and killing a 32-year-old white woman named Heather Heyer. At a press conference in the aftermath of Heyer’s killing, former President Donald Trump declared that “there were very fine people, on both sides.” White-nationalist, militia, and extremist movements have grown substantially in the United States over the past two decades, but have not experienced the same relentless pursuit by the FBI as groups designated “Black” and “radical.”
Like the false equivalencies that FBI agents in Judas draw between the Black Panthers and the KKK, the government responses to Black activists in contrast to white supremacists today are lopsided and misguided. When Black groups agitate for better living conditions and an end to systemic racism and police brutality, they are quickly labeled a threat to national security. Whether violent or nonviolent, many Black movements are criminalized, and law enforcement tends to become consumed with eliminating groups challenging white supremacy. The white supremacists, however, have managed to avoid the same level of surveillance, infiltration, and deadly outcomes. The state’s refusal to take serious action against the very real threat of white extremism helped culminate in the storming of the Capitol on January 6.
As Americans come to terms with one of the most destructive attacks against the state in U.S. history, Judas and the Black Messiah makes an urgent case for why the FBI, and, by extension, American law enforcement, must change priorities. Violence from white extremists poses a far greater threat to the country’s safety than activism from groups that seek to improve the living conditions of the most marginalized people. Judas deftly brings the disparities engendered by a surveillance state into focus, leaving audiences to wonder what this country would look like if the war on white supremacy were fought with the same implacable intensity as the one against the Black Panther Party some 50 years ago.Elizabeth Hinton is a professor of history, African American studies, and law at Yale University, and the author of the forthcoming America on Fire: The Untold History of Police Violence and Black Rebellion Since the 1960s.
Conspiracy of Conspiracies February 9th 2021
The greatest conspiracy is the one to get the world’s dumbed down masses, brains retarded by print , TV and radio propaganda , to be afraid and believe there is no such thing as a conspiracy.
Above , we see an EU bureaucrat complaining about attacks on EU officials , blaming social media. These people are on the constant lookout, just like all police stassi types , for excuses to control or ban social media , scaring weaker more stupid memebrs of the masses into conformity through fear.
The masses are cracking up. Protesters , going mad, are being called Covid deniers , when in fact most accept there is a virus called Covid 19 , but see no scientific evidence that it fatally affects more than the poorly , BAME religious and recent migrants and elderly.
They see no evidence that lockdown works. They notice that all was going to be well when the vaccine arrived. Now they are told they must wait until there is evidence it works and that it will cope with endless variants. Meanwhile they face bankruptcy will the elite gain billions from all this.
They think, quite reasonably, there must be a hidden agneda for this apparent lack of evidence and logic. They think there must be a conspiracy because borders have remained open to potential migrant carriers who seem to be above normal rules.
The young Geram left winger , pictured above, is lamenting that her country’s strict business killing lockdown from Mute Merkel – who must be obeyed – did not save her elderly relative who was already very ill before Covid appeared to kill him. She believes yesterday’s anti lockdown protests are symbolic of attitudes that killed him.
Like all left wingers , rather than isolate the vulnerable or admit how useless and incomptently staffed Europe’s health care system has become under the weight of massive illegal immigration, she demands more police action – the police must be loving this.
Some us think this a conpiracy to tighten the police state ,reducing scope for dscussion among the people and formation of an argument against their elite drive and elte beniffiting lock downa and masks , justified by melodramatic so called experts who are lackeys to this deception. But these days , dissenters are either nuts or subvserive.
Who is to say who is harassing who ? Certainly going against the elite consensus and the terrified masses, who seem incapable of seeing the logical solution of not exaggerating the dangers of the virus and the sense in only locking down the vulnerable,, stopping the lies that healthy young people will die of Covid , is the logical response because the current alleged remedy is worse than the cure. Hence inelligent non sheep suspicions.
It is amusing , conspiracies having been so normal throughout history – hence Brutus and the word brutal – that a self interested senior CIA officer should be so successful in making morons think any conspiracy theory is a sign of extreme paranoia and lunacy. And so we come to the apparently innocuous case of Carrie Gress and her innocent Christian based opposition to vile aggressive more masculine than msculine absurdly named feminism.
Professor Greiss has been on the recieving end of elite feminist pressure to have her book banned from the internet and social media. This is because she exhorts the virtues of traditional feminine behaviour in marriage as the bedrock of stable families. This obviously conflicts with feminism and LGBTQI vested interests and the blob mentality.
It is an obvious cosnpiracy far more serious than it might appear. Feminists and their left wing associates, backed by the self interested elite who fund mass brainwashing along with the ‘bread and circus ‘ mentality of day time TV, shut down any argumenst they can’t win , which is all of them. So they seize every opportunity to ban and shut down converstation if they can’t control it – all in the name of keeping women , children and BAME safe. I have ommitted the misguided LGBTQI blob , although feminists only have a problem with their rivals , the MTF transsexuals who tend toward the traditional female role model.
Feminists include radical lesbians and gays – the latter adore strong dominant feminists ( I could say why , but must obey the law and refrain ).
Just try not show how moronic you are by confusing a gay or transvestite fetishist with transsexual woman. Of course it is silly of me to try to talk sense to a moron. Only elite politicians know how to talk to and manipulate those people ,hence no shortage of conspiracy deniers.
It is the conspiracy to manipulate lockdown for elite gain that is the issue. No one denies there is a lot of super flu going around, They call it Covid. Meanwhile , official statistics show nobody in the U.K dying of flu, this year or last because apparently they all died of covid 19. How interesting.
FREE Delivery . Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we’ll deliver when available. We’ll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Quantity: Yes, I want a free trial with FREE Premium Delivery on this order.
Add to Basket Buy Now
Follow the author
The Anti-Mary Exposed: Rescuing the Culture from Toxic Femininity Hardcover – 1 Mar. 2019
- Kindle Edition
£7.77 Read with Our Free App
£0.00 Free with your Audible trial
Police State Britain February 9th 2021
UK Corrupt Police <firstname.lastname@example.org>To: email@example.com;07/02/21 18:251
This is just a quick message to our subscribers.
After the unlawful application by Lancashire police to bring a restraining order against me, stopping me from blogging about any Lancashire officers, I am about to begin proceedings for an appeal or to set aside the judgement of the judge, David Knifton.
David Knifton QC (part time judge) is linked to police and never disclosed this in the hearing;
Two officers intentionally committed perjury in the same hearing. Criminal proceedings will be brought against them.
The appeal is being crowdfunded and is likely to go to the High Court, we are hoping that we can get this crowdfunding to ensue a strong case is brought against Lancashire police and the applicant, who is the Chief Constable of Lancashire police, is held to account before he retires in April 2021.
Thank you all for your support.
Comment One could say a lot about this . The subject makes me feel sick. So I will confine myself to this , for the moment : “What else would you expect from the British Police State , the most sophisticated police state in the World. Its methods were used across an empire , used by Nazi cousins and techniques of oppression and corruption are exported across the world. with tried and tested Empire Building . Here is just one recent example of a country that has designed jails for Saudi Arabia, good old Britain. As my favourite history teacher often told me : ‘Beware the smile on the face of the tiger.’
Maxwell House Madam January 24th 2021
The peculiar thing about the entire Maxwell Epstein affair is how Epstein spent so long in an appalling prison environment where it was made possible for him to kill himself. I know it is possible to kill oneself in a cell because I almost succeeded last August and know how desperate one feels when the system decides you are guilty and sets about proving it by faking and hiding evidence.
But in this case this witness, as Epstein was , is gold dust if there is any sincerity about bringing high class sex abusers of young females to justice – there isn’t. The plot thickened when Prince Andrew was among the accused, known to have stayed at Epstein’s home as did Bill Clinton. Conveniently star witness Epstein broke his neck in two places.
Conveniently , Maxwell is starving herself in intolerable conditions of isolation and state squalo(u)r in a tiny cell . It would suit the system if she died too as she may well do. Meanwhile , Prince Andrew’s accuser is ignored or ridiculed and he appears to be above the law , like many British toffs before him.
I first met Maxwell’s father, Robert, when I was 8 years old when he was running against Tory resident MP Sir Frank Markham in 1959 , for the North Bucks seat. My Uncle Charlie and Aunt Flo provided his committee rooms. I thought he was wonderful and his wife contributed to my first book. He was an amazing man , besmirched many unfounded sex allegations , his death shrouded in mystery.
He often told the story of escaping from Hitler’s Nazis after they killed all of his family. The British recognised his talent , asking for a name to go by , he said “There was a coffee jar bearing the name ‘Maxwell House.’ ” And so came to pass ‘The House of Maxwell’ when , as Captain Maxwell’ on active service in France , he met his French wife.
He made many enemies but never lost my admiration. I am shocked by his daughter’s peculiar predicament. It’s a very sad end to what was an inspiring story to poor kids like me. It will no surprise me if Maxwell’s daughter , Robert’s pride and joy, is murdered to protect the high ranking devils she supped with. They certainly won’t pay for their crimes against under age girls.
How Ghislaine Maxwell was nabbed by the FBI via her cellphone
By Melanie Gray
Ghislaine Maxwell, seen here in a courtroom sketch, appears via video link during her arraignment hearing in July. REUTERS
Ghislaine Maxwell spotted the agents, heard them shout “FBI” and ran to another room inside her secluded New Hampshire compound, slamming the door behind her.
On a desk was a cellphone wrapped in tinfoil, a clue that prosecutors claim shows just how far the accused sex trafficker went to avoid being traced. But the cellphone was her undoing after months in hiding, one she used under the name “G Max” to talk with secret husband Scott Borgerson.
On July 2, two dozen agents stormed the compound and arrested Maxwell for allegedly conspiring with ex-lover and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein to lure and groom teenage girls for him. She has pleaded not guilty to the charges; he killed himself in jail.
The FBI had been tracking the British socialite’s number with cell tower data, but couldn’t come any closer than a square mile of her exact whereabouts. So, the feds turned to cellular intercept, a technology that NYU professor Ted Rappaport helped pioneer.
Every cellphone has two unique numbers — a Mobile Identification Number (MIN) and an International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) — that make tracking the location possible, Rappaport told The Post.
In the Maxwell case, the FBI obtained a search warrant July 1 that allowed agents to both send and receive signals from the fugitive’s cellphone.
How agents exactly hunted down Maxwell wasn’t laid out in court documents, but law enforcement agencies use two kinds of devices — one that plucks a transmission out of the air, like Rappaport’s Cellscope receiver created in the late 1980s, and one that masquerades as a cell tower.
A receiver, also called an IMSI catcher, “intercepts a transmission over the airwaves, locks on to it and allows a user to follow it with a directional antenna to find out where it’s coming from,” said Rappaport, 60, founding director of NYU Tandon’s Wireless research center.
And, he points out, a transmission doesn’t have to be a call, but simply a registration, or “heartbeat,” that the cellphone gives off every so often to indicate it’s on.
A cell tower imposter, also called a cell-site simulator, broadcasts a signal that’s stronger than a service provider’s tower, tricking a cellphone into connecting with it instead.
Civil liberties advocates fiercely object to all kinds of surveillance technologies, especially cell-site simulators, contending they both violate people’s privacy and the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.
“This tech that mimics a cell tower isn’t just picking up the unique serial number, it’s getting lots of others nearby,” ACLU staff attorney Nathan Freed Wessler told The Post.
The Justice Department does require bystander data to be deleted as soon as a cellphone is located and can be kept no longer than 30 days. Still, “there’s the inherent danger that police suck up information and violate people’s privacy,” Wessler told The Post.
Until a policy change five or six years ago, he said, the FBI “quite frequently” used cell-site simulators without warrants.
Agents had a warrant to go after Maxwell, though Wessler predicted her lawyers would file a motion asserting the FBI violated their client’s Fourth Amendment rights — a standard argument in all kinds of criminal defense cases.
For Wessler, a positive development stemming from the Maxwell case is the unsealing of an affidavit for the search warrant in a matter of months.
“Often, it takes a very long time and is hard for the public to know what kind of invasion technology that the government is using.”
Inside Trump and Barr’s Last-Minute Killing Spree Shock Horror January 15th 2021
Private executioners paid in cash. Middle-of-the-night killings. False or incomplete justifications. ProPublica obtained court records showing how the outgoing administration is using its final days to execute the most federal prisoners since World War II.
by Isaac Arnsdorf Dec. 23, 2020, 5:53 p.m. EST
ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.
In its hurry to use its final days in power to execute federal prisoners, the administration of President Donald Trump has trampled over an array of barriers, both legal and practical, according to court records that have not been previously reported.
Officials gave public explanations for their choice of which prisoners should die that misstated key facts from the cases. They moved ahead with executions in the middle of the night. They left one prisoner strapped to the gurney while lawyers worked to remove a court order. They executed a second prisoner while an appeal was still pending, leaving the court to then dismiss the appeal as “moot” because the man was already dead. They bought drugs from a secret pharmacy that failed a quality test. They hired private executioners and paid them in cash.
The unprecedented string of executions is often attributed to Attorney General William P. Barr, and his role was instrumental: It was Barr’s signature that authorized the use of a new lethal injection drug, his quotes that trumpeted the execution announcements and his position as attorney general that holds the ultimate authority in capital cases. (Barr is resigning effective Wednesday.)
But a ProPublica review of internal government records shows that Barr did not act alone. The push to resume federal executions for the first time since 2003 long predates Barr, with groundwork beginning as far back as 2011 and accelerating after Trump took office in 2017. It could not have happened without the help of Justice Department lawyers; officials at the Bureau of Prisons; two professors who endorsed the government’s injection method; conservative Supreme Court justices who dismissed final appeals; and Trump himself, who encouraged the executions and declined to commute them.
Get Our Top Investigations
Trump and his surrogates don’t shy away from this. Throughout the campaign they highlighted the executions as a contrast to Joe Biden’s opposition to the death penalty, reinforcing Trump’s “law and order” message. White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany even invoked the execution of Daniel Lee, who fell in with skinhead groups as a teenager and renounced those beliefs decades ago, to defend Trump after he declined to disavow white supremacists in the first debate.
“The activation of the death penalty and appearance of being tough on crime played into the administration’s political strategy — the same political strategy that pushed for separating children and parents and using force against peaceful demonstrators,” said Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, a nonprofit that tracks executions. “An administration which is concerned about the rule of law and which respects the Constitution would have allowed court challenges to proceed and would not have attempted to carry out executions under a procedure that could be declared unlawful.”
The Justice Department has killed 10 people since July, with three more executions scheduled before Biden’s inauguration. Most every federal agency is rushing to wrap up unfinished business, cementing policy objectives in ways that will make them harder for the incoming president to unwind. But the Justice Department’s pressing forward with executions, even after the election of a new president who opposes them, is uniquely irreversible.
The White House and BOP declined to comment. In a statement, the Justice Department said: “Seeking the death penalty and carrying out capital sentences is not a political issue, nor have political considerations influenced the department’s decisions. The death penalty is a law enforcement and public safety issue, and the department is obligated to carry forward these sentences regardless of who is the president or the attorney general.”
“Death Penalty All the Way”
A slim and shrinking majority of Americans support capital punishment, according to public polling. But it remains popular with Republicans, especially white evangelicals. That coincides with the strongest base of support for Trump, who, in 1989, famously bought full-page ads in New York newspapers demanding the death penalty for five young Black and Latino men who were wrongly accused of attacking a white female jogger in Central Park.
“Death penalty all the way,” Trump said at a February 2016 campaign event in New Hampshire. “I’ve always supported the death penalty. I don’t even understand people that don’t.”
Until this year, the Justice Department hadn’t executed anyone since 2003. This long interruption was as much practical as legal. A drug that most states and the federal government used in lethal injections, a sedative called sodium pentothal, became unavailable because the sole American manufacturer stopped making it. The drug shortage thwarted the Obama administration’s plan to execute convicted murderer Jeffery Paul. States began using a similar drug called pentobarbital, and in 2011 federal prison officials observed several state executions, according to court records.
Shortly after Trump’s presidency began, his first attorney general, Jeff Sessions, wanted to resolve these issues so that BOP could resume executions. Associate Deputy Attorney General Brad Weinsheimer said in a January 2020 deposition that Sessions began “conversations with staff and BOP to move forward on that.”
One of the staffers involved was Matthew Whitaker, according to Weinsheimer. Whitaker, who briefly led the Justice Department between Sessions and Barr, didn’t respond to requests for comment.
BOP made plans to use pentobarbital. But it had also become scarce as manufacturers shunned its use in executions. States resorted to using “compounding pharmacies,” which mix ingredients for custom-made drugs.
BOP planned to import powdered pentobarbital from a “foreign FDA-registered facility” but later turned to a domestic bulk manufacturer. It also hired a compounding pharmacy to create an injectable solution. The government has guarded vendor identities, since public scrutiny could pressure them to back out.
A sample of the compounding pharmacy’s solution failed a quality test by an outside lab. But according to Weinsheimer, BOP said the problem was the lab, not the compound itself, and sent a new batch to a different lab.
BOP also explored using a different drug: the opioid fentanyl. In a March 2018 memo, then-BOP Director Mark S. Inch said BOP found a fentanyl supplier but warned “there may be negative publicity associated with using a drug to which so many Americans are addicted.”
For unclear reasons, BOP planned to have the executions carried out by two private contractors, rather than government employees. The government won’t disclose the contractors’ names or profession, and it pays them in cash. “If we didn’t pay them in cash,” a BOP lawyer said in a deposition, “they probably wouldn’t participate.”
“Killing Is Not a Treatment”
BOP officials knew their new drug choice would face resistance in court; lawyers have argued that pentobarbital would flood prisoners’ lungs with froth and foam, inflicting pain and terror akin to a death by drowning. BOP worked to fend off those concerns with expert witnesses who would say the drug was humane.
Finding these experts was challenging because most doctors consider it unethical to have anything to do with executions. The American Medical Association and other professional groups prohibit any participation, including the “rendering of technical advice.”
“Doctors are experts in unkilling, we are not experts in killing,” said Dr. Joel Zivot, an anesthesiologist at Emory University who has testified that lethal injection of pentobarbital simulates death by drowning. “This is why lethal injection is so problematic. It impersonates a medical act, but it’s not about medicine at all. Killing is not a treatment. An execution chamber is not an operating room.”
The Justice Department would later claim that “BOP consulted with medical professionals” (plural). That is not exactly true. BOP engaged two expert witnesses. The first, Craig W. Lindsley, is a professor of chemistry and pharmacology at Vanderbilt University. He is not a physician or licensed care provider; he has a Ph.D., not an M.D. In May 2017, Lindsley wrote a two-page report for BOP stating that pentobarbital will take effect so rapidly the prisoner wouldn’t feel a thing. He concluded, “Of all the available options and protocols in use today, I believe this protocol to be the most humane.”
Lindsley declined to be interviewed, citing Justice Department instructions. He did not disclose his compensation, but he was hired through a contract with a consulting firm called Elite Medical Experts that the Justice Department paid $22,000 in the same month as Lindsley’s report. The company’s CEO, Dr. Burton Bentley II, did not respond to requests for comment.
BOP’s second expert witness was a medical doctor: retired California anesthesiologist Joseph F. Antognini. Antognini has said he personally opposes the death penalty as a Catholic. But he also said he believes states have a right to his advice, comparing it to criminal defendants’ right to a lawyer.
Antognini has not addressed how he squares his testimony supporting executions with his Hippocratic oath. He did raise ethical considerations when he was asked to compare lethal injection to poison gas (a comparison between methods, like the one Lindsley made). “Recommending one method of execution over another, I guess that’s an ethical issue for me,” he said in a deposition.
Antognini’s rare position as a doctor vouching for lethal injection has made him a valuable witness in capital cases, including a Missouri case that later reached the Supreme Court. Antognini charges $400 an hour, $2,000 for a deposition, $4,000 per day in court and $2,000 per travel day.
In a deposition in the Missouri case, which involved the same lethal injection drug, Antognini testified that pentobarbital would make the prisoner unconscious within 30 seconds and people can’t suffer while they’re unconscious. “Can you explain to me how you would have suffering in somebody who is unconscious?” Antognini said. “I don’t see how that can happen based on my understanding of how all this works.”
Yet just a few minutes earlier Antognini had acknowledged, “We don’t know how anesthetics work.” Scientists understand how the drugs act in the brain on a cellular level, he explained, but not how they produce unconsciousness.
The Supreme Court accepted Antognini’s pentobarbital testimony. Other courts have been skeptical, ascribing his views “little or no weight.”
Reached by phone, Antognini said he was busy and agreed to talk at a later time. When that time came, Antognini declined to comment. “I wish you all a very merry Christmas,” he said, and hung up.
“Some Objective Factor”
By the summer of 2019, BOP determined that its drug supply was secure and it was ready to schedule executions. The agency gave Barr a list of 14 prisoners, out of about 60 on death row, who had exhausted their appeals. The Justice Department has refused to disclose this list. (Court records include a list from 2017 with 10 names, but they must not overlap entirely because two of the prisoners who Barr chose in 2019 were not on the earlier list.)
Barr decided whom to execute with the help of the then-deputy attorney general, Jeffrey Rosen (set to become the acting attorney general), and aides including Paul Perkins and Timothy Shea (who later became acting U.S. attorney in Washington and now leads the Drug Enforcement Administration). The officials mulled executing all 14 but decided to start with five.
They chose the five, according to Weinsheimer’s deposition, for the same reason that Barr would publicly announce on July 25, 2019: They were “convicted of murdering, and in some cases torturing and raping, the most vulnerable in our society — children and the elderly.”
“There was an effort to find some objective factor in looking at the 14,” Weinsheimer said. “This was an aggravating factor that seemed to apply.”
In fact, that wasn’t true. Barr’s summary of the case of Daniel Lee incorrectly said he “murdered a family of three, including an 8-year-old girl.” The undisputed evidence was that Lee refused to kill the girl, so his co-defendant did. The co-defendant was sentenced to life in prison, while Lee was sentenced to death.
Weinsheimer said he didn’t know if there were other death row inmates who murdered children or the elderly. There were, according to a review by ProPublica.
Barr’s announcement also justified the executions on the basis that “we owe it to the victims and their families.” This also was not true in Lee’s case: Family members of Lee’s victims have publicly come out against executing him (as have the prosecutor and judge). The families of the four other prisoners’ victims supported the executions. In any event, the Justice Department didn’t consult victims’ family members when deciding who to kill, Weinsheimer said in his deposition.
The Justice Department also didn’t review the prisoners’ physical or mental health as part of its selection, according to Weinsheimer. One of the five, Alfred Bourgeois, had an IQ between 70 and 75, and his lawyers argued he is intellectually disabled. Another, Wesley Purkey, suffered from schizophrenia, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, which his lawyers said made him unable to understand the reason for his execution.
Weinsheimer said the Justice Department decided to schedule the executions in the order that the prisoners were convicted, with the oldest first. However, they were not the oldest capital convictions, according to ProPublica’s review.
As for the executions’ timing, Barr’s announcement did not explain why, after a 17-year hiatus, the first three executions were scheduled within one week of each other. BOP officials voiced concern that these back-to-back executions would put more stress on their staff, the agency’s lawyer said in a deposition. (After a 2014 lethal injection in Oklahoma went gruesomely awry, the state’s investigation concluded that one contributing factor was having two executions scheduled that day.) Nevertheless, BOP’s lawyer said the agency booked three executions in one week because of “guidance from the attorney general.” Weinsheimer denied that Barr gave a “direction” on how to schedule the executions.
Even prisoners who have exhausted their post-conviction appeals can go back to court to try to stop their execution once a date is set. A federal judge in Washington put the executions on hold in November 2019. The appeals court disagreed in April. Barr swiftly rescheduled the executions for Lee, Purkey and Dustin Honken, in a span of four days in July. In this announcement, Barr cut two from the original five (Bourgeois and Lezmond Mitchell), and added a new prisoner, Keith Nelson. The unifying theme, he said, was “murdering children,” repeating his inaccurate summary of Lee’s crime.
On the day Lee was supposed to be executed, the judge in Washington ordered a new injunction. The appeals court declined to intervene, so the Justice Department went to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court’s conservative majority has been consistently hostile to last-ditch reprieves in capital cases. “Courts should police carefully against attempts to use such challenges as tools to interpose unjustified delay,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in a 2019 case (the Missouri execution that featured Antognini’s testimony).
Trump Races to Weaken Environmental and Worker Protections, and Implement Other Last-Minute Policies, Before Jan. 20
The Trump administration is rushing to approve dozens of eleventh-hour policy changes. Among them: The Justice Department is fast-tracking a rule that could reintroduce firing squads and electrocutions to federal executions.
The conservatives have been equally unsympathetic to objections to lethal injection, considering that the court never found a constitutional problem with “traditionally accepted methods” such as hanging, electrocution and firing squad. “The Eighth Amendment does not guarantee a prisoner a painless death,” Gorsuch wrote in the Missouri case, “something that, of course, isn’t guaranteed to many people, including most victims of capital crimes.”
Early on July 14, five justices ruled that Lee’s execution could go ahead, saying that he had “not made the showing required to justify last-minute intervention.” Technically, Lee’s death warrant had expired at midnight, but the government issued a new same-day notice and went ahead with the execution around 4 a.m. Lee’s lawyers protested that there was still a separate court order that the Supreme Court hadn’t addressed, so officers left Lee on the gurney while government lawyers worked to wipe out that last obstacle. “That cautious step, taken to ensure undoubted compliance with court orders, is irreconcilable with the suggestion that the department ‘rushed’ the execution or disregarded any law,” Rosen, the deputy attorney general, wrote in a July op-ed. Less than an hour after a federal appeals court granted the government’s request, Lee was dead.
“Today, Lee finally faced the justice he deserved,” Barr said in a statement.
Later that day, at a White House press conference, Trump referred to Lee’s execution as part of his attack on the Democratic Party platform. “Abolish completely the death penalty,” he said. “You know what happened today with regard to the death penalty.”
Trump’s campaign was more explicit in an email blast the next day. “President Trump ensured total justice for the victims of an evil killer,” the campaign told supporters. “With the Trump administration slated to administer total justice to three more child murderers and rapists in the coming weeks, Biden should explain why they should be protected from paying the ultimate price for their evil, horrific crimes.”
That same day, July 15, Purkey was scheduled to die. Again after 2 a.m., a sharply divided Supreme Court lifted the outstanding court orders. Purkey’s lawyers rushed to federal district court for a new emergency stay on the basis that his Alzheimer’s and schizophrenia left Purkey unable to understand his sentence. But the Justice Department made clear that it would not wait to let that petition play out.
In a “courtesy notice” emailed to one of Purkey’s lawyers at 2:03 a.m. on July 16, a senior Justice Department official said the execution would go forward at 4 a.m., despite the new court filing. “Your colleague asked me whether the govt would delay the execution to allow the judge … to consider the stay application,” Hashim Mooppan, counselor to the solicitor general, said in the email. “In light of the Supreme Court’s orders today and on Tuesday morning, the government will not delay the execution further. Absent a court order barring the execution, the govt intends to proceed.”
The judge, in fact, did say the execution should halt while he considered the motion, but he swiftly denied it, and chastised Purkey’s lawyers for “procedural gamesmanship.”
“Despite the risk of irreparable harm to Mr. Purkey, the balance of equities do not weigh in his favor,” wrote the judge, James R. Sweeney II, who was appointed by Trump in 2017. Sweeney’s brief order did not specify what equities he weighed, but the government had argued that Purkey’s sentence had already been upheld multiple times.
As Purkey’s lawyers rushed to appeal, BOP went ahead with placing an IV in Purkey’s arm. He was dead before the appeals court made its ruling. The court later dismissed Purkey’s appeal as “moot” because he was already dead.
Honken died the next day, the third that week.
“A Personal Interest”
As prisoners desperately fought the government’s execution plans in court, they argued that overdosing on pentobarbital would be so excruciating that even death by firing squad would be less painful. Justice Department lawyers chafed at the suggestion. In response, they said firing squads were “more primitive” than lethal injection, and reintroducing them would be a “regressive change.”
Two weeks later, however, the agency took steps to do just that. The Justice Department proposed a regulatory change to authorize execution methods besides lethal injection, including firing squads, which remain legal in three states. “This proposed rule would provide the federal government with greater flexibility to conduct executions in any manner allowed by federal law,” the agency said. “The proposed rule would therefore forestall potential future arguments by prisoners in litigation.”
The proposal made other tweaks to the department’s regulations to address issues raised in litigation — not exactly admitting error, but tacitly acknowledging cracks in the government’s legal foundation.
While the proposal was formally signed by Barr, its point person was Laurence E. Rothenberg, a deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Policy. Though he is a career employee, Rothenberg’s LinkedIn profile picture shows him standing proudly with Barr, and he has staked out a public position supporting the death penalty.
In a 2004 law journal article (also published by the conservative Federalist Society), Rothenberg described the death penalty as “intrinsically just.” He also defended executing juvenile offenders against claims that doing so violates international law.
In another article, from 2006, Rothenberg and a Justice Department colleague attacked common critiques of the death penalty. “The extent of racial disparities in capital cases in the United States has been vastly exaggerated,” they wrote.
Rothenberg has said that his criminal justice views are shaped by a family tragedy. “I also have a personal interest in, and commitment to, this work, as the son of a murder victim,” he said in 2009 congressional testimony about a victims rights law. In 1974, Rothenberg’s parents were shot, his father fatally, on a trip to the Virgin Islands. The shooter was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison.
The regulation became final the day after Thanksgiving.
“It Didn’t Go Well”
For the next round of executions, Barr’s announcement simply said that the two prisoners, William LeCroy and Christopher Vialva, were “convicted of murder.” He gave no other reason or explanation for their selection.
Earlier this month, the Justice Department executed Vialva’s co-defendant, Brandon Bernard. Bernard was 18 at the time and did not pull the trigger. The prosecutor and five of the nine all-white jurors who convicted Bernard, who is Black, have since said his life should be spared. The reality star Kim Kardashian tried unsuccessfully to convince Trump to commute his sentence.
At the federal death row facility in Terre Haute, Indiana, the inmates are allowed to leave each other bequests, according to The New York Times. Alfred Bourgeois received his friend Bernard’s wrist watch for the single day before it was his turn to die.
Bourgeois was strapped to a gurney in the middle of a green-tiled room, an IV in his arm. As the pentobarbital flowed, Bourgeois’ stomach heaved and popped, according to George Hale, a public radio reporter who witnessed the execution. The apparent gasping for breath was consistent with how lawyers have described the drowning sensation that the injection could cause.
Spent some time reviewing my notes and @NPR coverage from the five most recent federal executions in Terre Haute, Indiana. The execution of Alfred Bourgeois last Friday stands apart from the others in several important ways. It didn’t go well.— George Hale | جورج هيل (@georgehale) December 16, 2020
Bourgeois’ death took 28 minutes, almost twice as long as Bernard’s. Hale said, “If Alfred Bourgeois was suffering that night, he suffered for a long time.”
There are three more federal executions scheduled in January — eight, six and five days before Biden’s inauguration.
What to Read Next
“Where They Countin’ the Votes?!”: New Video Details Tense Moments as Capitol Mob Sought Out Lawmakers
New video, found in an archive of data uploaded to Parler, includes a fresh look at the mob’s confrontation with Eugene Goodman, the officer credited for luring rioters away from senators during the early moments of the Capitol riot.
Allegations of racism against the Capitol Police are nothing new: Over 250 Black cops have sued the department since 2001. Some of those former officers now say it’s no surprise white nationalists were able to storm the building.
How one man went from attending President Barack Obama’s inauguration to dying in the mob protesting Donald Trump’s election loss during the Capitol insurrection.
Private executioners paid in cash. Middle-of-the-night killings. False or incomplete justifications. ProPublica obtained court records showing how the outgoing administration is using its final days to execute the most federal prisoners since World War II.
Ultimate Proof: Covid-19 Was Planned to Usher in the New World Order
Tuesday, September 29, 2020 10:34 1. Medical Doctors Declare That The Pandemic Was Planned
A group of over 500 medical doctors in Germany called ‘Doctors for Information’ made a shocking statement during a national press conference: (1)
‘The Corona panic is a play. It’s a scam. A swindle. It’s high time we understood that we’re in the midst of a global crime.’
This large group of medical experts publishes a medical newspaper on 500,000 copies every week, to inform the public about the massive misinformation in the mainstream media.
They also organize mass protests in Europe, like the one on August 29, 2020 where 12 million people signed up and several millions actually showed up.Learn How a 70-Year-Old Veteran Built a Small Nuclear Root Cellar (Bunker) in His Backyard With Only $421Click Here If You’re Ready to Give Up the Burden of Your Belly Fat, and Bring Excitement, Comfort and Satisfaction Back into Your Life…
Why do these 500+ medical doctors say the pandemic is a global crime? What do they know, that we don’t?
One of the many protests against the “plandemic” that you will not see in the mainstream media
2. Hundreds Of Spanish Medical Doctors Say The Pandemic Is Planned
In Spain a group of 600 medical doctors called ‘Doctors for Truth’, made a similar statement during a press conference.
‘Covid-19 is a false pandemic created for political purposes. This is a world dictatorship with a sanitary excuse. We urge doctors, the media and political authorities to stop this criminal operation, by spreading the truth.’ (2)
Germany and Spain are just two examples. Similar large groups of hundreds of medical experts exist in countries across the world.
In the USA a documentary called PLANDEMIC, which exposes COVID-19 as a criminal operation, is supported by over 27,000 medical doctors!
Why are these thousands of medical professionals worldwide saying the pandemic is a crime? What information do they have access to, that we are not getting from the mainstream media?
I invite you to look at the following facts with an open mind and then come to your own conclusions…Have You Been Struggling With Obesity But Can’t Figure Out Why? You MUST Watch This Now!
3. In 2015 A Testing Method Was Patented For… COVID-19
In 2015 a ‘System and Method for Testing for COVID-19’ was patented by Richard Rothschild, with a Dutch government organisation.
Did you catch that? In 2015 – four years before the disease even existed – a testing method for COVID-19 was developed. (2B)
Take a deep breath and let that sink in for a while…NEW Breakthrough Product Helps You To Look and Feel Better GUARANTEED! Must-See Video
4. Millions Of COVID-19 Test Kits Sold In 2017 And 2018
As we know the new COVID-19 disease appeared in China towards the end of 2019. Therefore it was named COVID-19 which is an acronym for Corona Virus Disease 2019.
Data from the World Integrated Trade Solution, however, shows something astonishing:
“in 2017 and 2018 – two years before COVID-19 – hundreds of millions of test kits for COVID-19 were distributed worldwide.”
‘Quick! Hide It!!’
This baffling data was discovered by someone on September 5, 2020, who posted it on social media. The next day it went viral all over the world.
On September 6 the WITS suddenly changed the original designation ‘COVID-19’ into the vague ‘Medical Test Kits’.
This is not allowed in trade, because you always have to be specific. There are many types of test kits for different diseases.
The fact that they removed the specification ‘COVID-19’, after this data became known worldwide, proves that they don’t want anyone to know about it.Deep Sleep – Energy – Vitality — This Trace Mineral Complex Will Change How You Feel
They however forgot to delete one detail: the product code for these ‘Medical Test Kits’ is 300215 which means: ‘COVID-19 Test Kits’.
Their cover up came too late: this critical information was uncovered and is being revealed by millions worldwide. You can download a PDF that shows the original data of this website.
Two years before the outbreak of COVID-19 the USA, the EU, China and nations around the world started exporting millions of diagnostic test instruments for… COVID-19, a disease that supposedly didn’t even exist back then.
6. The COVID-19 ‘Project’ Is Planned Until 2025Discover How To Survive in North America in Case of an Emergency
The World Bank shows that COVID-19 is a project that is planned to continue until… end of March 2025! So the intention is to continue it for another FIVE YEARS. (2C)
7. Anthony Fauci Guaranteed A Pandemic Within The Next Two Years
In 2017 Anthony Fauci made a very strange prediction, with an even stranger certainty.
With complete confidence Fauci announced that during the first term of President Trump a surprise outbreak of an infectious disease would surely happen.ALERT – Try This New Tech and You’ll Never Run Out of Clean Drinking Water Again! (VIDEO)
Here’s what he said: (3)
“There is NO QUESTION there is going to be a challenge for the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases.
“There will be a SURPRISE OUTBREAK. There’s NO DOUBT in anyones mind about this.”
How could Fauci guarantee a surprise outbreak to happen during the first term of the Trump administration? What did he know, that we don’t?
8. Bill And Melinda Gates Guaranteed An Imminent Global Pandemic
In 2018 Bill Gates publicly announced that a global pandemic was on it’s way that could wipe out 30 million people. He said this would probably happen during the next decade. (4)
Melinda Gates added that an engineered virus is humanities greatest threat and also assured this would hit humanity in the coming years. (5)
‘A global pandemic is ON IT’S WAY. An ENGINEERED VIRUS is humanities greatest threat. This will happen in the NEXT DECADE.’ – BILL GATES, in 2018
Let their choice of words resound into your mind for a moment…
They claim that the dense population of the world guarantees this imminent global pandemic.
But let’s be honest: most of the earth is uninhabited. Just fly over America in an airplane and look out the window. You see empty space most of the time, with a few cities here and there. Most of the United States is still wide open and empty.
The same goes for the rest of the world.
Australia, Russia, India, China, America, Africa… it’s wilderness for the most part. Our planet isn’t nearly as populated as Bill Gates wants us to believe. This world map shows it clearly…Learn How To Sharpen Your Focus, Improve Mental Clarity and Enhance Mood Functions
Most of the earth is totally void of any human presence. So the idea that the world is vastly overpopulated and is therefor bound to give rise to an imminent global pandemic is a lie.
[The powers that shouldn’t be also use this excuse to justify a reduction in the world’s population – i.e. depopulation.]
The Gates also claimed that air travel was sure to create a global pandemic. But countless people have been traveling in airplanes the past century.
Did that give rise to constant outbreaks of global pandemics? Of course not!Try THIS Smart Meter Shield and Cut Radiation by 98%! It’s Why the Illuminati Are Freaking Out! (VIDEO)
Their arguments why they guaranteed a global pandemic in the next few years are lies. So what is their real basis to make such guaranteed predictions?
9. Practicing For A Pandemic
A few months before the outbreak, Bill Gates – the world’s nr 1 vaccine dealer – organized an event in New York City. Guess what the event was all about? It was a ‘coronavirus pandemic exercise’.
Yes, you read that right:
Bill Gates organized a coronavirus pandemic exercise, right before it happened!Car Waxes are a SCAM. Amazing Product Repels Dirt for Years With Patented Teflon Protection!
On the large display in the auditorium, you see the text printed: ‘We need to prepare for the event that becomes a pandemic.’ This pandemic exercise was called Event201 and took place in October 2019, literally right before the outbreak.
Their conclusion was that all of humanity must be vaccinated…
10. Excitement About Selling Vaccines In The Next YearDiscover All the Edible and Medicinal Plants in North America in Case of an Emergency
Shortly after this ‘exercise for a coronavirus pandemic’ Bill Gates tweeted:
“I’m particularly excited about what the next year could mean for one of the best buys in global health: vaccines.” – Bill Gates, Dec. 19, 2019
Think about this: the world’s nr 1 vaccine dealer guarantees a global pandemic to occur in the next few years, and his wife said we should all fear an engineered virus that is ‘on its way’. Then they organize an exercise for an imminent global pandemic and say vaccines will be the only solution. Next Bill Gates tweets how excited he is about selling vaccines in the next year. Immediately after that, the announced pandemic breaks out.
Indeed, right away Bill Gates proclaims that the only solution for humanity is to buy his vaccines…ALERT – Try This New Tech and You’ll Never Run Out of Clean Drinking Water Again! (VIDEO)
11. 2020 Coronavirus Pandemic Predicted In 2013
Back in 2013 a musician wrote a song called PANDEMIC. In his lyrics he described a global pandemic that kills millions, shuts down economies and gives rise to riots.
His song literally described in great detail what we are seeing in our world today, seven years later.
He even mentioned the exact year of the pandemic: 2020, and the specific type of virus: a coronavirus. (6)
This is a line in his lyrics from 2013:Patented Copper Supplement! You’ll Never Believe What It Does Until You See the Blood Video!
‘2020 combined with CoronaVirus, bodies stacking.’
This song also predicted the riots that are now raging throughout America:
‘The State is rioting, using the street outside. It’s coming to your windows.’
How could this musician have known in 2013 that a coronavirus pandemic would break out in 2020, and that during this pandemic riots would erupt? He explains:
‘I did research back in 2012, and read the so called “conspiracy theories”. You know, those investigations the media doesn’t want us to look into. According to those theories pandemics were bound to happen in the decade of 2020 – 2030. So I wrote the song Pandemic about it.’Discover All the Edible and Medicinal Plants in North America in Case of an Emergency
12. Global Preparedness Monitoring Board In Sept. 2019: ‘Get Ready For A Global Coronavirus Pandemic’
In September 2019 – also right before the outbreak – the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board released a report titled ‘A World At Risk’.
It stressed the need to be prepared for… a coronavirus outbreak!
On the cover of the report is the picture of a coronavirus and people wearing face masks.FREE Invisible Night Vision Cap Light – Just Pay Shipping – Click Here For Details
In the report we read the following interesting paragraph:
‘The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.’
Did you catch that?
They have been practicing for a deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
13. Outbreak From China AnnouncedHow To Easily Manifest Anything You Wish Using Quantum Physics
In 2018 The Institute for Disease Modeling made a video in which they show a flu virus originating in China, from the area of Wuhan, and spreading all over the world, killing millions. They called it ‘A Simulation For A Global Flu Pandemic.’ That is exactly what happened, two years later.
Why did they say it would come from China? Why not Africa, where far more diseases are present? Or why not South America? Or India? How could they know there would be a flu virus coming from China and even show Wuhan as the originating area, that would infect the whole world?
Where did the virus come from? One of the world’s leading experts in bioweapons is Dr. Francis Boyle. He is convinced it originated from a bioweapon lab in Wuhan, the Bio Safety Lab Level 4.This is the Organic Biotin That Gives Beautiful Hair, Strong Nails and an Amazing Complexion!
This facility is specialized in the development of… coronaviruses!
They take existing viruses and ‘weaponize’ them, meaning they make them far more dangerous, to be used as a biological weapon.
In the following two minute video clip you see a spokesperson for the Trump administration, bioweapon expert Dr. Francis Boyle and president Trump talk about how this virus came from the lab in Wuhan.
Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a Chinese virologist (MD, PhD) fled the country, left her job at a prestigious Hong Kong university and became a whistleblower. She appeared on British television where she claimed SARS-CoV-2, the virus which causes COVID-19, was created by Chinese scientists in a lab – and she offered evidence to support her claims. You can read more on the subject HERE.
Now comes the most interesting part:Have You Been Struggling With Obesity But Can’t Figure Out Why? You MUST Watch This Now!
14. In 2015 Anthony Fauci Gave This Very Lab 3,7 Million Dollars.
Figure this: the same man who guaranteed a surprise outbreak of a virus in the next two years, gave almost 4 million dollars to a lab that develops coronaviruses.
In the short clip below you can see a journalist ask president Trump about this grant given by Fauci to the Wuhan lab.
There are however more options in Wuhan where this virus could have originated from. Some believe it came from the Wuhan Virology Institute, where they also work on weaponizing coronaviruses.
15. Chinese Biological Experiments To Infect Humans With Coronavirus Exposed In 2015 By Italian State MediaUS Nuclear Target Map. Do You Live in The Danger Zone?
Five years ago, Italian state owned media Company, RAI – Radiotelevisione Italiana, – exposed dark efforts by China on viruses.
The video, which was broadcast in November, 2015, showed how Chinese scientists were doing biological experiments on a SARS connected virus believed to be Coronavirus, derived from bats and mice, asking whether it was worth the risk in order to be able to modify the virus for compatibility with human organisms.
Below is a transcription of the Italian broadcast translated in English:
Chinese Biological Experiments
Chinese scientists have created a pulmonary supervirus from bats and mice only for study reasons but there are many questionable aspects to this. Is it worth the risk? It’s an experiment, of course, but it is worrisome.THIS is Why Glutathione is Called the Miracle Molecule for Health and Anti-Aging! (VIDEO)
It worries many scientists: It is a group of Chinese researchers attaching a protein taken from bats to the SARS virus, Acute Pneumonia, derived from mice.
The output is a super coronavirus that could affect humans. – (Source here, were you can read more)
16. Movies Predicted The Coronavirus Pandemic
Predictive programming is the process of informing the population about events that are soon to occur.
The past years several movies and television series were produced, about… a global coronavirus pandemic!Is This “Fat Blaster” Brain Molecule The Key To Shocking Weight Loss?
The film ‘Dead Plague’ depicts a global pandemic with a coronavirus and even mentions hydroxychloroquine as the cure.
Another film called ’Contagion’ shows how a coronavirus spreads globally with social distancing, face masks, lock-downs, washing of hands etc. as a result.
Literally everything we see now, is predicted in detail in these movies.
17. Pandemic Depicted During Olympics Summergames In 2012
Talking about predictive programming: during the opening show of the Summer Olympics in 2012, a coronavirus pandemic was played out for the eyes of the whole world.BEFORE IT’S NEWS ON TELEGRAM * GET THE TELEGRAM APP – https://telegram.org
Dozens of hospital beds, large numbers of nurses becoming puppets of a controlling system, death lurking about, a demonic giant rising up over the world, and the whole theatre was lit up in such a way that seen from the sky it looked like a coronavirus.
Why did the Olympic Games show a coronavirus pandemic, in their opening show?NEW Breakthrough Product Helps You To Look and Feel Better GUARANTEED! Must-See Video
18. Worldwide Lockdown Predicted In 2008
The author and investigator Robin de Ruiter predicted in 2008 that there would come a global lockdown.
He said the purpose of this would be to create a new world of authoritarian control.
Because much of what he wrote back in 2008 is now happening right in front of our eyes, this book has been republished.THIS is Why Glutathione is Called the Miracle Molecule for Health and Anti-Aging! (VIDEO)
19. Journalists Predicted Planned Pandemic
In 2014 the investigative journalist Harry Vox predicted a planned global pandemic and said why the ‘ruling class’ would do such thing:
‘They will stop at nothing to complete their toolkit of control. One of the things that had been missing from their toolkit is quarantines and curfews. The plan is to get hundreds of thousands of people infected with it and create the next phase of control.’ (7)
20. ‘Scenario For The Future’Discover All the Edible and Medicinal Plants in North America in Case of an Emergency
This renown researcher refers to a famous document by the Rockefeller Foundation in which everything we see happening now is literally predicted in great detail: the global pandemic, the lock-downs, the collapse of the economy and the imposing of authoritarian control.
It’s all described with terrifying accuracy… ten years before it happened!
The document is titled ‘Scenario for the Future of Technology and International Development’. (9)
That says it all: a scenario for the future. It has a chapter called ‘LockStep’ in which a global pandemic is reported as if it happened in the past, but which is clearly intended as a rehearsal for the future.CHAT/CONTRIBUTE ON TELEGRAM – https://t.me/BeforeitsNewsGroup
Rockefeller Foundation’s Operation Lockstep: ‘Under The Guise Of A Pandemic, We Will Create A Prison State’
The ‘Scenario for the Future’ continues with comparing two different responses to their predicted pandemic: the USA only ‘strongly discouraged’ people from flying, while China enforced mandatory quarantine for all citizens.
The first response is accused of spreading the virus even more, while the imposing of a suffocating lock-down is praised. Then it goes on to describe the implementation of totalitarian control:
“During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets.”Finally Revealed! Scientist Gives The Real Cause Of Weight Gain! See Video
Clearly the flexing of authority is the desired response. But it gets worse, according to this ‘Scenario of the Future’:
‘Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.’
‘In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests.’
Handbook For Global ControlTry This And You’ll Lose 15 Pounds of Extra weight in Your Colon! (VIDEO)
Now that the announced pandemic is indeed here, the same Rockefeller Foundation came forward with step two: a handbook on how to implement new control systems during this pandemic. Only when all the required control networks are in place, can the world open up again.
When you combine the two Rockefeller documents, you see the plan:
1) First they announce a global pandemic with a coronavirus and say what it should lead to: a whole new level of authoritarian control.
2) Secondly they give practical steps on how to apply this control system.
These are illustrations and quotes from their guide:The Secret To Manifesting Anything You Desire In Life
‘Digital apps and privacy-protected tracking software should be widely used to enable more complete contact tracking.’
‘In order to fully control the Covid-19 epidemic, we need to test the majority of the population on a weekly basis.’
According to their ‘Scenario of the future’ the entire world population should get a digital ID that indicates who has received all the vaccines. Without sufficient vaccinations, access to schools, concerts, churches, public transport etc. will be denied.Tiny Self Defense Tool Drops a 270 Thug In 2 Seconds – Get Yours Now!
Now in 2020 that is exactly what Bill Gates and many governments are calling for.
21. Bill Gates Negotiated $100 Billion Contact Tracing Deal With Democratic Congressman Sponsor Of Bill Six Months BEFORE Coronavirus Pandemic
nine months after the meetings with the Gates Foundation in Rwanda — Bobby L. Rush, a Democrat from Illinois, introduced the $100 BILLION H.R. 6666, the COVID-19 Testing, Reaching and Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act.
Everyone’s Contacts Must Be CheckedHENX – Light Years Beyond Colloidal Silver! Protect Your Family!
In a leaked government video (10) we see a conversation between former American president Bill Clinton and Andrew Cuomo, the governor of the state of New York.
They discuss how to set up a large control system to test the entire population and check all their contacts. They discuss how to build an army to carry out this control system.
A Whole New Level Of Global Control
Bill Gates also made it clear that only people who have been vaccinated against Covid-19 should be allowed to travel, go to school, attend meetings and work. (11)Tiny Self Defense Tool Drops a 270 Thug In 2 Seconds Flat – Get Yours While Supplies Last
Digital vaccine ID’s are already being developed (12) and Gates has a patent on the technology that makes it possible to trace an individual’s body anywhere. This technology is called WO2020-060606 (13).
Also very interesting to note: An Enzyme Called LUCIFERASE Is What Makes Bill Gates Implantable Vaccine Work
In addition, Gates wants to set up a global monitoring network, which will track everyone who came into contact with Covid-19 (14).
The Plan: Inject Mankind With DNA Altering Vaccine
The famous investigative journalist Anthony Patch did years of research concerning the plans to control the world, by means of created pandemics and mandatory vaccines. During an interview in 2014 this researcher predicted the following:THIS Humic Fulvic Complex Has Provided Major Health Benefits To Thousands. (See VIDEO)
‘They will release a man-made coronavirus. As a result the people will demand a vaccine to protect them. This vaccine will add a third strain of DNA to a persons body, essentially making them a hybrid.
‘Once a person is injected, almost immediately their DNA undergoes a transformation. This genetic change will cause people to loose the ability to think for themselves, without them even being aware this happened. Thus they can be controlled easier, to become slaves for the elite.’
Of course that sounds insane and it is insane indeed. Yet we have to be aware that this professional investigator is no fool. He has done years of research and this is what he discovered over the years.
We must be careful not to reject sound knowledge, based on years of research, simply because of our own lack of insight in these topics.
20 Years Of Research Say: The Vaccine Will Change Our DNAI Killed Bruce Lee with the Death Touch – Caution: Don’t Use it Unless Your Life is in DANGER!
Doctor Carrie Madej directed two large clinics in Georgia, before she went to the Dominican Republic to do humanitarian work. She studied DNA and vaccines for the past twenty years and made an urgent video in which she warns that there is a plan to inject humanity with very dangerous vaccines for Covid-19.
The purpose of these new vaccines will be twofold:
1) reprogram our DNA and make us hybrids that are easier to control.
2) connect us to artificial intelligence through a digital vaccine ID, which will also open a whole new realm of control.
This medical expert says she has observed multiple times how diseases were spread over populations by air craft. Because of satety reasons she is not able to share more details about this in public.Tiny Self Defense Tool Drops a 270 Thug In 2 Seconds – Get Yours Now!
Depopulate The Earth By Means Of Organized Epidemics
Dr. John Coleman is a famous Intelligence Officer from the CIA who wrote a book titled ‘The Committee of 300‘.
In it he explains how secret societies manipulate governments, health care, food industries, the media and so on. This book can be found on the website of the CIA. (15)
One of the primary goals of the many secret societies, that control governments and the media, is to depopulate the earth.
Dr. Coleman says the following about their strategy:
‘At least 4 billion useless eaters shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars and organized epidemics of fatal rapid acting diseases…’ – DR. JOHN COLEMAN, CIA INTELLIGENCE OFFICER
Maintain Humanity Under 500,000,000
In 1980 a granite monument was erected in Georgia, called the Guidestones. A set of 10 guidelines is inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages and a shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient language scripts.Your Body Cries for Iodine! Here’s What You Don’t Know About Iodine and Your Health!
The first guideline goes as follows:
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
The CIA officer Dr. Coleman revealed that one of their methods to ‘maintain humanity’ is to cause ‘organized epidemics of fatal rapid acting diseases’.
Using Vaccines To Reduce HumanityTry This And You’ll Lose 15 Pounds of Extra weight in Your Colon! (VIDEO)
During a TED talk Bill Gates echoed this goal, when he literally said that new vaccines can be used to reduce the world’s population with 10 – 15%! (16)
‘There are now 6.7 billion people on earth and soon there will be 9 billion. However, we can reduce that number by ten to fifteen percent if we do a good job with new vaccines, health care and birth control’. – BILL GATES, VACCINE DEALER
Covid19 Vaccine For Population Control?
Mike Adams is a published food scientist, author of the popular science book Food Forensics and founder of ISO-accredited CWC Labs.SHOCKING! Scientist Reveals The Real Cause Of Weight Gain! See Video
Years ago he said the following:
“An engineered bioweapon will be released in population centers. There will be calls for massive government funding for the vaccine industry to come up with a vaccine. Miraculously, they will have a vaccine developed in record time. Everyone will be required to line up and take this vaccine shot.”
There is indeed a release of an engineered bioweapon, followed by a vaccine mandate, massive government funding for the vaccine industry and a vaccine that is being developed in record time.
The rest of his message is that this vaccine will slowly begin to kill millions – if not billions – of people over the course of a few years. It will be a kill-switch vaccine, designed to reduce the world’s population.
SUMMARY: WAS THE PANDEMIC PLANNED?Try This New Way to Control the Matrix and You’ll Get Anything You Want! (VIDEO)
Thousands of medical doctors call the pandemic a global crime, and a world dictatorship with a sanitary excuse.
Two years before Covid-19 came to the global scene, the European Union, the USA, China and other nations suddenly started exporting tens of millions of test kits for Covid-19.
In 2013 a musician predicts a global pandemic with a coronavirus and says this will happen in 2020. He knew this because of personal investigation of so called ‘conspiracy theories’.
In 2017 Anthony Fauci guaranteed a surprise outbreak of an infectious disease during the first term of the Trump administration.
Right before the outbreak of a coronavirus pandemic, Bill Gates organized a global coronavirus pandemic exercise: Event201.Discover All the Edible and Medicinal Plants in North America in Case of an Emergency
Right before the outbreak the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board told the world to be ready for a coronavirus pandemic.
In 2018 the Institute for Disease Modeling announced a global pandemic with a flu virus, originating in China in the area of Wuhan.
In 2018 Bill and Melinda Gates announced that in the coming years there would be a global pandemic of an engineered virus.
The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 was created in the Bio Safety Lab Level 4 in Wuhan, which received millions of dollars from Anthony Fauci.
Several movies depicted the coronavirus pandemic with great detail, and even mention hydroxychloroquine as the cure.Try This New Way to Control the Matrix and You’ll Get Anything You Want! (VIDEO)
The Summer Olympics in 2012 played a pandemic of a coronavirus during their opening show.
The investigative journalist Harry Vox predicted in 2014 that a global pandemic would be caused, so the ‘ruling class’ could implement a higher level of authoritarian control.
The investigative journalist Anthony Patch predicted a global pandemic with a man made virus, that would be used to force a DNA altering vaccine on humanity.
Dr. Carrie Madej studied DNA and vaccines for decades and says the plan is to use the Covid-19 vaccine to start the process of transhumanism: reprogramming the human DNA.
The CIA officer Dr. John Coleman studied secret societies and says their goal is to depopulate the earth by means of organized pandemics of fatal rapid acting diseases.US Nuclear Target Map. Do You Live in The Danger Zone?
In the state of Georgia a huge monument was erected in 1980 with ten guidelines for humanity, in eight languages. The first of these ‘Ten Commandments’ is that humanity needs to be reduced to half a billion people.
Bill Gates said during a TED talk that new vaccines can be used to reduce the world’s population with 10-15%.
The ‘health ranger’ Mike Adams predicted years ago what we see happening now: the release of an engineered bioweapon, followed by a vaccine mandate, massive government funding for the vaccine industry and a vaccine that is being developed in record time. He also predicted that this vaccine will kill innumerable people over the course of a couple of years.
In 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation published the ‘Scenario for the future…’ in which they describe a coming global pandemic, that should result in the implementation of authoritarian control over the people, which will then intensify after the pandemic.
In 2020 they publish a handbook on how to create this world of control, with a step by step guide. They say life cannot return back to normal, until the world has become ‘Locked Down’ with this top down control from authoritarian governments.Experience Vitality – Directly From Nature – Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex
We indeed see that Bill Gates and many others worldwide are right away seizing control in unprecedented ways, with enforcing vaccine ID’s, microchips that will be implanted into people, mandating the wearing of face masks, social distancing, forced lock-downs, extreme contact tracing, and so on.
Part of this top down control is extreme censoring of every single voice from doctors, scientists or other experts that criticize what is going on.
All Predictions Were Done Shortly Before It Happened
Note that every single prediction of this pandemic was announced a few years or even months before it happened. That is significant.
Gates and Fauci lie to their audience when they say ‘history tells us this will happen’, but there is no historic basis for guaranteeing a global coronavirus pandemic to occur within a few months or years.Discover How To Survive in North America in Case of an Emergency
Never in history did anything like this occur, on such a global scale.
The fact that such a historically unique event was predicted in great detail – by movies, shows, investigators, medical doctors, those who finance labs that develop these viruses, those who earn billions from these pandemics, those who want to create a whole new level of control in our world, etc. – shows it was planned.
Are There Signs That The Pandemic Is Being Manipulated?
So far we have looked at indications that the pandemic was planned beforehand. If it is indeed orchestrated, then that should also be obvious during the pandemic. A planned pandemic is also a controlled pandemic.
The Plan To Control The WorldWhat Vitamin Gives You Beautiful Hair, Strong Nails, Amazing Skin and Helps Lose Weight? (VIDEO)
You may have heard the word ‘globalists’ before, but for those who aren’t familiar with it: these are people around the world who plan to create one global government, so they can have total global control over health, religion, finances – everything.
They recently came together in an event called DAVOS, where they expressed how the pandemic will be used to deploy their plans.
Here are some of the statements they made: (18)
‘Now is the historic moment in time, not only to fight the virus, but TO SHAPE THE SYSTEM.
The pandemic represents a window of opportunity to RESET OUR WORLD.I Killed Bruce Lee with the Death Touch – Caution: Don’t Use it Unless Your Life is in DANGER!
The world must act jointly and swiftly to REVAMP ALL ASPECTS of our societies and economies, from educational to social contacts and working conditions.
EVERY COUNTRY, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be TRANSFORMED.’ – Klaus Schwab, Funder of the World Economic Forum
A major leader of gobalism, is the World Economic Forum, founded by Klaus Schwab. He created a ‘spinning wheel’ with all their objectives. On it we can see the following three ‘projects’: Covid19 followed by Global Governance, and Internet Governance.
Nobody Wants These Organizations
Not a single human on the earth has voted for these organizations to even exist, let alone take full control of our lives, families, communities, jobs, health, industries, etc. Yet they present themselves as our ‘world leaders’ who are planning our entire future.
The World Health Organization presents itself as the global boss over our health, without anyone of us having chosen for them.
They apply a tyranny in mainstream media and social media, where no expression of medical or scientific expertise is allowed, unless it is in line with the guidelines of this ‘World’ organization.Tiny Self Defense Tool Drops a 270 Thug In 2 Seconds – Get Yours Now!
Tens of thousands of medical doctors and scientists have been censored all over the world, by Facebook, Youtube and Twitter. Why? Because these social media giants state that ONLY what the World health Organization says, is true.
All of humanity must submit to these people who have positioned themselves over all of us, without ever asking our opinion or even consulting with other medical experts.
In fact, every single medical expert speaking out against their decisions is censored.
This means complete loss of medical freedom, loss of freedom of speech, loss of true science, loss of true journalism and an imposing of dictatorships by organizations that nobody voted for, lead by people nobody wanted and yet they simply seize ownership of our world.
They are the big fat mean bully on the playground, that plays boss over everyone.Tiny Self Defense Tool Drops a 270 Thug In 2 Seconds Flat – Get Yours While Supplies Last
World Health Organization Is Run By A Terrorist
The Department of Homeland Security clearly states:
“The TPLF qualifies as a Tier III terrorist organization… on the basis of its violent activities…”HENX – Light Years Beyond Colloidal Silver! Protect Your Family!
Let this get through to you: the man directing the World Health Organization is literally a communist terrorist, who has been involved in murdering thousands of innocent people, trying to impose communism on Ethiopia.
And this man is bullying the entire world, telling all of us what we can and cannot do, censoring every medical professional who has a different opinion, demanding blind obedience from all of humanity, while imposing mandates to be vaccinated by their number one financial sponsor: Bill Gates.
Is this the world you want to live in, from now on?
More And More Pandemics, Untill Mankind Submits
These globalists even threaten humanity with more suffering, if we don’t submit to their total control. Prince Charles recently joined DAVOS and publicly stated:Have You Been Struggling With Obesity But Can’t Figure Out Why? You MUST Watch This Now!
“There will be more and more pandemics, if we don’t do ‘the great reset’ now.” (18)
Bill Gates already calls this ‘pandemic one’ and is talking about ‘pandemic two and three’.
The investigator who back in 2013 predicted a coronavirus pandemic to occur in 2020, followed by riots, said the plan is to create series of pandemics during 2020-2030.
This decade is the selected timeframe to turn the world into one big banana republic, run by mad powerhungry men, who depopulate the earth, and enslave the rest of humanity.
They are planning to cause as many pandemics as needed, in order to break the back of humanity, until everybody submits to their global control.How To Manifest Anything You Desire In Life
Are you beginning to understand why more than 500 medical doctors from Germany, 600 doctors from Spain, thousands of medical experts from the USA and many more all over the world are calling this pandemic a ‘global’ crime’?
Leaders Of Catholic Church Warn Humanity
An archbishop and several cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church wrote a letter to humanity, to warn us for gloval tyranny under the guise of Covid-19.
This is an excert of this historic message, that has been translated in many languages and was sent to leaders all over the world. (20)
“We have reason to believe, on the basis of official data on the incidence of the epidemic as related to the number of deaths, that there are powers interested in creating panic among the world’s population with the sole aim of permanently imposing unacceptable forms of restriction on freedoms, of controlling people and of tracking their movements. The imposition of these illiberal measures is a disturbing prelude to the realization of a world government beyond all control.”Finally Revealed! Scientist Gives The Real Cause Of Weight Gain! See Video
Is There Hope? What Can We Do?
Is there any hope for our future, or are we surrendered to the merciless hands of these wicked mega-billionaires who want to depopulate the earth and seize total control over humanity?
Yes, there is hope. The future is brighter than we can even imagine!
This is not a doom and gloom scenario, but a wake up call for humanity to stop blindly believing the mafia-media and perverse politicians, and rise up as one for a future of freedom.BEFORE IT’S NEWS ON TELEGRAM * GET THE TELEGRAM APP – https://telegram.org
I invite you to join a unique and historic movement of Global Freedom Fighters, who will lead humanity into a new era of hope, restoration and more freedom than we have ever known.
Source: StopWorldControl.com / References:
Source: http://tapnewswire.com/2020/09/ultimate-proof-covid-19-was-planned-to-usher-in-the-new-world-order/ You May Like: MD: if You Have Toenail Fungus, Do This Immediately (Watch) 60 Second Ritual Rebuilds Your Teeth and Gums (Watch) If You Like to Play, this City-Building Game is a Must-Have. No Install. If You Like to Play, this City-Building Game is a Must-Have. No Install. If You Like to Play, this City-Building Game is a Must-Have. No Install. If You Like to Play, this City-Building Game is a Must-Have. No Install.
Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
Wanted: Citizen Reporters,
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
Kim Clement Prophesy over President Trump for 2020 – 2 terms !!! US Nuclear Target Map. Do You Live in The Danger Zone?