Other Sites

Advertisements On Off Patriots Only

Log In

Patriots

TRENDING 1 ‘It Was A Mistake’: Here’s What Prince Andrew And Jeffrey Epstein’s Other Partygoers Have Said Analysis 2 Bloomberg News Pledges Not To Investigate Democratic Presidential Candidates Media 3 Here’s Why Biden’s Supporters Think He Is Floundering In Iowa Politics 4 Outlets That Ripped Apart Bristol Palin’s 2008 Teen Pregnancy Gloss Over Hunter Biden’s Alleged New Kid Media 5 Democratic Anxiety Rises Over Impending Thanksgiving Anti-Impeachment Ads: Report Politics

Advertisements On Off Patriots Only

Free trial Pricing Modern Love

  • Home
  • Society
  • UK society is increasingly divided by class

Wednesday, 17 September 2014

UK society is increasingly divided by class

Bully boys: Are the top jobs in the country only available to a privileged few?

A new film about privileged youth has sharpened the debate about class division in modern Britain. Top jobs increasingly go to the privately educated. Whatever happened to meritocracy?

‘Filthy. Rich. Spoilt. Rotten.’ reads the tag line for ‘The Riot Club’. Out this week, the film was inspired by the activities of the Oxford University Bullingdon Club, notorious for its social exclusivity and drunken vandalism.

It is intended as a satire on the club’s members, who have included the current Prime Minister, the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Mayor of London, and the persistence of class in modern Britain. But critics have noted that the production itself makes this point. Finding actors to play the film’s rich, privileged characters wasn’t hard — there’s no shortage of young public-school talent out there. And two of those they chose, Freddie Fox and Max Irons, had famous acting fathers too.

Recently actors, including Dame Judi Dench, have argued that it has become increasingly hard for anyone except the children of the rich to break into acting. Many of our current best actors were privately educated, like Damian Lewis, Benedict Cumberbatch, Eddie Redmayne and Dominic West. That’s fine, but where’s everyone else? Hefty drama school fees and the expense of living in the early, underpaid days are pricing working-class people out of the profession.

And acting is only the tip of the iceberg of privilege. According to a report published by the Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission last month, three quarters of the senior judiciary, a third of the English rugby and cricket teams and two thirds of the senior armed forces attended fee-paying schools, as did a majority of senior journalists, editors and broadcasters. Yet just 7% of the UK population attend private schools.

Last week, the leader of the TUC, Frances O’Grady criticised an era of ‘silver spoons’, widening pay gaps and class prejudice; a society similar to that seen in the TV series ‘Downton Abbey’. Improving access to higher education, with its qualifications, networks and opportunities, is frequently suggested as a way to counter this rising inequality.

Nice jobs for nice people

Some say that leading universities must be forced to impose quotas on the numbers of privately educated students in publicly funded higher education. If universities reflect a more balanced and diverse cross-section of society, eventually, so too will the top professions. Only that will break the power of privilege.

Others say this would amount to dangerous social engineering and destroy the reputation of the UK’s world-class universities. It would unfairly punish private school students simply for their background. Instead, massive investment and improvement in state schooling is required, combined with serious public commitment from all publicly funded institutions to ensure access for all.

You Decide

  1. Is Britain a deeply unequal society?
  2. Are university quotas a good idea?

Activities

  1. In groups, make a list of reasons why diversity in public life and the top professions is important.
  2. Create your own infographic using the statistics in this story and in our expert links.

Some People Say…

“Deep down we are in love with the idea of the upper class.”

What do you think?

Q & A

Why should I care about elitism? This story concerns all of us because it asks us what kind of society we want to live in. If Britain’s judges, politicians and journalists all attended the same schools and universities, read the same books and heard the same lectures, it might mean that the top professions are losing out on a lot of talent and creativity from elsewhere. This might make us less inclined to trust their judgments, their ability to run the country, or to report on the issues that matter. Is it a hopeless situation? No, and recently more attention has been devoted to the issue. Universities are under greater pressure to make sure they offer places to state-school pupils and companies are increasingly refusing to take into account what school or university an applicant attended.

Word Watch

Members Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, the Chancellor George Osborne and Prime Minister David Cameron were all members of the Bullingdon Club while studying at Oxford. However in recent years they have distanced themselves from it. Johnson has described the club as ‘a truly shameful vignette of almost superhuman undergraduate arrogance, toffishness and twittishness.’ Social mobility A person’s ability to move between classes. In 2013, more than 161,000 people took part in the Great British Class Survey, which revealed that there are seven classes in Britain, ranging from the ‘elite’ down to the ‘precarious proletariat.’ TUC The Trades Union Congress represents the majority of trade unions in the UK. Frances O’Grady Ironically, O’Grady’s televised speech was interrupted with the news that the Duchess of Cambridge was pregnant with her second child.

Become an Expert

Subjects

Tags

PDF Download

Please click on “Print view” at the top of the page to see a print friendly version of the article.

Share Article

What is a Blog? – The Definition of Blog, Blogging, and Blogger

what is a blog image

(Published on: April 8th, 2018 Last updated: October 29th, 2019) Posted in: Blogging75 CommentsWritten by
Anya Skrba

Do you know what blogs are? If you don’t, then you’ve come to the right place. In the beginning, a blog was more of a personal diary that people shared online, and it goes back to 1994. In this online journal, you could talk about your daily life or share things you do. But, people saw an opportunity to communicate any information in a new way. So began the beautiful world of blogging.

What is a Blog?

Definition of blog

A blog (shortening of “weblog”) is an online journal or informational website displaying information in the reverse chronological order, with latest posts appearing first. It is a platform where a writer or even a group of writers share their views on an individual subject.

What is the purpose of a blog?

There are many reasons for starting a personal blog and only a handful of strong ones for business blogging. Blogging for business, projects, or anything else that might bring you money has a very straightforward purpose – to rank your website higher in Google SERPs, a.k.a. increase your visibility.

As a business, you rely on consumers to keep buying your products and services. As a new business, you rely on blogging to help you get to these consumers and grab their attention. Without blogging, your website would remain invisible, whereas running a blog makes you searchable and competitive.

So, the main purpose of a blog is to connect you to the relevant audience.

Another one is to boost your traffic and send quality leads to your website.

The more frequent and better your blog posts are, the higher the chances for your website to get discovered and visited by your target audience. Which means, a blog is an effective lead generation tool. Add a great call to action (CTA), and it will convert your website traffic into high-quality leads.

But a blog also allows you to showcase your authority and build a brand.

When you use your niche knowledge for creating informative and engaging posts, it builds trust with your audience. Great blogging makes your business looks more credible, which is especially important if your brand is still young and fairly unknown. It ensures presence and authority at the same time.

Blog structure

The appearance of blogs changed over time, and nowadays blogs include different items. But, most blogs include some standard features and structure. Here are common features that a typical blog will include:

  • Header with the menu or navigation bar
  • Main content area with highlighted or latest blog posts
  • Sidebar with social profiles, favorite content, or call-to-action
  • Footer with relevant links like a disclaimer, privacy policy, contact page, etc.
Basic blog structure

Feel free to use this template on your site

<a href=”https://firstsiteguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/What-is-a-Blog-2.png” alt=”Basic blog structure”></a><br />Basic Blog Structure free template was created by <a href=”https://firstsiteguide.com/”>FirstSiteGuide.com</a> team.

Above example is the basic structure of the blog. Each item has its own importance and helps visitors to navigate through your blog.

Blogs and websites

A majority of people still wonder whether there is any difference between a blog and a website. What is a blog and what is a website? It’s even more challenging to differentiate between the two today. Many companies are integrating blogs into their sites to perform the same function.

What differentiates blogs from websites?

Blogs need frequent updates. Good examples include a food blog sharing meal recipes or a company writing about their industry news.

Blogs promote perfect reader engagement. Readers get a chance to comment and voice their different concerns to the viewer. Static websites, on the other hand, consists of the content presented on static pages. Static website owners rarely update their pages. Blog owners update their site with new blog posts on a regular basis.

Key elements that identify a blog post from a static page include a publishing date, author reference, categories, and tags within a byline. While not all blog posts have all those byline elements, static website pages do not have any of these items.

From a visitor perspective, the content on a static site will not change from one visit to the next. The content on a blog, yet, has the potential to offer something new each day, week, or month. Depending on the blog owner’s publishing schedule.

What is blogging?

In the early 2000s, blogging emerged in all different phases when several political blogs were born. Also, blogs with how-to manuals began to appear. Established institutions began to note the difference between journalism and blogging.

Definition of blogging

Blogging is the set of many skills that one needs to run and control a blog. Equipping web page with tools to make the process of writing, posting, linking, and sharing content easier on the internet.

Why is blogging so popular?

It’s important to mention that blogging grows with each passing day! Hence, to answer the question ‘what is blogging’ we need to look at the factors behind its rise.

In the early stages, blogs became mainstream, as news services began using them as tools for outreach and opinion forming. It became a new source of information.

Why is blogging so popular

Businesses saw a good way to improve the customer’s level of satisfaction. Through blogging, companies keep clients and customers up to date. The more people visit your blog, the more exposure and trust your brand gets.

Personal and niche bloggers, saw the potential to reach more people interested in specific topics. Through a blog, visitors can comment and interact with you or your brand which helps you create a network of loyal followers.

Did you know you could earn money through blogging? Once your blog gets enough attention and fans, you can look into ways of monetizing your blog. Through the blog, you can offer your services and sell products.

Who is a blogger?

In recent times, bloggers have become famous for various reasons. An alternative career or job to many, more people are choosing to join the ranks. So who are bloggers? These are individuals who love sharing parts of their lives with you. They post various topics from arts, home designs, carpentry, and finance articles. Bloggers are mobile and don’t need to be in one place. They live on the internet!

Definition of blogger

A blogger is someone who runs and controls a blog. He or she shares his or her opinion on different topics for a target audience.

Why are many people blogging today?

Would you want to have a blog of your own? Yes! Most people today are creating a blog for various reasons. Every human being has its story to tell. Hence, through the internet, bloggers can communicate to a larger group of people.

Why is blogging so popular? Blogs allow you to talk about any topics and express your opinion. You’ll find some bloggers writing on every activity that took place during the day. These may range from small issues such as waking up, to major issues like human rights and climate changes! Remember that as a blogger running your own blog, you need to rely on the topics that you love and strive to become one of the best blogs on the web.

Are bloggers getting paid?

Bloggers do earn money, but this is not a get-rich-quick kind of profession.

Before you can start monetizing your blog, you need to build both your Google SERPs ranking and your niche influence. And that takes plenty of time and quality content. Money-making opportunities won’t present themselves until you’ve gained some credibility in the field. So, get down to business.

Here’s how you can make good money as a top-ranked niche blogger:

  • Selling ad space on your blog privately or via Google AdSense.
  • Becoming an affiliate partner privately or through ad networks.
  • Selling your own digital products such as eBooks and tutorials.
  • Selling memberships for access to exclusive content or advice.
  • Using your blog as a content marketing tool for your business.

If you’re starting a blog as a way to market and boost your existing business, you probably won’t be selling ad space or memberships. But you can create and start offering exclusive digital products such as eBooks, guides, or online courses as a lead capturing tool in exchange for visitors’ email addresses.

That way, you’ll nudge them one step further down your sales funnel.

Want to start a blog on your own?

Creating your own personal blog takes a few steps. First, you need to decide on a name for your blog also called a domain name, and choose the best blogging platform. We recommend going with the self-hosted platform. There are few choices when it comes to self-hosted platforms but the most popular is WordPress.org.

Then you need to choose a web hosting service and for new bloggers, we strongly recommend Bluehost, a company that powers over 2 million websites worldwide. You will get a Free domain name when you sign up with them and if you don’t like their services, they offer a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Step One

Click on this link and you will go to the “Exclusive Offer” page reserved for our fans. Once you get there click on “Get Started Now”.

Step One


Step Two

step two

If this is your first hosting account ever, you should start with the basic plan, because you will need time to determine your needs and options. The basic plan has everything any beginner needs to set up a new blog. Consider other plans later when your blog takes off and your needs become greater.

Step Three

Your domain name will play a vital role in the future development of your blog and this is why it is important to take your time and figure out a good domain name. Once you’ve done that, enter the name in the “new domain” column and choose your Top-Level Domain.

Recommended tool:

Just type in the desired domain in this “new domain” box and BlueHost will show you whether it’s available or not. If not, it will provide you with a list of similar names for you to choose from.

Recommended reading: How to Start a Blog – Step by Step Guide

Conclusion

We hope that you’ve learned something important when it comes to the world of blogging. If you’ve managed to start a blog then your next step is to work on your blog content in order to keep your future readers satisfied and engaged. Feel free to check out our extensive list of blogging resources which will help you run and grow your new blog.

What-is-a-Blog infographic

Feel free to use this infographic on your website

<a href=”https://firstsiteguide.com/examples-of-blogs/”><img src=”https://firstsiteguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/What-is-a-Blog-infographic.jpg” alt=”What is a Blog infographic”></a><br /> What Is a Blog Infographic was created by <a href=”https://firstsiteguide.com/”>First Site Guide</a> team. This entry was posted in Blogging. Bookmark the permalink.

Additional Reading

Start Blog Book

START YOUR OWN BLOG

This guide is an introduction to mastering the art of blogging. It provides easy to follow steps to start, maintain, and grow your blog.

Read the guide

75 comments on “What is a Blog? – The Definition of Blog, Blogging, and Blogger”

  1. Notizie Fresche November 12, 2019 at 2:05 pm Very good blog! Do you have any helpful hints ffor aspiring writers?
    I’m planning to start my own siite soon but I’m a little lost on everything.
    Would you recommend starting with a free platform
    like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are soo many options out there that I’m completely confused ..
    Any ideas? Thanks a lot! Reply
    • Anya Skrba November 12, 2019 at 2:27 pm Hi Notizie, Self-hosted platforms allow you to run a blog using your own domain. Aside from following your domain registrar and web hosting company’s rules, you’re fully in charge of your blog and its contents. You have a number of choices when it comes to self-hosted systems (also called a Content Management System or CMS). The most popular is WordPress.org. Reply
  2. tyrese richardson November 5, 2019 at 7:52 pm Thanks for the content…it really helped me in school! Reply
  3. Aman October 27, 2019 at 5:20 am Nice Article, I love the way, you have written such a excellent post!! Perfect design!! Reply
  4. Salome Gongloe Gofan October 25, 2019 at 9:41 pm Thank you for this great article on what blog is and the entire process of blogging. Indeed this helped me a lot as I am a very new person to blogging. The article gave me a clear insight of the blog and it will help me in an online course where I am supposed to participate in a blog discussion. Eventually, I will think of establishing my own blog. Cheers Salome Reply
  5. James October 7, 2019 at 5:28 pm I think this is one of the most significant information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. I really enjoyed this post. Big fan, thank you! Reply
  6. Ifeanyi Akomas September 21, 2019 at 7:54 pm Very impressive! Reply
  7. Sarah August 21, 2019 at 11:04 am Hi! I have been wanting to start a blog. My roadblocks are being afraid of failure as I know I need to constantly create new content, but I guess my question is how often? (every day? once a week?) and I also need a niche. I would like a lifestyle blog that I can blog about being a military wife with a job and everything that is going on in my life etc, which can include almost everything. But I don’t want to seem too scattered at the same time. I would also want to create new content that is engaging! help! 🙂 Reply
    • Anya Skrba August 23, 2019 at 9:23 am Hey Sarah, I think it’s great that you want to start a blog! I like the idea of a lifestyle blog – we have a great guide that can lead you through the entire process of starting a lifestyle blog (with a few great examples of lifestyle blogs you can find inspiration from)! Or we can do it for you for free – if you’re interested in that write to use at hello@firstsiteguide.com Regarding your question about content creation – you need to know that this is going to be YOUR blog, which means YOU decide how much content you want to publish and what kind of content you’re going to create! Your first post should be about you – give your future readers a little introduction about yourself, your idea behind the blog, etc and later you can let the story leads you further. Experiment a bit, write about different things that you find to be valuable for sharing. In the beginning, you don’t have to have a content publishing schedule – whenever you feel like writing do it and press publish. Just feel free to practice – it’s your first time being a blogger, the world of blogging is a new thing for you and making mistakes is just fine! No blogger started without making mistakes and no blogger exists without making mistakes because you learn from them 🙂 Your blog is YOUR online space – you have total freedom on doing whatever you wish with it and from all of us here at FirstSiteGuide you have full support! 🙂 Goodluck with your blog Sarah, and if you need any help we’re always here for you! PS. see blogs of other military wives like The Frugal Navy Wife, The Military Wife and Mom, Army Wife 101, etc Reply
  8. D Hallaman August 6, 2019 at 5:22 pm This was a fantastic blog. A lot of very good information given, I had no idea what a blog was or how to start one. I will definitely use this information in the very near future. I have saved this link and will return in a couple of months, when I need to build my first blog. Thank you for the information. Reply
  9. Maddie W. July 24, 2019 at 5:49 am Hi,
    Thank you for the useful tips on how to start a blog. I especially agree with the sentence, “Every human being has its story to tell”. Blogging is a lot of work but what a great way to record your story and share with others. Thank you for sharing! Reply
  10. Joneson July 19, 2019 at 9:56 am Great post, blogging is hard. We run a travel blog and I think the most important thing we tell people is to travel with a purpose, Do not just wander around the world aimlessly. So many travel blogs do not really have a purpose or a niche. Niche is key and many miss out on that because they want to cover and do it all. Do not just start a blog because you think you will get rich quick and be able to travel the world. It takes a lot of work and lots of time. Reply
  11. Aneesha April 10, 2019 at 2:05 am it is a very useful article……now I’m gonna create a blog. Reply
  12. Gina April 5, 2019 at 4:01 pm Fantastic piece, well tailored…. You sort of cleared my phobias… Now I can give it a shot… I pray I don’t run out of contents!…a big kudos Reply
  13. Meenal March 29, 2019 at 6:07 pm Thank you so much. This article cleared my basic confusions about the blog. It is very helpful in learning basic concepts. Reply
  14. Emmanuel Obarhua March 25, 2019 at 2:33 pm This is the best article on the concept of blogging. I am writing on blogging and I wanted insight. That, I got. The scope of the article is valid. Well done. Will revisit soon. Reply
  15. Emanuel March 5, 2019 at 2:16 am Hello,
    Bravo! This is a very valuable article.
    I will now start my blog without any difficulty.
    Thank you… Reply
  16. Hannah Jackson February 11, 2019 at 11:03 am Thanks for sharing information about “Blog” & “Blogging”, can you please also guide me about Academic Blog Writing? Or what tips/rules should I follow to increase my viewers on my Academic blogs? I really appreciate it as you made blogging easier. Keep sharing such informative articles. Reply
  17. surazzShahil February 7, 2019 at 5:47 pm I think I should start blogging, thanks for your awesome post. Reply
  18. Daniel January 25, 2019 at 8:17 pm Thanks for these useful tips. Reply
  19. Ambaresh January 8, 2019 at 1:53 pm I want to start a blog .. thank you Reply
  20. Eliza Jennifer December 28, 2018 at 8:00 pm Nice post shared here. Good work and keep it up. Wishing you a very warm and blessed Happy New Year 2019. Reply
  21. Alan December 24, 2018 at 5:24 pm Clean and nice explanations, thank you! Reply
  22. Nagesh December 22, 2018 at 10:14 am I am planning to start Blog, Nice article it helps lot.
    Thank you Reply
  23. ankita May 10, 2018 at 4:38 am Thanks for your article. Really helpful. Reply
  24. Abdillah May 7, 2018 at 8:55 am Good article. Great to know. Reply
  25. Sarah May 4, 2018 at 10:39 am Very useful 👍 Reply
  26. Sumit kumar gupta April 29, 2018 at 6:42 am Thank you for sharing this great information. This information is very helpful for me. Reply
  27. Ayurvedic Products April 23, 2018 at 10:31 am Really helpful article for newbie and I’m too.. Your article is very productive to create a blog…All the steps are very important for the structure of a blog. Thank you for sharing this post. Now I will share this post… Reply
  28. swathi April 21, 2018 at 6:52 am Good article. All the points and steps are very clearly explained. It is very informative and interesting to read. Reply
  29. Ayushi April 19, 2018 at 9:27 am Nice article, very informative. Keep the good work going. Reply
  30. Kapil April 19, 2018 at 7:38 am Hi Admin.
    Great Article, Thanks For Sharing. Reply
  31. Sonika Srivastava April 18, 2018 at 1:21 pm Great Post! All the points and steps are very clearly explained. It is very informative and interesting to read. Reply
  32. Marcus Co April 18, 2018 at 10:57 am It was so fun reading your article and have provided much information needed for the industry. Reply
  33. komal April 15, 2018 at 5:15 am Iam using Blogspot as my professional platform. I love it, it is simple and easy to use. Plus benefit is Blogspot is owned by Google so basically, u have more chances to rank ur site in google. Thanks for the post mate. keep posting such kind of stuffs. Reply
  34. myasaintv April 14, 2018 at 5:09 am Thanks for this, it is informative for new ones. Reply
  35. komal April 13, 2018 at 6:03 am This is something great and perfectly described. These tips and way of explanation will surely help those newbies. Keep posting such kind of kinds of stuff, Thanks a lot mate! Reply
  36. Craig April 13, 2018 at 5:41 am Thanks for this, useful tips to get started Reply
  37. meonlife April 12, 2018 at 1:15 pm Hey Admin, your blog post is very useful and informative, especially for those who are new in the blogging field and don’t know much about blog writing. Reply
  38. Sheikh Abubakar April 12, 2018 at 8:06 am Waoo Coool Reply
  39. Jonathan April 11, 2018 at 2:16 pm So, blogging turns 18 this year :)) yeah, everyone wants to start blogging, until they start blogging 🙂 it’s not all fun&games, you need to keep a regular posting schedule, post quality (educational) content, engage with your readers… Reply
  40. Gordon April 11, 2018 at 9:38 am Your list of blogging ideas is practically inexhaustible! 😀 It will take me ages to go through all the blogs you mentioned there but I’m sure that after that I’ll know everything there is to take this exciting online journey called blogging 🙂 Reply
  41. Tom April 10, 2018 at 9:51 am Thanks to the people who blog, I found so many amazing people with similar interests like mine. There were so many situations they helped me get out of the limbo when I was stuck and I try whenever I can to do the same for those who a little push. That’s the true power of blogosphere if you ask me 🙂 Reply
  42. Janis Hawking April 9, 2018 at 2:49 pm If you ask me, if there were no blogs – there would be no Internet :))))
    ps. BTW, love that you listed a few blogging ideas here! Reply
  43. Blake April 9, 2018 at 2:41 pm Thanks for sharing these amazing tips! I was looking for a side-job idea for a while now and thanks to you my search is now ended 🙂 Reply
  44. Daniel April 9, 2018 at 2:26 pm This is great, I haven’t realized blogging has been around for that long. That Bradley’s video cleared up some things for me! Reply
  45. Mike D. April 9, 2018 at 2:21 pm Useful article for future bloggers! Reply
  46. Monika April 6, 2018 at 10:20 am Clear explaination 👍 Reply
  47. Big Bin Hire April 5, 2018 at 3:15 pm Bookmarking the blog for future reference. Reply
  48. Pingback: What A Blog Is About And What Do We Actually Mean By It
  49. Pingback: You Come To My Blog, So I’ll Show You How To Make One – VelardEugenee
  50. Pingback: Blogging – Social Media Networks
  51. Pingback: How to start a blog on WordPress – a step by step Guide
  52. mazegypt October 21, 2014 at 11:41 pm Great and useful post, Thanks for sharing Reply
  53. Pingback: Blogs versus Static Websites | marketblogplace
  54. Pingback: What is a blog | marketblogplace

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Search

How to Start a Blog

The Beginner’s Guide 2019Free Guide + eBook Learn Blogging Become a successful blogger Learn WordPress Understand the best practices BlogVideosGlossaryLearn WordPressWrite Blog ContentPromote Your BlogMake Money BloggingLearn BloggingBest Blog SitesWebsite buildersDomain RegistrarsHosting providersBlog Setup ServiceAll blog posts archive
Copyright © 2019   Free Help & Guides for Web Newbies Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsContactDisclosure: Our website receives compensation from the companies whose products we recommend and because of it, we are able to provide help with setting up your blog. We tested and used most of the web hosting sites and domain registrars recommended here.

Do you want to Start a Blog?
Don’t have time to do it yourself?
We can make it for you (Only $29.99)

Click here to see details and demos

The Occidental Observer

Thought control in the UK: Britain’s state-sponsored intimidation of Whites

August 11, 2016/24 Comments/in Featured Articles /by Francis Carr Begbie

The Muslim child rape gangs are back on the streets of Rotherham and bolder than ever. The Daily Express has revealed that carloads of Muslims are openly harassing girls, threatening their parents and moving around completely untroubled by the recent scandal. They have no fear of the cowed White population, much less the police or anyone else in authority.

But it would be wrong to think that the police are doing nothing about racial tension in the UK. This week a White man was convicted for making “grossly offensive” comments about Muslims on Facebook after the slaughter in Nice. This follows the jailing of another White man for tweeting his anger at a left-wing politician who demanded that more refugees be brought into Britain.

Despite the lip-service over concern about Muslim rape gangs, the authorities know their efforts must be focused on suppressing White rage. The Brexit referendum showed this is just underneath the surface, and with the discreet dispersal of thousands of Syrian refugees into poorer parts of the country at the end of June and July, what was needed was a not-too-subtle wave of intimidation. This has been achieved by way of a transparently bogus hate-crime campaign launched in the days after Brexit.

As if on some pre-arranged signal, there was, across the country, a flood of stories about how the Brexit vote had triggered a nationwide “hate crime” epidemic in which “hate crimes” went up 42% after the  vote. Why the victorious side would be stirred to such anger is not clear. Could it be that this scaremongering campaign was planned well in advance?

Within days of arriving in office, the new Home Secretary Amber Rudd unveiled a hate crime action plan” to take “robust and comprehensive steps” to tackle this sudden huge spike .  The central plank seems to be sharply increased sentences; the entire thrust made it clear that it is the White population that is being targeted.

Across the length and breadth of Britain the same pattern can be observed locally. Just as the Syrian “refugee families” are being imported into an area, there is a flurry of publicity about the police discovering a vague, usually online, hate crime epidemic. This seems to run hand in hand with a policy of concealing genuine crimes by the invaders.

In Newcastle-upon-Tyne the police managed to cover up the rape of a 14-year-old girl by a gang of Syrians — despite the fact that for months the local police, via the media, had been encouraging people to report hate crime.

Another good example is Swansea in South Wales. The police, together with the local media, concealed the identity of one Syrian rapist until he was convicted long after the event. After Brexit and, just as another influx of Syrian refugees was to be shipped in, the police announced that they wanted people to step up their hate crime reporting. Understandably many locals have been driven beyond endurance at their inability to express their anger politically.

It was in 2012, not long after the Syrian war started, that the people of Swansea were somewhat baffled to learn their home town had been declared a sanctuary city for war refugees. From 2014 Swansea was bombarded with propaganda from the BBC and other outlets in which bewildered locals discovered for the first time that they had a long history of taking in migrants. In an unemployment black spot like Swansea there are few jobs, but there seems plenty in the refugee industry with vacancies for “refugee integration officers.” There is also a huge shortage of housing stock, but the local authority can still make homes available for Syrian refugees.  Rules were changed by council officers so that this move did not require political ratification.

In Sidcup, in south-east London, residents staged a demonstration after discovering that, without any warning, a refugee center was being imposed on their neighbourhood.  They were perfectly respectable people yet they suffered a co-ordinated demonization attack by the media and police working in tandem, who said they were countering “hate.” For the reasonable objections of such patently decent residents to be misrepresented in this way must be extremely intimidating.

A close reading of the secretary’s hate crime plan reveals one very striking detail — the close involvement of the Jewish private security organization, the Community Security Trust, in drawing it up. The organisation even boasts about its role on its website.

The CST is the source for one unsourced anecdote after another trotted out as evidence of a deluge of anti-Semitic “hate crimes.” We are told that a Jewish man was knocked to the ground by someone making the “Heil Hitler” salute. Jewish girls were followed home and called “Jewish bitches” by other schoolgirls. That is it — pure anecdote with no back up evidence at all.

There are other interesting references in the government’s Action Against Hate plan which seem only vaguely relevant to a national epidemic of hate crime, including making sure that the police are well-briefed on the holocaust:

[Government] will work with partners to produce and distribute an updated version of the Police Officer’s Guide to the Holocaust to be extended for all criminal justice professionals.

To help the police and others better tackle antisemitic and other forms of hate crime, we will work with the police to create a database of symbols, slogans and flags that may be illegal because the organisations that use them are proscribed or incite hatred. DCLG will lead on the creation of this database, and it will be shared with partners though the NPCC. This is one of the recommendations made by the All-Party Parliamentary Group against Antisemitism following its inquiry (February 2015) into the impact of the Gaza conflict on UK Jewish communities.

Furthermore, the National Holocaust Centre and Museum and the Anne Frank Trust are to be entrusted with going into schools “taking the poignant messages of Anne’s life and diary to help students understand the damage caused by prejudice and hatred.”

With regards to Muslims, the body the government is working with is the notorious CST subsidiary Tell MAMA, the full story of which has appeared in TOO. In 2013 in the wake of the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby, this body was exposed for talking up “a cycle of violence against Muslims” when in fact it was talking about internet comments.

After having its shoddy evidence gathering exposed, government funding was removed from TellMama and the group was then taken over by the CST. But now taxpayer funding has been restored by the backdoor via the deep taxpayer-funded pockets of its parent body which is flush with cash after being handed more than £13 million of government cash.

The more you look at the hate-crime epidemic the murkier it gets. These incidents are often self-reported online entries which are not subjected to any investigation or verification.

Much of the hate crime statistics in Britain are compiled via the True Vision online portal. The online form mentions five different types of “hate incident” which can be reported; race is only one of these.  The others have to do with homosexuality, transgender, religion and disability.  So why has no breakdown of the alleged thousands of new hate crime offences been published? How many have been verified?  How many are discounted? It is hard to think of an approach more guaranteed to open the door to a flood of frivolous or bogus complaints.

The definition of what is a hate crime is also very vague and seems to be based on “feelings” and not facts. As examples, the Action Against Hate plan lists a number of case histories with no information as to whether they were verified, prosecuted or proven in any way. Significantly all these anecdotes were provided by the Jewish vigilante organisation, the CST — a good example of the sway this outfit has in central government.In fact, this extremely vague definition of hate crime is deliberate in that it keeps people unsure of where they stand online or off and therefore unwilling to voice their complaints. The goal here is not to jail people but to suppress dissent by intimidation.

The line separating the legal from the illegal is sometimes baffling. Nottinghamshire police have been instructed to record incidents of wolf-whistling as hate crimes.  What does the police’s own guidance say? The police’s own ‘Hate Crime Operational Guidance’ stresses that it is the — alleged — victim’s perception that is the deciding factor in whether someone is to be a victim of a hate crime or not. The definition of “hate crime” has been extended seems to include any unpleasant encounter, verbal or otherwise. No other evidence is required. A complainant just needs to feel that something that happened is rooted in “hate” and the police are obliged to record it as such.

Evidence of …  hostility is not required for an incident or crime to be recorded as a hate crime or hate incident. … The perception of the victim, or any other person, is the defining factor. …  The victim does not have to justify or provide evidence of their belief, and police officers or staff should not directly challenge this perception.

Reading the police guidelines takes you into an even more bizarre world of “secondary victimisation” which is obviously meant to lean on the police themselves.

[Secondary victimisation] is a term used to describe secondary harm because of insensitive or abusive treatment from those who should be supporting them, for example, when they feel indifference or rejection from the police when reporting a crime or incident. … Secondary victimisation is based on victim perception, rather than what actually happens.  It is immaterial whether it is reasonable or not for the victim to feel that way.

Police are told that operational success is not based on reducing hate crime. In fact, the more such “crimes” occur, the better. As the Operational Guidance states on pages 11.3.1,

Targets that see success as reducing hate crime are not appropriate as they can be discouraging to staff, and are unlikely to motivate managers to promote positive recording or to increase the opportunity for victims to report through third party reporting structures.

Increases in hate crime are to be put down to an improvement in policing. In other words, police are incentivised to ramp up the hate crime figures as much as possible.

An area that receives an 8% rise in recorded hate crime in a period when the (national figure) shows a stable total is likely to be attributable to positive policing and partnership responses.

Got that? A rise in hate crime is a sign that the police are doing their job properly. Hate crime in Britain today is a mini-industry which is highly incentivized and features many private third party organisations with a financial interest in ramping up scares.

Police and media collaboration in the covering up of refugee crime by police is a continent-wide scandal. The concealment of mass sex assaults in Cologne took days to come out, and in Sweden it has emerged that sex attacks on White girls at music festivals have been taking place since 2014. The lack of emphasis on the origins of the Norwegian-of-Somali-origin killer of an American tourist in London seems to be part of a pattern.

Flush with its millions of pounds of government money, the CST was this week able to announce increased patrols around Jewish schools and centers because of the recent Jihadist attacks. Sadly that extra security is not an option for the White communities, like Rotherham, reeling from the continuing activities of Muslim child rape gangs on one hand, and a state determined to stifle and crush any dissent, on the other.FacebookTwitterWhatsAppEmailPrintFriendlyShare

Share this entry

24 replies

Comments are closed.

TOQ Live: Guillaume Durocher, Kevin MacDonald & James Edwards

Get Posts by Email

Enter Best email address to subscribe to this blog and receive new posts by email.

Email Address

TOQLive: James Edwards hosts Kevin MacDonald: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition

Watch TOO Video Picks

DONATE

DONATE TO TOO

Follow us on Facebook

Topics

Topics

Authors

Monthly Archives

RECENT TRANSLATIONS

All | Czech | Finnish | French | German | Greek | Italian | Polish | Portuguese | Russian | Spanish | Swedish

Blogroll

NEW: Individualism and the Western Liberal TraditionCulture of CritiqueSeparation and Its DiscontentsA People That Shall Dwell Alone © 2018 The Occidental Observer –

By continuing to browse the site, you are legally agreeing to our use of cookies and general site statistics plugins.CloseLearn more

The case for amnesty: why it’s time to offer citizenship to illegal immigrants Posted November 8th 2019

There is an unspoken truth about British life: we have two classes of citizen. The first are those born or formally settled here, who have all the rights and protections of the law. Then there are perhaps a million others who may have lived here with their families for years but without the proper documents. They can be our neighbours, work in our shops, contribute to our economy — yet they do not have the same basic protections and are far more vulnerable to exploitation. These are the so-called illegal immigrants, and it is past time to offer them amnesty.

Britain has become the most successful melting pot in Europe, absorbing 2.5 million people over this decade without the far-right backlash seen in much of the continent. A recent Pew study showed that Brits are more likely than any other Europeans to say that migrants make the country -stronger. This is why the Windrush scandal was so damaging to the Tories. To deport people who have been living here peacefully for years because they did not have documentation was not just inhumane but fundamentally un-British. The same principle applies to a great many people who could be considered illegal migrants.

Consider the case of Ben James, Nigerian by birth, who was sent to school in London and then, at the age of 14, abandoned by his family. He managed to build a career and, as a successful commodities broker in his twenties, approached the Home Office in order to regularise his status. He was asked to leave Britain but fought for the right to stay, eventually winning. His case was taken up by The Spectator in 2001 when we first made the case for an amnesty for people in his situation. The editor, then, was Boris Johnson.

There is no sign that the Prime Minister has changed his mind about the need for an amnesty since he embarked on his political career. On the contrary, he made the case for this when he was Mayor of London and returned to this theme during the later stages of the Leave campaign. The dilemma he now faces is easy to understand. As this magazine argued in a cover article earlier this year, he needs to win over Brexit party voters, so he may be tempted to sound tough on migration  and quietly bury his support for an amnesty. But the case is there to be made.

The main objection is that people who broke the law in coming here ought not to be rewarded. But this position overlooks the complexities of modern migration patterns and the number of people affected. Ben James, for example, was a child when he was brought here. Other ‘illegals’ have had families and found jobs; they pay taxes. David Wood, a former head of immigration enforcement at the Home Office, has estimated that there are now 1.2 million undocumented migrants in the UK — more than the population of Birmingham. For the UK government to be theoretically committed to their expulsion is an absurdity.

An amnesty would not increase the actual population of Britain (as opposed to the official population): these people are living here anyway. What it would do is bring them out of the black economy, make it more likely that they will pay tax, and give them a greater incentive to make a contribution to civic life.

There is now ample evidence to show that amnesties strengthen society. Ronald Reagan offered an amnesty to illegal immigrants in 1986, and studies show that they were then far better able to integrate into society: their language skills increased, and their wages rose by up to 25 per cent as they were able to escape the unregulated, exploitation-ridden shadow economy. A 2005 amnesty in Spain raised an extra €4,000 of tax revenue for every naturalised citizen.

An amnesty would not mean that we stop policing the borders. A commonsense line can be drawn between those who have lived here for several years, and those who have not put down roots, who can be removed in a way that deters illegal immigration. The pressure group Migration Watch UK has argued that amnesties encourage more illegal immigration — but any amnesty could require a qualification period of ten years’ residency. That is unlikely to offer much temptation. The problem is that for years UK authorities have been pursuing those who are living and working peacefully, rather than focusing on criminals and smuggling gangs. Much of this stems from a failure of politicians to talk about this rationally.

The Prime Minister is accused by his enemies of being a cynic who bends his principles to the prevailing wind. But he made the unpopular case for an amnesty as London Mayor, did not resile from it as Foreign Secretary and has made supportive noises since moving into 10 Downing Street. It would not be so radical given that, in practice, there are already routes to citizenship for many illegal migrants. The next step should be to formalise this, on generous yet practical terms, and put it in the 2019 Tory manifesto.

This would be a bold expression of the Prime Minister’s personal brand of liberal Conservatism, and of the version of Brexit he articulated in the Leave campaign. An amnesty would carry political risk, but so does any worthwhile reform. He is already persuaded of the principle. We now need the policy. The Spectator

Tom Watson’s Exit Proves The Rebels Are The Masters Of This ElectionYahoo/Inbox Posted November 7th 2019

Paul Waugh <info@mail.huffpost.com>To:robert.cook21@btinternet.com6 Nov at 23:27

By Paul Waugh, HuffPost UK. Wednesday November 6   📨Enjoying The Waugh Zone? Share the sign-up. Thanks for reading!   Elementary, Mr Watson?In today’s National Executive Committee meeting, Tom Watson wanted to know why his West Midlands colleague Roger Godsiff was being axed as a Labour candidate. When he was told it was because Godsiff had rebelled four times on Brexit earlier this year, Watson couldn’t resist a wry observation. “Jeremy rebelled 500 times against this party, but was always readopted by the NEC as a candidate,” he said.‌
Those present, both his enemies and his allies, thought it was just ‘Tom being Tom’, tweaking the tail of the leader’s record. Little did any of them know that in fact it was the deputy leader’s last hurrah, as deputy leader and member of the NEC and shadow cabinet.‌
Watson’s departure was such a tightly-kept secret that even some of his closest friends were shocked at the news. Despite rumours that other senior ‘moderates’ would follow him, so far none have and his exit is seen as a personal decision, albeit one with huge symbolism. It’s worth remembering that a third of the parliamentary party joined his Future Britain Group earlier this year to stop centrists fleeing to the short-lived Independent Group.‌
Watson was seen as increasingly semi-detached from both the shadow cabinet and the NEC, often not turning up to either. Both his importance and his impotence were underlined in dramatic fashion when Momentum’s Jon Lansman tried to axe his role on the eve of the party conference in September. ‌
Lansman came within a whisker of getting his way (but for a couple of NEC members turning up late, it would have worked). Gordon Brown was so furious that he rang Jeremy Corbyn to ask him what the hell was going on. Corbyn was equally irate at the ‘student politics’ that could ruin his pre-election conference. ‌
Yet Watson could see the writing was on the wall, with Diane Abbott and Rebecca Long-Bailey backing Lansman. An ominous campaign to install Corbyn ally Laura Pidcock as a new deputy leader was also unleashed. With Watson now staying in post until December 12, he’s already ensured one big leadership election immediately after the election.‌
His surprise move, which had the dubious honour of distracting from Boris Johnson’s election launch, meant that Wednesday was bookended by two big resignations. When Welsh secretary Alun Cairns quit amid claims of lying about a rape trial, it was not exactly the perfect overture for the PM’s big speech on the steps of No.10.‌
Johnson looked typically unkempt for his big announcement, his hair as messy as usual, his shirt unstuffed, as he proceeded to deliver what sounded more like an after dinner speech than an address to the nation. As ever, it was all carefully scripted to sound unscripted, particularly the line about him “wanting to chew my own tie in frustration” that parliament won’t pass his Brexit deal.‌
And that theme of a parliament blocking ‘the will of the people’ will be rammed home relentlessly over the next five weeks, as well as claims Corbyn’s cosying to Russia, some dog whistling on immigration and crime, plus big dollops of cash for ‘schools-n-hospitals’ (a phrase the Tories tried unsuccessfully to ridicule Tony Blair with).‌
In this evening’s rally in the Birmingham, Johnson’s key message was “Let’s make 2020 about the people of this country and not its politicians”. It was Trump-like in its dismissal of MPs as a vehicle for change, but never forget that Trump got elected by using precisely that kind of narrative. As Trump attacks Washington, so Johnson attacks Westminster.‌
But it was obvious from the PM’s rally speech that her fears being out-Trumped by Nigel Farage most of all. The Brexit Party leader again said today Johnson’s deal is ‘just not Brexit’. He added he would not have a manifesto and instead have a ‘contract with the people’. “Let others call theirs manifestos, nobody will believe a word they say.”‌
Johnson has a habit of not naming Farage, but no one could miss his jibe at his rival when he said the Brexit Party “remind me a bit of candle-sellers at the dawn of the age of the electric light bulb..or the makers of typewriters on beholding their first laptop computer…they have a terrible sense that they are about to lose their market”. All very subtle, but a bit too clever by half compared to Farage’s full-on rhetoric? Party chairman James Cleverly raised the spectre of a no-deal Brexit again today, perhaps in a sign that the Brexit Party threat is all too real.‌
With a blocked nose and sore throat, Johnson sounded under the weather tonight. And if he catches a political cold in this winter election, it may well be down to Farage. The former UKIP leader is a rebel’s rebel, so far shrugging off all the criticism of him from Tory Brexiteers who themselves rebelled mercilessly against Theresa May. Johnson quit her cabinet to twice vote against her deal, but he’s finding that pragmatism and compromise can be tough sells to true be-Leavers.‌
Corbyn too was of course a serial rebel against his party, as Watson pointed out in that NEC meeting today. The Labour leader’s admirers will say he was a rebel with a clause (IV to be precise). He and his likeminded colleagues now have an unchallenged grip on their party that makes Blair looks like a woolly liberal. ‌
And more broadly, this general election is now a contest between rebels of various stripes. Everyone wants to be the ‘change candidate’ and for once that hackneyed Blairite phrase is true: the status quo really isn’t an option.   Quote Of The Day“I hope the horseradish plants I gave you thrive”‌
Jeremy Corbyn wishes Tom Watson well on his political retirement   Wednesday Cheat SheetBoris Johnson formally told the Queen that the general election had started. ‌
Welsh Secretary Alun Cairns resigned after being accused of “brazenly lying” about his knowledge of an allegation that a Tory candidate had sabotaged a rape trial.‌
John Bercow has revealed he sees Brexit as the UK’s “biggest foreign policy mistake” in the post-war era. ‌
A senior police officer told candidates to walk in pairs and keep mobile phones charged in  winter election safety guidance.‌
The trio of former MPs were axed as Labour candidates for the general election. Chris Williamson, Stephen Hepburn and Roger Godsiff were all dumped by the party’s ruling National Executive Committee. Williamson announced he would stand as an independent. Keith Vaz’s fate will be decided by a special NEC panel.‌
Nigel Farage said he had approved the design for 27 million leaflets to go out in the campaign. “We will be giving this country the facts on Boris’ EU treaty, Labour’s Brexit betrayal and providing a real clean break option for the voters.”‌
The Green Party launched their campaign with a call for £100bn a year to be spent on tackling the climate emergency.   What I’m ReadingTom Watson’s Career Path Through Labour – Prospect Magazine   Got A Tip?Send tips, stories, quotes, pics, plugs or gossip to waugh.zone@huffpost.com.    🔊 Subscribe To Commons PeopleEach week, the HuffPost UK Politics team unpack the biggest stories from Westminster and beyond. Search for Commons People wherever you listen to podcasts and subscribe.   Was the Waugh Zone forwarded to you? Subscribe here.
©2019 Verizon Media.‌
HuffPost is now a part of Verizon. On 25 May 2018 we introduced a new Privacy Policy which explains how your data is used and shared.‌
HuffPost UKMidCity Place, 71 High HolbornLondonWC1V 6EA‌
You’re receiving this email because you subscribed to updates from HuffPost UK. ‌

Follow www.rt.com

The Islamic Zealots Who Seized U.S. Embassy 40 Years Ago Today Weren’t ‘Students’

by A.J. Caschetta
The National Review
November 4, 2019

     

Originally published under the title “The Iranian Hostage-Takers in 1979 Were Not ‘Students’.”

The Islamist operatives recruited to seize the U.S. embassy in Iran in 1979 weren’t exactly screened for valid student IDs.

Listen carefully to the inevitable flood of 40th-anniversary retrospectives on the November 4, 1979, takeover of the U.S. embassy in Iran, and you’ll hear an unusual choice of words to describe the hostage-takers. From the very first moment of the hostage crisis, Walter Cronkite and most other American journalists referred to the men who climbed walls, faced down Marine guards, broke into buildings, seized diplomats, and held them for 444 days as “students,” uncritically adopting the moniker used by both the hostage-takers themselves and Iran’s new revolutionary regime, which was anxious to avoid U.S. retaliation.

When the embassy was stormed and briefly occupied on Valentine’s Day 1979, it was an amateurish affair, quickly broken up by the provisional revolutionary government. But the November 4 takeover was a far more professional job. The attackers disguised their intentions with banners proclaiming “We do not wish to harm you. We just want to set in.”

The Great Replacement for Dummies (Journalists from The Independent, the New York Times, Le Monde,… )

by Ken HagdalJuly 29, 2019 Share3 Posted here November 3rd 2019

Over the last few months, several articles have been published in legacy media on the “Great Replacement“, a term coined by French writer Renaud Camus, according to whom European populations are bound to become a minority in their own country. The main underlying notions here are that this is a dynamic, ongoing process sustained by various factors, and that it takes place on a global level. Those taking issue with it often call it a theory and tend to imply that none of it is true. We will stick to the situation in Europe from now on as it’s what concerns this writer personally.

First, let’s look at two articles published by legacy media.

For starters, the New York Times (1) describes it as “bonkers”, along with “racist” and “sexist” right from the get-go. The sexist part being somehow linked to video games and comic books. Over the 1000 words of his article, the author provides no facts on Europe, where Renaud Camus resides, only a study on US demographics that does actually confirm the trend. Nor does .he question the influence of democracy-superseding forces said to be at play. The reader is however treated to such hard-hitting analyses as “It has found its greatest purchase among a certain type of basement-dwelling incel edgelord, to whom it offers both an explanation for self-pitying personal circumstances and a set of convenient antagonists”.

In The Independent, another article (2) leads the reader to think they’re in for a researched and point-by-point analysis through the title “how to defeat the cretinous ‘great replacement’ theory…”. Instead, its argumentation eschews any criticism of Renaud Camus’s premise to the point that this time there’s not a single figure on demographic trends. The defeat of the so-called theory instead hinges on abstract recommendations, themselves leaning on the authors’ unsubstantiated opinions. (ex: “To oppose this movement of fear and shame, we must build an internationalist movement of liberation with equality at its heart. The only response to the hallucinatory realm of white rage is a return to reality.”)

Ironically, the two authors unwittingly vindicate Renaud Camus’s view that those who support globalization have no qualms about to dissolving native European’s distinct identity. According to them, it’s no more than a figment of Europeans’ imagination (“Tarrant and others who espouse his vicious and deadly ideology seek to retrench their own invented identity”). It also checks the box of the push for unfettered immigration that local populations should have no say about (“We can brook no compromise with the ideology of hard borders”)

Before digging deeper into these journalists’ mindset, a few relevant facts about the claim of European natives becoming a minority in their own country. This is already the case in a growing number of cities:

  • White Britons are now a minority in 4 towns and cities (Express.co.uk) (3)
  • Ethnic Dutch a minority in big cities, so how do they integrate? – (DutchNews.nl) (4)
  • Frankfurt Becomes First German City Where Natives Are Minority (5)
  • “With Malmo poised to become Sweden’s first minority-majority city in the next few years” (6)
  • “The ethnic and religious compositions of Nordic populations have been projected by Eurostat  (Lanzieri,  2011),  the  Pew  Research  Center  (2015),  and  Statistics  Denmark  (2015).  These studies are updated and complemented in this paper.  Lanzieri’s consideration of the native population is supplemented by taking into account assimilation via marriages between natives and foreign-background persons (…). The projected demographic changes are similar in the four Nordic countries.  The  development  is  fastest  in  Sweden;  in  2065,  the  share  of  the  native  population  is  to  decrease  to  49%.” (7)
  • International migration changed large West European cities dramatically. In only two generations ’ time, their ethnic make-up is turned upside down. Cities like Amsterdam and Brussels now are majority-minority cities: the old majority group became a minority.” (Sociology Research) (8)
  • In the département of Seine-Saint-Denis (population of 1.5 million), 56.7% of young under 18 are or foreign origin including 38% of African origin. (9)

That is already a lot afoot for something that will never take place.

Other articles made some more effort in trying to build their case, but as with most disconnects between legacy media’s representation of reality and the real deal, the problem lies in what they omit rather than what they say.

Take Liberation’s Laurent Joffrin’s recent op-ed (10). He compares the fertility rates of native and Muslim women, and while acknowledging that the latter is higher than the former, he rightly concludes the difference will not account for anything qualifying as replacement anytime soon. He however simply considers the impact of Muslim populations already present in France. What grossly underestimates the demographic changes at play is that not all non-natives are Muslim (in 2025, there will be about twice as many Christians in Africa as the current total EU population), nor does factor in newcomers. Migration flow to France – about 100K people a year – is routinely deemed to be low by advocates of the status quo. What about the long term consequences?

Over a 50 years period, after which natives under 30 today will still statistically be alive, this would bring five million non-natives in the country. Still no replacement yet. With a fertility rate of 3, one has to add 7.5 million, or 12.5 million in total. For the first generation only, that is. Fertility rates tending to drop once settled in Europe, let’s set it to 2 for the next generation. This second-generation will comprise those arriving in the first 25 years, ie 3.75M. That’s 7.5 more millions. We’re at 20 million after 50 years, the time when the 3rd generation will begin to appear. Immigrants being generally young they will all be alive at this time. One also has to point out that this is a very conservative estimate as it doesn’t take into account that many immigrants arrive on their own and are entitled to bring their partner into Europe later on. So in reality, one would have to multiply the initial influx by a factor between 1 and 2. So, as the stern laws of arithmetic have it, a paltry 100K a year means at least 20 million over a 50 years’ period. How about the next iteration?

Another argument put forward by Laurent Joffrin is that the word replacement is inaccurate and of ill-faith. He states that for there to be replacement, non-natives should expel natives from the country. History teaches us otherwise if one looks to what happened to Native Americans. Before the 16th century, they made up 100% of the population. Nowadays, less than 2% and none of them were made to leave their country. Besides deaths from imported diseases and massacres, factors having contributed to their population’s decline to current levels include the removal of children for them to be placed in non-native foster families, assimilation, and inter-ethnic marriages. As a matter of course, one of the reasons they may still be existing as distinct ethnic groups five centuries after the first waves of mass migration is they were granted the right to live in reservations, as opposed to the forced, so-called diversity instated in non-Eastern Europe.

This alternate way of replacing native populations through dissolution is underlaid in a recent and publicly-funded study that scrutinized the ethnicity of whites’ romantic partners in the US (11). The paper concludes: “Overall, our results enhance the understanding of how exposure to racial diversity can reduce the degree of assortativity by race in dating and marriage”. The rationale given is that it’s for the good of society; or social harmony as the researchers put it.

Finally, we find a reputed newspaper acknowledging the weight of facts and confirming the trend on a global level.:

  • “Non-whites will be majority in US and Europe by 2050” (The Guardian) (12)

The Guardian, too, ensures his readers that the ongoing process is for the best. A mindset one also finds in an interview (13) with the Dalai Lama who claimed Europe should be for Europeans, much to the journalist’s dismay. When doubling down, the interviewer, a non-native like the voice of rationalization (Yasmin Alibhai-Brown) in the Guardian article, pressed him to elaborate on what the big deal was about European becoming a minority in their own continent.

In summary, any native European expressing positive views of the “Great Replacement” is guilty of spreading a dubious, “racist” “theory” according to “Hate Speech” experts. This judgment has already been used to justify banning from social media, while statistics in support of this process abound and journalists doing actual legwork are allowed to write about it freely.

These self-appointed experts’ behaviour is known as “gaslighting” in psychology:

Gaslighting is a tactic in which a person or entity, in order to gain more power, makes a victim question their reality. It works much better than you may think. Anyone is susceptible to gaslighting, and it is a common technique of abusers, dictators, narcissists, and cult leaders. (Psychology Today)

Readers interested in the field will also be struck by the similarities with the different stages of grieving found throughout journalistic rebuttals. Anger with the Independent/New York Times journalists. Denial for the Le Monde Editor in chief. Bargaining and acceptance for The Guardian and the Dalai lama interviewer. The only thing that lacks is depression. A state of mind that would occur if they had sufficient self-awareness to realize how often they transgress their alleged high morale. Like with their sudden uneasy silence when Native Europeans are raped (14), decapitated (15), beaten up (16) by non-natives, racially discriminated in employment  Aspects of the real world their psyche would rather not dwell too much on.

And what better way to preserve inner peace than by scrubbing those of us who broach these facts by calling is all the unsavoury names in the book? Without this cognitive dissonance, the Guardian article would pull them into the throes of introspection, as they would realize that the colonization of the past Yasmin Alibhai-Brown rails against has more similarities than not to her vision for Europe. They would have to call her out on it. Not going to happen. They may even have faint recollections of the decolonization movements in Asia and Africa. Maybe that of Algeria, which ended with the flight for their life of eight hundred thousand souls of European descent, causing them to leave all their belongings behind. Given Algeria’s population at the time, that would amount to four million non-natives having to flee the country if such events occurred in today’s France. Would it draw as little commentary? Why was that part of a “struggle for independence” and not racism/fascism? How about Gandhi? By their standards, wasn’t he an Asian Supremacist? And we’re the scum of the earth for pointing out the negative impact of globalization in Europe. Some animals are more equal than others.

Reality checks rarely are pleasant. Fighting them can be an option provided problems are of such nature that they wind up going away by themselves. This is the opposite of what’s ahead of us here, and the harder globalization advocates dig their heels in, the more mentally exhausting it will be for them as inconvenient facts will keep piling up.

The next series of posts will help make the transition smoother for them, as they’ll be able to learn about the unconscious blinders that prevent them from seeing the world as it really is. Those of us on the receiving end of their ill-placed ire will for their part get clues to how to handle them in an effective and dispassionate way. So no matter where you stand, stay tuned.

(1): https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/20/opinion/new-zealand-great-replacement.html

This page is not properly edited and is fairly random, just stuff we find interesting.

“We’re all screwed”

Big Tech Spends Big Money to Fix Big Trouble Beyond Shares Plummet After Sizzling Performance in Q3 Lawyer: The President Should Be Allowed to Kill a Guy Happy Halloween: “We’re All Screwed”
Big Tech Spends Big Money to Fix Big Trouble Big tech is spending record amounts of money on lobbying Washington, as lawmakers suddenly realise the entire internet is controlled by four guys. Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft jacked up their spending in the first nine months of 2019, according to disclosures filed with the federal government. (And the checks were just signed to “anyone but Elizabeth Warren.”) Reportedly, Amazon spent $12.4 million, representing a 16% increase from 2018, begging Congress to “just go away for a few more years so we can really get this monopoly going, please.” Unsurprisingly, the company which is owned by the richest man in the world (Jedd Berbos, I think?) spent more money than any company lobbying Washington this year, with Facebook coming in a close second. Mark Zuckerberg’s Drunk Photo Aggregator increased spending by 25% this year, as part of an ongoing campaign to “make everything go back to the way it used to be, so Mark doesn’t have to go outside anymore.” Meanwhile, Microsoft and Apple (who are substantially less intimidating without their cutthroat founders at the helm) boosted spending on greasy dudes in Washington by 9% and 8% respectively. A history of lobbying: One of the earliest instances of lobbying in the U.S. involved gunmaker Samuel Colt who paid lobbyists to pass out pistols as gifts to lawmakers and to one member’s 12-year-old son. (Which is totally fine because kids tended not to survive until adulthood in those days anyway.) For its part, Google actually spent less on lobbying Washington. After a change in leadership earlier this year, the company that knows exactly what porn you like fired a whole bunch of its lobbyists and is reportedly pivoting its campaigning strategy to more community-based programs. (Like pop-up kiosks where consumers could get personalised guidance on how not to have their privacy violated by Google.) What’s got Big Tech Reaching for Its Big Wallet? The increase in spending coincides with the government suddenly realising that these companies exist and control almost 80% of the internet. The FTC has opened a probe into Amazon’s market power. The House Judiciary Committee is conducting a broad antitrust investigation into Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and Google. Meanwhile, Facebook is facing antitrust investigations from the FTC, the Justice Department, almost every state attorney general in the country, and me and a couple of mom’s who do detective work out of the back of a Vietnamese nail salon in our spare time. This is probably why one of the Mark Zuckerberg clones seems to have taken up residence in Washington for the time being, making three official appearances on the Hill in just five weeks. “I’m not sure whether Mr. Zuckerberg has bought an apartment here yet or not, but he is certainly spending much, much more time and not just him,” Rep. Bill Huizenga (R., Mich.) told the Wall Street Journal. “They were behind the curve in getting out talking to policy makers.” Beyond Shares Plummet After Sizzling Performance in Q3 Shares of frankenburger flipper Beyond Meat (BYND) plunged 20% today, despite an earnings report any crazed Transylvanian scientist would be proud of.  The close-your-eyes-and-pretend-its-meat producer topped analysts’ expectations this quarter, reporting earnings of 6 cents on revenue of $92 million and exceeding forecasts of 3 cents on revenue of $82.2 million. Sales of not-sausage and what-beef grew in restaurants and stores across the USA, as consumers happily reported no extra eyes or fingers growing on their person after consumption. The company also raised its 2019 outlook for revenue to a range of $265 million to $275 million, up from a prior forecast of more than $240 million. Not a bad Q3 for a bunch of folks selling bleeding yellow-pea protein. So why the stock plunge?
The only acceptable toppings for a burger are cheese, pickle, onion, and mayo. Anything else and you’re just eating a salad. With the stock’s lockout period coming to an end today, 75% to 80% of Beyond’s shares will be eligible for trading on the stock market. This is the first day insiders who snapped up pre-IPO shares can sell their stock. So predictably, investors, anticipating a wave of insider selling, started a wave of outsider selling, plunging the stock 20% to about $85. The folks over on Wall Street are still bullish on the stock, with many analysts predicting Beyond will recover from this wobble as long as company insiders don’t sell all their stock at once.   “Much depends on the amount of selling pressure over the next few days,” said J.P. Morgan’s Ken Goldman in a note to clients. “Putting the lockup expiry in the past ultimately should incent some investors to start buying the stock again, though the shares could fade lower beforehand.” Beyond Meat CEO Ethan Brown, who’s definitely wondered if his veggie burgers would taste better if they could feel pain as well as bleed, said he’s not touching his stock but it’s up to his employees if they want to sell or not. “For employees its certainty around their person circumstances that they have, if they just need liquidity,” said Brown on CNBC’s terribly named Squawk Box. “I think the early investors its the investor mandate, what does their firm require them to do?” Shares of Beyond Meat (BYND) are down 65% from a record high of $239.71 in July. But despite this morning’s sell-off, shares are still up 230% since its IPO in May. Lawyer: The President Should Be Allowed to Kill a Guy Attorneys representing President Trump say he should be able to kill a guy in broad daylight and get away with it, according to a new report by the Wall Street Journal. (He hasn’t. But the argument is, if he did, it would be fine. Don’t worry about it.) According to court documents and filings made by Trump’s own legal team, the president’s attorneys have repeatedly fought to grant the president immunity from “civil lawsuits, judicial orders, criminal investigations [and] congressional probes.”  Last week, President Trump’s personal attorney and casual fan of murder William Consovoy argued before a New York federal court that a sitting president cannot be investigated for any crime while in office. The judge then asked if that included shooting someone on Fifth Avenue, referencing a joke the president made on the campaign trail that he “could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and wouldn’t lose any voters, okay?” “That’s correct,” said Consovoy, who probably should have thought about that one a little longer. New York Mayor and definitely not the next president Bill de Blasio told reporters that they probably would go ahead and arrest President Trump if he shot somebody on Fifth Ave. (Again. This is all hypothetical. As far as I know, President Trump has not gone on a shooting spree outside the Met and this is all a fun exercise in what-ifs.) “If anybody shoots someone, they get arrested,” told reporters. “I don’t care if they’re the President of the United States or anybody else. If you shoot someone, you should get arrested, and we would arrest him.” There is some precedent for U.S. presidents fighting for immunity and exceptional privileges in the courts. Nixon, Clinton, and Bush Jr. all fought numerous legal battles to protect their interests while serving as president, with varying degrees of success.

Jump to navigation

Subscriber Callout

Current Issue
November/December 2019 Sign inSubscribe

SearchSign inSubscribe

The Demolition of U.S. Diplomacy

Not Since Joe McCarthy Has the State Department Suffered Such a Devastating Blow

By William J. Burns October 14, 2019

Pompeo looks on as Trump holds a news conference after the NATO Summit in Brussels, July 2018 Yves Herman / Reuters

In my three and a half decades as a U.S. Foreign Service officer, proudly serving five presidents and ten secretaries of state from both parties, I’ve never seen an attack on diplomacy as damaging, to both the State Department as an institution and our international influence, as the one now underway.

The contemptible mistreatment of Marie Yovanovitch—the ambassador to Ukraine who was dismissed for getting in the way of the president’s scheme to solicit foreign interference in U.S. elections—is just the latest example of President Donald Trump’s dangerous brand of diplomatic malpractice. His is a diplomacy of narcissism, bent on advancing private interests at the expense of our national interests.

Ambassador Yovanovitch is not the first professional diplomat to find herself in political crosshairs in the history of the State Department. Trump is not the first demagogue to bully career personnel. And Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is not the first secretary of state derelict in his duty. But the damage from this assault—coming from within the executive branch itself, after nearly three years of unceasing diplomatic self-sabotage, and at a particularly fragile geopolitical moment—will likely prove to be even more severe to both diplomatic tradecraft and U.S. foreign policy.

THE NEW MCCARTHYISM

Almost 70 years ago, in the early years of the Cold War, Senator Joseph McCarthy conducted a savage campaign against “disloyalty” in the State Department. Partisan investigators, untethered to evidence or ethics, forced out 81 department employees in the first half of the 1950s. Among them was John Paton Davies, Jr., an accomplished China hand. His sin was to foresee the communist victory in the Chinese Civil War. Davies was subjected to nine security and loyalty investigations, none of which substantiated the paranoid accusation that he was a communist sympathizer. Nevertheless, in a moment of profound political cowardice, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles fired him.

Purging Davies and his colleagues was not only wrong but also foolish. The loss of such expertise

To read the full article

SubscribeRegister

Already have an account? Sign in.

Most Read Articles

The Demolition of U.S. Diplomacy Not Since Joe McCarthy Has the State Department Suffered Such a Devastating Blow William J. Burns Disaster in the Desert Why Trump’s Middle East Plan Can’t Work Martin Indyk Iran, the Unitary State Tehran’s Foreign-Policy Makers Act as One Afshon Ostovar and Ariane M. Tabatabai The Dream Palace of the Americans Why Ceding Land Will Not Bring Peace Michael S. Doran The United States Made Information Free and Foreign Manipulation Possible How Unrestricted Broadcasting Set the Stage for a Misinformation Overload Diana Lemberg More: Trump AdministrationDiplomacy

Stay informed.

In-depth analysis delivered weekly. Sign Up

Related Articles

Iran, the Unitary State Tehran’s Foreign-Policy Makers Act as One Afshon Ostovar and Ariane M. Tabatabai Let Russia Be Russia The Case for a More Pragmatic Approach to Moscow Thomas Graham

This site uses cookies to improve your user experience. Click here to learn more. Continue

Subscribe

Get the Magazine

Save up to 55%

on Foreign Affairs magazine! subscribe

Foreign Affairs

Weekly Newsletter

Get in-depth analysis delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up

About

About UsHistoryStaffCareersEvents

Contact

Customer ServiceContact UsSubmissionsPermissionsAdvertisePress CenterLeave us Feedback

Subscription

SubscriptionsGroup SubscriptionsMy AccountGive a GiftDonateDownload iOS AppNewsletters

Follow

Country Focus

Graduate School Forum

From the
publishers
of Foreign Affairs

The Most:

Trump Kills the G7’s Legitimacy

by Guest Blogger for Stewart M. Patrick

Cyber Week in Review: October 18, 2019

by Adam Segal

Election 2020 Foreign Policy Roundup: The Democratic Debate, Trade Policy, and the Iran Nuclear Deal

by James M. Lindsay

Published by the Council on Foreign Relations Privacy PolicyTerms of Use

©2019 Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Independent Media | Campaigning Journalism

Support the Canary

The sorry facts which show the BBC has moved beyond bias, into pure propaganda

EDITORIAL

The BBC and its political editor Laura Kuenssberg are under fire this week, following local election coverage which has been dismissed as nothing short of propaganda by people across the country. But how did we get here?

Who runs the BBC?

624
Rona Fairhead, Chair of the BBC Trust, and board member of HSBC (image via BBC)

The current abysmal state of BBC News and Politics makes much more sense when you see who has been appointed to plot its editorial course.

The Canary

Get the news that really matters Sign me up

The BBC Trust is responsible for granting licenses to all BBC outlets and stations, managing value for money on licence fee payments and ‘the direction of BBC editorial and creative output’. The Trust consists of 12 Trustees and is headed by Rona Fairhead – who also happens to have been a longtime board member of HSBC bank.

As The Canary’s James Wright reported earlier this year:

Jo Swinson and Boris Johnson

1

Swinson hates Corbyn so much, she’ll back a Tory Brexit to keep him out of government

Fréa Lockley , 16th October 2019

Jeremy Corbyn and Bernie Sanders

0

Corbyn and Sanders praise brave protesters who stopped austerity in its tracks

Ed Sykes , 16th October 2019

Jeremy Corbyn

6

If ever there’s been a time to stand with Jeremy Corbyn, it’s now

Fréa Lockley , 14th October 2019

Fairhead has entrenched ties to the Tory government. In fact, she and Osborne are old friends. Fairhead worked for the Conservative government as a cabinet office member, until being appointed by the previous Conservative culture secretary – Sajid Javid – as the new head of the BBC Trust. She is still business ambassador for David Cameron.

Fairhead has also sat on the board of HSBC directors for a long time. And what is even more shocking than her other Conservative links are claims that she was actually appointed chairwoman of the BBC Trust to keep a lid on Cameron’s involvement in covering up a £1bn fraudulent HSBC scam on British shoppers. Whistle-blower Nicholas Wilson made various freedom of information requests that confirmed that Fairhead’s appointment did not follow proper procedure. She was rushed to the position after the application date closed, with no mention of her on any contemporary media shortlist.

Her appointment does not coincide with the normal process, and many questioned why a business tycoon was right for the job. What it did coincide with was a string of interconnected visits from the BBC, HSBC, the Houses of Parliament and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to Wilson’s website where he details the scam and the FCA and Cameron’s involvement in covering it up.

But the conflicts of interest do not stop at Fairhead.

The Director of News and Current Affairs at the BBC, James Harding, is a former employee of the Murdoch Press. While Editor of The Times newspaper, he was responsible for exposing the identity of police blogger NightJack by hacking the blogger’s email accounts – which his legal team then covered up during a court case against the action. Harding has also gone on the record as ‘pro Israel’.

This is the calibre of the figures responsible for hiring the news teams, presenters and journalists who will report on matters of hacking, privacy, and the Middle East.

These are not trivial conflicts of interests. The two individuals primarily responsible for driving the News and Politics agenda for the BBC, are instead driving forward their personal and professional causes – and the licence fee payer is footing the bill.

What is the impact on reporting?

BBC3

These conflicts of interest affect the reporting of News and Politics at the BBC in a very real way. In 2013, researchers at Cardiff University undertook a major content analysis of BBC coverage – funded in part by the BBC Trust. They studied the impartiality of BBC reporting across several areas, including the Israel-Palestine conflict, the EU, business and economics, and politics.

The findings revealed that:

  • Whichever party is in power, the Conservative party is granted more air time.
  • On BBC News at Six, business representatives outnumbered trade union spokespersons by more than five to one (11 vs 2) in 2007 and by 19 to one in 2012.
  • When it comes to the Financial Crisis, BBC coverage was almost completely dominated by stockbrokers, investment bankers, hedge fund managers and other City voices. Civil society voices or commentators who questioned the benefits of having such a large finance sector were almost completely absent from coverage.

On top of this, BBC reporting of Israel-Palestine has been woefully partisan – and in 2013, we found out one reason why.

In 2013, a devastating report by Electronic Intifada, revealed that Raffi Berg, online editor for BBC News, was instructing journalists to skew reports on Israel-Palestine in favour of Israel. While hundreds of Palestinians were losing their lives during Israel’s eight day assault on the Gaza strip in 2012, Berg was emailing journalists with ‘guidance’ to maintain a pro-Israel tone in their reports. This from the report:

In one, he asked BBC colleagues to word their stories in a way which does not blame or “put undue emphasis” on Israel for starting the prolonged attacks. Instead, he encouraged journalists to promote the Israeli government line that the “offensive” was “aimed at ending rocket fire from Gaza.”

This was despite the fact that Israel broke a ceasefire when it attacked Gaza on 14 November, a ceasefire which the Palestinians had been observing — firing no rockets into Israel.

In a second email, sent during the same period, Berg told BBC journalists:

“Please remember, Israel doesn’t maintain a blockade around Gaza. Egypt controls the southern border.”

He omitted to mention that the United Nations views Israel as the occupying power in Gaza and has called on Israel to end its siege of the Strip. Israel’s refusal to do so is a violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1860.”

Berg is still in his role.

All that’s left is propaganda

Recently, these two vested interests – pro-neoliberalism and pro-Israel – converged on an area of common interest: opposition to Jeremy Corbyn.

This united bitter Blairites, Conservatives and pro-Israel groups – who ran perhaps the most toxic smear campaign against the Labour party and its leader in living memory. In the run up to the local elections on May 5, the headlines across the BBC and wider media’s flagship television and radio programs was not the 1 million people in the UK reliant on food banks to eat, but the intrigue of the smear campaign.

Prior to the elections, the reporting by Kuenssberg was dominated almost exclusively by claims of crisis within Labour, providing a platform to a minority of bitter Blairites, and applying pressure on Corbyn to stand aside – or at the very least prepare to.

On Friday morning – when Corbyn’s vote had not collapsed, but increased, compared to Miliband’s general election performance of 2015 – there was no apology for the wrongful prediction. Instead, the narrative wheeled on regardless. While the SNP lost their majority in Scotland, and Labour advanced in England and Wales – this was the BBC website’s response.

The situation brings to mind the moment when the BBC’s Andrew Marr interviewed Noam Chomsky about the role of the mainstream media as a propaganda service. Chomsky was discussing the role of self-censorship by journalists, and Marr repudiated the claim, asking:

“How can you know if I am self-censoring?” Arguing he had never been censored, or told what to think.

Chomsky calmly responds, as if he were explaining the non-existence of Santa Claus to a child:

“I’m sure you believe everything you’re saying, but what I’m saying is that if you believed something different, you wouldn’t be sitting where you’re sitting.”

And therein lies the rub with the role of the BBC, and the wider mainstream media, as a vehicle by which to advance the causes of those who own and run them. There is a monopoly of wealth and power in our society which translates directly into a monopoly of the media. The result is a staggering lack of diversity and pluralism of voices and opinions in the mainstream space. The media has become little more than a monotonous, relentless monologue – when as a country, and a world, we need to be having a conversation.

Featured Image via Screengrab

Since you’re here …

We know you don’t need a lecture. You wouldn’t be here if you didn’t care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary

Support

Comments are closed

Jo Swinson and Boris Johnson

1

Swinson hates Corbyn so much, she’ll back a Tory Brexit to keep him out of government

Fréa Lockley , 16th October 2019

Jeremy Corbyn and Bernie Sanders

0

Corbyn and Sanders praise brave protesters who stopped austerity in its tracks

Ed Sykes , 16th October 2019

Jeremy Corbyn

6

If ever there’s been a time to stand with Jeremy Corbyn, it’s now

Fréa Lockley , 14th October 2019

Laura Kuenssberg and the BBC get slammed for ‘woeful’ election coverage (TWEETS, VIDEO)George Osborne is being obliterated on Twitter for his classless comments on local elections (TWEETS)

Kerry-anne Mendoza

Kerry-anne Mendoza
6th May 2016 2 comments TAGS:

Help us survive and thrive

Support usand go ad-free

Trending now

Most Popular

Labour has the perfect response to Jo Swinson’s terrible take on Jeremy Corbyn

If a devastating viral Fox News story is anything to go by, Donald Trump’s political career is over

The home secretary’s mask slip was so obvious that even Andrew Marr couldn’t let it slide

Most Commented

If ever there’s been a time to stand with Jeremy Corbyn, it’s now

Extinction Rebellion ‘own goal’ shows why climate action needs working-class people at the forefront

Labour has the perfect response to Jo Swinson’s terrible take on Jeremy Corbyn

The Canary Media Ltd, PO Box 3301, Bristol, BS5 5GD. Registered in England. Company registration number 09788095. Contact: hello@thecanary.co.
© Canary Media Limited 2015-19. All rights reserved.

Help us survive and thrive

Support us and go ad-free

This site

© The Canary 2019 | Website by Doc&Tee | Hosted by Krystal Necessary Always Enabled

Tommy Robinson Posted September 22nd 2019

Tommy Robinson will lead a march to Twitter’s UK head office to protest against his account being suspended for violating the social media giants rules against “hateful conduct”, he confirmed in an explosive video last night.

The citizen journalist and anti-Islam activist will march for just over a mile from Speakers’ Corner in Hyde Park through Mayfair to Twitter’s main UK base in Soho on Sunday 6th May. And he asked his loyal supporters to join him on the rally after stating “what we are seeing is blasphemy laws by the backdoor” adding “there is no seven-day ban or state censorship that can change 1,400 years of documented history”.

TOMMY ROBINSON TO LEAD MARCH TO TWITTER'S HEAD OFFICE

Robinson was quick to point out that the ‘offending’ tweet made reference to the ideology of Islam rather than individual Muslims who can interpret that ideology differently.

“I didn’t tweet that Muslims promote killing people,” he said. “I said Islam does, because it does.

“They are all complicit. Twitter, our police, our courts, our Prime Minister, our entire government and media – all of them raise one hand in support of freedom of speech while they rip it out from under us with the other. You are being lied to – we all are. There is a concerted effort to suppress free speech in the UK.

“And Twitter, Facebook, our police, our government, our media – they’re all in on it. This is an eco-system – my tweet was not hateful conduct, but Twitter uses that excuse knowing full well that the media will run with it. Spreading the lie and empowering our corrupt and pandering political establishment to demonise and criminalise criticism of Islam.”

Robinson also highlighted the hypocrisy of Hamas, Hezbollah and the Muslim Brotherhood – all of them proscribed terrorist organisations – still having a voice of the social media platform while his account with more than 400,000 followers was targeted.

He finished the three-minute video with a rallying cry, urging supporters: “For anyone who cares for freedom of speech, will you join me on the 6th May?”

Earlier Robinson had sent AltNewsMedia exclusive screenshots (above) showing Twitter warning him not to attempt to evade a permanent suspension by creating new accounts.

To view the full video, which received 20,000 views within the first hour, please visit this page.

Shy Society.
www.shysociety.co.uk
Standing up for those without a voice in Britain

AltNewsMedia
AltNewsMedia

Latest News

EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW WITH BREXIT PARTY FOUNDER CATHERINE BLAIKLOCK

EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW WITH BREXIT PARTY FOUNDER CATHERINE BLAIKLOCK

AltNewsMedia provides an alternative to the fake news mainstream media narrative.Topical NewsOpinionBrexitDavid VanceInterviewsNewsPodcast

EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW WITH BREXIT PARTY FOUNDER CATHERINE BLAIKLOCK

Tweet

Released 21st September 2019

EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW WITH BREXIT PARTY FOUNDER CATHERINE BLAIKLOCK

David Vance caught up with Catherine Blaiklock – original founder of the Brexit Party in an exclusive interview.

She revealed some explosive information that will alarm many Brexit Party members and supporters. Has Nigel Farage passed his sell by date?

Not only does the Brexit Party refuse to discuss mass immigration, but many of its MEPs support it.

Listen for yourself.

AltNewsMedia provides a platform and a voice for those not afforded one by the legacy fake news media. We are self funded – please consider supporting us as we don’t have donors or sponsors to ensure we can stay truly independent. Tags::

David Vance

David Vance used to be disgusted but now he tries to be amused! Editor of BiasedBBC.org and ATangledWeb.org, he has appeared on all forms of legacy media but has had enough of that! In the battle for truth and liberty, he prefers the front line. Join our fight back here on AltNewsMedia and subscribe to the platform.

Previous Article BLACKFACE | IN DEFENCE OF St. JUSTIN

You Might also Like

THE BEACON IN BRECON!David Vance August 2, 2019 BORIS OR NIGEL?David Vance July 1, 2019 MILKSHAKEISM!Guest Author June 15, 2019 ACID ATTACKS AND THE HAPPY CITYChauncey Tinker May 30, 2019

Sign up to our Newsletter

Get the News that really matters

Email address:

Click here to unsubscribe

Popular Posts You May Like

“I WILL RIP YOUR HEAD OFF” – EXPOSING THE VIOLENT HATRED OF ABDUL HAMIDImam Tawhidi May 19, 2018

Join us Join us Join us


EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW WITH BREXIT PARTY FOUNDER CATHERINE BLAIKLOCK
Home

ALTNEWSMEDIA provides an alternative to the fake news mainstream media narrative.

POPULAR POSTS

“I WILL RIP YOUR HEAD OFF” – EXPOSING THE VIOLENT HATRED OF ABDUL HAMIDImam Tawhidi May 19, 2018

Recent Posts
EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW WITH BREXIT PARTY FOUNDER CATHERINE BLAIKLOCK

© 2019 AltNewsMedia. All Rights Reserved. AltNewsMedia uses cookies to improve your experience. We’ll assume you’re ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. AcceptRejectRead our updated Privacy Policy Necessary Always Enabled